Nautilus Temporal range:
| |
---|---|
![]() | |
A live Nautilus pompilius in an aquarium | |
Scientific classification ![]() | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Mollusca |
Class: | Cephalopoda |
Subclass: | Nautiloidea |
Order: | Nautilida |
Family: | Nautilidae |
Genus: | Nautilus Linnaeus, 1758 |
Type species | |
N. pompilius | |
Living species | |
Nautilus is a marine cephalopod genus in the mollusk family Nautilidae. Species in this genus differ significantly, morphologically, from the two nautilus species in the adjacent sister-taxon Allonautilus.[2] The oldest fossils of the genus are known from the Late Eocene Hoko River Formation, in Washington State and from Late-Eocene to Early Oligocene sediments in Kazakhstan.[1] The oldest fossils of the modern species Nautilus pompilius are from Early Pleistocene sediments off the coast of Luzon in the Philippines.[1]
The commonly used term 'nautilus' usually refers to any of the surviving members of Nautilidae, and more specifically to the Nautilus pompilius species. The entire family of Nautilidae, including all species in the genera Nautilus and Allonautilus, is listed on Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).[3]
Various authors claim that the genus consists of between four and seven extant species; this remains the subject of debate.[4][5] Nautiloids are typically found in shallow ocean waters in tropical seas, mainly within the Indo-Pacific, from the Coral Triangle and Strait of Malacca to the open water South Pacific islands.[4] The genus Nautilus includes several species represented in the fossil record; however, these have also been contentious in their placement, and some are only provisionally accepted.[6]
Classification
The classification of species within Nautilus has been contentious for decades, and the genus has been reconfigured and redefined several times throughout its history. Nautilus is the type genus of the family Nautilidae, originally defined as any coiled-shell species with simple sutures, or walls, between shell compartments.[7] Any shells with complex sutures were assigned to the genus Ammonites. This definition persisted for nearly 200 years, from the time of the genera's 1758 inception by Carl Linnaeus to 1949, when paleobiologist Arthur K. Miller provided a detailed description of the shell of N. pompilius, becoming the type species of the genus.[7][8] In 1951, he determined that only extant species of Nautilus should be placed in the genus, despite many fossil species having already been assigned to it.[7]
In the years following this conclusion, fossil species were still sometimes assigned to the genus; however, many other authors insisted that these be excluded.[4] In 2021, a review of the evidence concluded that the recognition of exclusively-fossil genera was largely arbitrary, instead recognising numerous extinct species within the genus Nautilus.[6]
Species
- †Nautilus altifrons (Chapman, 1915) - Australia
- †Nautilus balcombensis (Chapman, 1915) - Australia
- Nautilus belauensis Saunders, 1981 – Palau
- †Nautilus butonensis Martin, 1933 - Indonesia
- †Nautilus campbelli Meek, 1862 (provisional placement) - Western North America
- †Nautilus cookanus Whitfield, 1892 - North America
- †Nautilus geelongensis (Foord, 1891) - Australia
- †Nautilus javanus Martin, 1879 - Indonesia
- Nautilus macromphalus G.B. Sowerby II, 1849 – New Caledonia
- Nautilus pompilius Linnaeus, 1758 – Indonesia (type; also biggest and most widespread species)
- N. p. pompilius
- N. p. suluensis
- †Nautilus praepompilius Shimansky, 1957
- Nautilus samoaensis Barord et al., 2023[9] – Samoa
- Nautilus stenomphalus G.B. Sowerby II, 1849 – Great Barrier Reef
- †Nautilus taiwanus Huang, 2002 (provisional placement) – Taiwan
- Nautilus vanuatuensis Barord et al., 2023[9] – Vanuatu
- Nautilus vitiensis Barord et al., 2023[9] – Fiji
Other described species:
Described species | Status |
N. ambiguus | Nomen Dubium |
N. alumnus | Nomen Dubium |
N. scrobiculatus | Reclassified as Allonautilus |
N. umbiliculatus | Synonym of N. scrobiculatus |
N. perforatus | Synonym of N. scrobiculatus |
N. texturatus | Synonym of N. scrobiculatus |
N. repertus | Nomen Dubium: likely a giant form of N. pompilius[4][10] |
Controversy over species
There has been much debate over the validity of species within the genus, and several identified species have since been reclassified or determined as taxonomic synonyms or nomen dubium (a doubtful classification). As of 2015, only four Nautilus species have been recognised, specifically N. pompilius, N. macromphalus, N. stenomphalus, and N. belauensis,[5] and three more were described in 2023. Nautilus scrobiculatus, now Allonautilus scrobiculatus, has been assigned to a new genus,[2] and several species listed above have been identified as synonyms of this species, namely N. umbiculatus, N. perforatus, and N. texturatus.[4] Much of the confusion regarding the classification of species is due to the rarity of live species. The majority of described species have been determined on the drift shells of individuals alone, leading to inaccuracies when defining species divisions.[11] For example, although N. pompilius was well studied in the 19th century,[12] it was not until 1996 that soft tissues of Allonautilus scrobiculatus had been dissected.[5]
Genetic studies
Several genetic studies have also been conducted on select species of Nautilus, from 1995 onwards, most of which focus on a single gene, called COI. These studies ultimately lead to the decision to remove N. scrobiculatus from the genus.[5] Furthermore, some biologists claim that N. stenomphalus and N. belauensis are members of N. pompilius based on both genetic and morphological data.[5] One study, sampling Nautiluses in 2012, demonstrated that the features of Nautilus pompilius and Nautilus stenomphalus exist along a spectrum, with a range of individuals displaying a combination of characteristics, further invalidating them as separate species.[5]
Additionally, mitochondrial DNA studies, utilising two gene regions, also have led to the notion that many of the morphological differences between differeont Nautilus populations are simply localised variations within the single Nautilus species.[13] This same 2011 study, however, suggested that N. macromphalus was a species synonymous with A. scrobiculatus, leading to further debate over classification. These findings were also reinforced by the initial DNA studies conducted on the genus, which only revealed two phylogenetic species.[14]
A 2017 study determined that there were likely five Nautilus species, however these did not exactly correlate to the described species of the genus.[10] Whilst the status of N. macromphalus, N. stenomphalus, and N. pompilius were validated by the genetic study, two undescribed, but genetically distinct, species were discovered in the South Pacific.[10] One of these cryptic species was recorded from Vanuatu, whilst the other from Fiji and American Samoa. Whilst this study recorded five species, its results suggested that N. belauensis and N. repertus were synonyms with N. pompilius.[10] This study resulted in the description of three new species in 2023, recognizing the species from Fiji and American Samoa as two taxa rather than one.[9]
Evolution
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/33/The_first_and_oldest_fossil_of_Chambered_Nautilus_displayed_at_Philippine_National_Museum.jpg/387px-The_first_and_oldest_fossil_of_Chambered_Nautilus_displayed_at_Philippine_National_Museum.jpg)
In addition to defining species, genetic studies have also provided evidence for the evolution of the genus over time. Mitochondrial DNA studies have indicated that the genus is currently undergoing evolutionary radiation in the Indo-Pacific.[13] The divergence between the genus Nautilus, and its sister taxon Allonautilus likely occurred around New Guinea, and the Great Barrier Reef,[13] during the Mesozoic.[2] From there, populations of Nautilus split diverged further, involving migrations east to Vanuatu, Fiji, and American Samoa, as well as west, to the Philippines, Palau, Indonesia, and western Australia.[13]
Sensory organs
Nautilus have unique sensory organs, which differ from related genera in several ways. Unlike other cephalopods, the eyes of Nautilus species lack ocular muscles and instead move via a stalk, which contains both muscle and connective tissue. Additionally, Nautilus eyes lack any lens or cornea and only have an aperture to allow for light.
Below their eyes, Nautilus also feature rhinophores, which are small sacs with cilia.[15] It has been suggested that this organ contains chemoreceptors, in order to detect food or sample the surrounding water.[15] Additionally, the tentacles of the Nautilus also perform several sensory functions. Their ocular and preocular tentacles feature cilia, and operate as mechanoreceptors, while their digital tentacles have been hypothesised to feature a range of receptor cells.[15]
Habitat and distribution
Species within the genus Nautilus are localised to the Indo-Pacific, specifically the tropical seas within this area,[7] however the full extent of their geographic distribution has yet to be recorded.[4] The movements of Nautilus species are greatly restricted by water depth. Nautilus are unable to easily move across areas deeper than 800 metres, and most of their activity occurs at a depth of 100–300 metres deep.[4] Nautilus can occasionally be found closer to the surface than 100 metres, however, the minimum depth they can reach is determined by factors such as water temperature and season.[4] All Nautilus species are likely endangered, based on information from Nautilus Pompilius overfishing in the Philippines, which resulted in an 80% decline in the population from 1980 to 2010.[16]
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/Nautilus_pompilius_%28chambered_nautilus%29_%28offshore_from_Broome%2C_Western_Australia%29_%2824052390712%29.jpg/239px-Nautilus_pompilius_%28chambered_nautilus%29_%28offshore_from_Broome%2C_Western_Australia%29_%2824052390712%29.jpg)
Many shells recovered from areas of the world have not yet been identified down to the level of species, however, are still identifiable as members of the genus Nautilus. Shells have been found across a wide range of coastal areas, including Korea, Australia, Seychelles, Mauritius, the Philippines, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, India, Sri Lanka, Kenya, and South Africa.[4] This does not necessarily imply live populations of Nautilus at these sites, however, as Nautilus drift shells are able to make their way across oceans via currents. Following the death of an individual, Nautilus shells can float to the surface, where they can remain for a considerable time period,[4] however the buoyancy of shells after death was found to be dependent on several factors, such as the rate of decay.[17] An experiment with a Nautilus shell in an aquarium resulted in the shell floating for over two years, and one recovered shell was revealed to have been afloat for a period of 11 years.[4] Furthermore, shells have been demonstrated to drift considerable distances in this time, contributing to their extensive distribution across coastal areas. Several ocean currents have been identified to contribute to this process. The Kuroshio Current carries shells from the Philippines to areas such as Japan, and the Equatorial current is responsible for many of the shells recovered from the Marshall Islands.[4]
Behaviour
Nautilus have been observed to spend days in deeper areas around coral reefs, to avoid predation from turtles and carnivorous fish, and ascend to shallow areas of the reef during nights.[18][11] Here, they engage in scavenging activity, seeking out animal remains, and the moults of crustaceans. Nautilus species usually travel and feed alone. Nautilus return to deeper areas following daybreak and also lay eggs in these locations, which take approximately one year to hatch.[11] This behaviour may have ensured their survival during the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction, when shallow areas of ocean became inhospitable.[11] Nautilus have been noted to exhibit an extensive range of depth, close to 500 metres, however, they were demonstrated to be at risk of implosion when exceeding their depth and pressure limits. Depending on the species, the shells of live Nautilus will collapse at depths of 750 metres or deeper.[18][4]
The feeding behaviour of the genus has been identified from observation of captive individuals, as well as the stomach contents of wild specimens. Nautilus are opportunistic scavengers and feed on a variety of crustaceans, including their moults, and fish, however, they have been observed to feed on chicken and bat bait.[4] Initially, Nautilus were thought to actively hunt certain prey, however, this activity has only been recorded in traps, where prey species are confined in close proximity to Nautilus. Nautilus locate these food sources by using their tentacles, which have chemosensory functions, as well as by sight. Nautilus participate in routine vertical migration,[18] in which they ascend to shallow areas of reefs, between 100 and 150 metres deep, during the night to feed, and later descend to depths of 250–350 metres during the day, however, these depths may vary depending on local geographic characteristics.[4] Nautilus are able to ascend at speeds of approximately 2 metres per minute and descend at speeds of 3 metres per minute.[4]
Predation
Several species have been observed to prey on Nautilus. Octopuses were listed as predators of the genus, following an incident where an octopus was shown to have partially consumed a Nautilus in a trap. Additionally, many drift shells exhibit small holes which match the patterns produced by octopus boring into shell to feed.[4] Teleosts, such as triggerfish, have also been observed to feed on Nautilus, by violently charging at individuals to break their shells. In response to attacks from predators, Nautilus withdraw into their shells.[4]
Nautilus in aquaria
It is possible to keep Nautilus in aquaria, however, specific care is necessary in order to ensure their survival in captivity. The survival rate of Nautilus in captivity is relatively poor, primarily due to the stress that individuals are subjected to during transportation. As many as 50-80% of Nautilus die during transportation, and this percentage can be higher if individuals are exposed to high temperatures.[4] In captivity, Nautilus are generally fed a diet of whole shrimp, fish, crab, and lobster moults.[4][19] Several aquaria around the world host specimens of the genus, however, there have not yet been any successful attempts of breeding in captivity, despite viable eggs being produced at several locations.[4] Two Nautilus eggs were hatched at Waikiki Aquarium, however, these individuals both died months later.[19]
In addition to observing wild specimens, our knowledge of Nautilus temperature thresholds is also supplemented by the study of captive individuals in aquaria. Captive Nautilus specimens have demonstrated that prolonged exposure to temperatures over 25 degrees Celsius will eventually result in death after several days. However, individuals have been documented to experience temperatures higher than this, and survive, as long as they are not exposed to these temperatures for longer than 10 hours. Optimal temperatures for the genus tend to range from 9-21 degrees Celsius.[4]
Reproduction
The majority of our knowledge regarding Nautilus reproduction comes from captive species in aquaria. From these specimens, it appears that Nautilus do not have an elaborate courtship process. Males have been observed to attempt to mate with any object the same size and shape as another Nautilus. If a male is successful in finding a female, however, the mating process follows, and afterwards, the male may continue to hold onto the female for a period ranging from minutes to hours.[4]
Nautilus eggs are laid in capsules, usually 3–4 cm long,[19] which gradually harden when exposed to seawater.[4] It is not yet known how exactly the juveniles break out of these capsules, yet it has been hypothesized that they are able to chew their way out, using their beak. The genus exhibits a skewed sex ratio, biased towards male individuals. This phenomenon has been observed at several locations around the globe, with population samples consisting of up to 95% males. The reason for this is currently unknown.[4]
Nautilus male has a reproductive organ named Van der Hoeven's organ. Nautilus female has two reproductive organs whose functions are unknown, the Organ of Valenciennes and Owen's laminated organ.[20]
References
- ^ a b c Wani, R.; et al. (2008). "First discovery of fossil Nautilus pompilius (Nautilidae, Cephalopoda) from Pangasinan, northwestern Philippines". Paleontological Research. 12 (1): 89–95. doi:10.2517/1342-8144(2008)12[89:FDOFNP]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 129517075.
- ^ a b c Ward, P. D.; Saunders, W. B. (1997). "Allonautilus: a new genus of living nautiloid cephalopod and its bearing on phylogeny of the Nautilida". Journal of Paleontology. 71 (6): 1054–64. Bibcode:1997JPal...71.1054W. doi:10.1017/S0022336000036039. JSTOR 1306604. S2CID 87319305.
- ^ "Checklist of CITES species".
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Saunders, W. Bruce. Landman, Neil H. (2010). Nautilus : the biology and paleobiology of a living fossil. Springer. ISBN 978-90-481-3298-0. OCLC 613896438.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d e f Ward, Peter; Dooley, Frederick; Barord, Gregory Jeff (2016-02-29). "Nautilus: biology, systematics, and paleobiology as viewed from 2015". Swiss Journal of Palaeontology. 135 (1): 169–185. doi:10.1007/s13358-016-0112-7. ISSN 1664-2376. S2CID 87025055.
- ^ a b Goedert, James L.; Kiel, Steffen; Tsai, Cheng-Hsiu (2022). "Miocene Nautilus (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) from Taiwan, and a review of the Indo-Pacific fossil record of Nautilus". Island Arc. 31. doi:10.1111/iar.12442. S2CID 247532223.
- ^ a b c d Teichert, Curt; Matsumoto, Tatsuro (1987), The Ancestry of the Genus Nautilus, Topics in Geobiology, vol. 6, Springer US, pp. 25–32, doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-5040-6_2 (inactive 2024-04-15), ISBN 978-1-4899-5042-0
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of April 2024 (link) - ^ Miller, A. K. (September 1949). "The Last Surge of the Nautiloid Cephalopods". Evolution. 3 (3): 231–238. doi:10.2307/2405560. ISSN 0014-3820. JSTOR 2405560. PMID 18138384.
- ^ a b c d Gregory J. Barord, David J. Combosch, Gonzalo Giribet, Neil Landman, Sarah Lemer, Job Veloso et Peter D. Ward, « Three new species of Nautilus Linnaeus, 1758 (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) from the Coral Sea and South Pacific », ZooKeys, vol. 1143, 2023, p. 51-69.
- ^ a b c d Combosch, David J.; Lemer, Sarah; Ward, Peter D.; Landman, Neil H.; Giribet, Gonzalo (2017-10-07). "Genomic signatures of evolution in Nautilus —An endangered living fossil". Molecular Ecology. 26 (21): 5923–5938. doi:10.1111/mec.14344. ISSN 0962-1083. PMID 28872211. S2CID 2153267.
- ^ a b c d "Coils of Time". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 2020-05-12.
- ^ Griffin, Lawrence E. (October 1897). "Notes on the Anatomy of Nautilus Pompilius". Zoological Bulletin. 1 (3): 147–161. doi:10.2307/1535418. ISSN 0898-1051. JSTOR 1535418.
- ^ a b c d Bonacum, James; Landman, Neil H.; Mapes, Royal H.; White, Matthew M.; White, Alicia-Jeannette; Irlam, Justin (March 2011). "Evolutionary Radiation of Present-DayNautilusandAllonautilus". American Malacological Bulletin. 29 (1–2): 77–93. doi:10.4003/006.029.0221. ISSN 0740-2783. S2CID 86014620.
- ^ Wray, Charles G.; Landman, Neil H.; Saunders, W. Bruce; Bonacum, James (1995). "Genetic divergence and geographic diversification in Nautilus". Paleobiology. 21 (2): 220–228. Bibcode:1995Pbio...21..220W. doi:10.1017/s009483730001321x. ISSN 0094-8373. S2CID 85659002.
- ^ a b c Barber, V. C.; Wright, D. E. (1969). "The fine structure of the sense organs of the cephalopod mollusc Nautilus". Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie. 102 (3): 293–312. doi:10.1007/bf00335442. ISSN 0302-766X. PMID 4903946. S2CID 19565604.
- ^ Dunstan, A.; Alanis, O.; Marshall, J. (November 2010). "Nautilus pompilius fishing and population decline in the Philippines: A comparison with an unexploited Australian Nautilus population". Fisheries Research. 106 (2): 239–247. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2010.06.015. ISSN 0165-7836.
- ^ Chamberlain, John A.; Ward, Peter D.; Weaver, J. Scott (1981). "Post-mortem ascent of Nautilus shells: implications for cephalopod paleobiogeography". Paleobiology. 7 (4): 494–509. Bibcode:1981Pbio....7..494C. doi:10.1017/s0094837300025549. ISSN 0094-8373. S2CID 89107860.
- ^ a b c Dunstan, Andrew J.; Ward, Peter D.; Marshall, N. Justin (2011-02-22). "Vertical Distribution and Migration Patterns of Nautilus pompilius". PLOS ONE. 6 (2): e16311. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...616311D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016311. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3043052. PMID 21364981.
- ^ a b c Landman, Neil H.; Cochran, J. Kirk; Rye, Danny M.; Tanabe, Kazushige; Arnold, John M. (1994). "Early life history of Nautilus: evidence from isotopic analyses of aquarium-reared specimens". Paleobiology. 20 (1): 40–51. Bibcode:1994Pbio...20...40L. doi:10.1017/s009483730001112x. ISSN 0094-8373. S2CID 89164986.
- ^ Arthur Willey (1902). Zoological Results Based on Material from New Britain, New Guinea, Loyalty Islands and Elsewhere: The anatomy and development of Peripatus novae-britanniae. University Press. pp. 778–9.