Napoli, 2011–12 Champions League
Napoli indeed is secured of participation in the tournament. The reason for that is the match between Udinese and Lazio next week.
In case of an Lazio win or a tie, the worst case for Napoli would be tie for either third (in case of a Lazio win) or fourth (in case of a draw) with Roma; they would win this on their superior head-to-head record as they have won both their matches against Roma.
If Udinese wins said match, the worst scenario would be a three-way tie for third between Napoli, Roma and Udinese; all three teams have six points each from their head-to-head matches (Napoli beat Roma twice, Roma beat Udinese twice, Udinese beat Napoli twice), but Napoli have the best goal difference among these three (+1, Udinese even, Roma –1).
So, it literally takes a degree in maths to figure that out. Should not be much of a problem for an user named "DerivatoParziale", though.^^ Have a nice day, Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 21:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- perfect ;-D --DerivatoParziale (talk) 21:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
You're absolutely right. My fault. :) Hilfemann (talk)
Discussion at Talk:List of German football transfers summer 2011
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of German football transfers summer 2011. Kq-hit (talk) 11:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
2012 Africa Cup of Nations
This is straight from the result section which ha s the crosslink(Lihaas (talk) 21:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)).
In case you didn't know already, some match reports by CAF do not indicate the accurate time the goals were scored. Take the 6-1 win by Guinea for example. Diallo's first goal came in 14:25, aka 15th minute but CAF lists it as 14th minute. Dipsy's goal came at 22:33, aka 23rd minute but CAF lists it as 22nd minute, Traore's goal came in 48:23 or 45+4, a far cry from CAF's 45+1, Guinea's final scorer was #14, that's Naby Soumah, Ismael Bangura got the assist...... and so on for other goals in this match and even in other matches. Banana Fingers (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
But what is the official source, that we take for the data? Hilfemann (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC+1)
- The best and as most accurate I would say, which was also suggested by User:Theurgist, is Soccerway.com Banana Fingers (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Eintracht Frankfurt II
When moving an article to a new name like you did with Eintracht Frankfurt II could you please fix the links in the associated templates too as otherwise somebody else has to do it for you. Thanks, Calistemon (talk) 19:49, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Oberliga Westfalen
I noticed you keep a larger number of local football tables on your userpage which you regularly update. If I created an 2015–16 Oberliga Westfalen article, similar to 2015–16 Oberliga Baden-Württemberg, would you update the table at regular intervals? Unfortunatly the other leagues you keep there probably fail the notability guide lines. Regards, Calistemon (talk) 09:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- I designed those football tables as my personal playground, but sure, I would update the Oberliga Westfalen at least once a week. Hilfemann (talk) 09:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- No worries, I have created 2015–16 Oberliga Westfalen. Feel free to improve or update. Calistemon (talk) 23:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Timestamp
Hi.
When you update statistics please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.
Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 21:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Hilfemann. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Hilfemann. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Hilfemann. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Hilfemann. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
IHF
Hey, only after the preliminary round head to head is included as written in the article. Kante4 (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)