This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Questionable notability
Subject does not seem to be notable and most of the 'awards' does not seem to be verifiable. For example, the stament "The podcast had a quarter of a million downloads within its first five months.[4]" leads a 404 page. The rest are self-initiated whether it interviews or because of self-publications. — Infogapp1 (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Here’s the link you questioned, works fine for me https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news/broadcasting-news/2020/03/football-finance-experts-podcast-gets-250k-listeners-five-months Hildreth gazzard (talk) 15:23, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because meets notability guidelines with respect to the media Wikipedia:Notability (media) and Wikipedia:Notability (periodicals). Subject is considered by reliable sources to be authoritative in their subject area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hildreth gazzard (talk • contribs) 11:20, 14 June 2020 (UTC)