![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Francisco Rafael Arellano Félix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 00:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: ComputerJA (☎ • ✎)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'll stay tuned. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 01:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
![]()
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
excellent (Thorough check on Google.)
![]() Check for WP:RS: Cross-checked with other GAs: Jesús Blancornelas, Nazario Moreno González, María Santos Gorrostieta Salazar, Antonio Cárdenas Guillén, Regina Martínez Pérez, Mario Ramírez Treviño, Valor por Tamaulipas, Miguel Treviño Morales, Manuel Buendía
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]() Cross-checked with other GAs: Jesús Blancornelas, Nazario Moreno González, María Santos Gorrostieta Salazar, Antonio Cárdenas Guillén, Regina Martínez Pérez, Mario Ramírez Treviño, Valor por Tamaulipas, Miguel Treviño Morales, Manuel Buendía
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with a valid FUR)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. Thanks, ComputerJA, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Francisco Rafael Arellano Félix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.debate.com.mx/eldebate/noticias/default.asp?IdArt=13691436&IdCat=17402&sl=2
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.nexos.com.mx/?P=leerarticulo&Article=2099639
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/06/world/americas/06briefs-drug.html?_r=0
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6KV3LYlLi?url=http://www.milenio.com/cdb/doc/noticias2011/96c635b53e31f2ee3b9cb60d74e4a4e3 to http://www.milenio.com/cdb/doc/noticias2011/96c635b53e31f2ee3b9cb60d74e4a4e3
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.debate.com.mx/eldebate/noticias/default.asp?IdArt=13693679&IdCat=6098&sl=2
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.noroeste.com.mx/movil/publicacion.php?id=908050&dr=13%3B131107%3B
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.debate.com.mx/eldebate/noticias/default.asp?idArt=13688555&IdCat=17346&page=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)