→Redirecting the article?: Reply Tag: Reply |
Volunteer Marek (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Also, Gitz, you really need to stop [[WP:STALK]]ing my edits. Not gonna ask again.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 18:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
:Also, Gitz, you really need to stop [[WP:STALK]]ing my edits. Not gonna ask again.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 18:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
::I've already tald you that I'm not stalking you, so please take your complaint about stalking where it belongs rather than casting aspersion on this talk page. With regard to sources, this source seems good: {{Cite book |title=Insurgent Women: Female Combatants in Civil Wars |last=Trisko Darden |first=Jessica |isbn=1626166668 |url=https://books.google.it/books?hl=it&lr=&id=tzmDDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Vita+Zaverukha&ots=8Bxwa4VZML&sig=adRh-BU124Hd3niB9fiphhtNzzc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Vita%20Zaverukha&f=false |last2=Alexis |first2=Henshaw |last3=Ora |first3=Szekely}} It says that {{tq|Other women appear to glorify their newfound ability to engage in violence. Vita Zaverukha stands out in this respect}}, and then it goes on reporting information about her. [[User:Gitz6666|Gitz]] ([[User talk:Gitz6666|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Gitz6666|contribs]]) 19:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
::I've already tald you that I'm not stalking you, so please take your complaint about stalking where it belongs rather than casting aspersion on this talk page. With regard to sources, this source seems good: {{Cite book |title=Insurgent Women: Female Combatants in Civil Wars |last=Trisko Darden |first=Jessica |isbn=1626166668 |url=https://books.google.it/books?hl=it&lr=&id=tzmDDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Vita+Zaverukha&ots=8Bxwa4VZML&sig=adRh-BU124Hd3niB9fiphhtNzzc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Vita%20Zaverukha&f=false |last2=Alexis |first2=Henshaw |last3=Ora |first3=Szekely}} It says that {{tq|Other women appear to glorify their newfound ability to engage in violence. Vita Zaverukha stands out in this respect}}, and then it goes on reporting information about her. [[User:Gitz6666|Gitz]] ([[User talk:Gitz6666|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Gitz6666|contribs]]) 19:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::This is not enough to establish notability especially since if you look at the sources it’s just repeating stuff from Daily Mail etc. |
|||
:::And you *admitted* you were checking my contributions - which combined with you following me to multiple articles and always disagreeing or reverting is pretty much an admission of WP:STALKing and WP:HARASSMENT.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 19:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:24, 10 December 2022
![]() | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Redirecting the article?
I don't see the point of redirecting this article to Aidar Battalion, where Zaverukha is not even mentioned [1]. Besides, if one doubts the notability of the subject, AfD should be the venue for addressing that concern. Contentious and unsourced content can be immediately removed, but wiping out the whole article by redirecting it to nowhere is not OK. I ping editors from the article revision history: @Volunteer Marek, Yarkovesh, David Gerard, Onel5969, Origami2021, Amigao, and Mhorg: Gitz (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- This is one massive BLP vio on a non notable person. The presence of garbage sources like Daily Mail makes it pretty clear this is a hatchet job. The few reliable sources either do not mention her or mention her very briefly. BLP is non negotiable - see the notice on top of this talk.
- Also, Gitz, you really need to stop WP:STALKing my edits. Not gonna ask again. Volunteer Marek 18:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I've already tald you that I'm not stalking you, so please take your complaint about stalking where it belongs rather than casting aspersion on this talk page. With regard to sources, this source seems good: Trisko Darden, Jessica; Alexis, Henshaw; Ora, Szekely. Insurgent Women: Female Combatants in Civil Wars. ISBN 1626166668. It says that
Other women appear to glorify their newfound ability to engage in violence. Vita Zaverukha stands out in this respect
, and then it goes on reporting information about her. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 19:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)- This is not enough to establish notability especially since if you look at the sources it’s just repeating stuff from Daily Mail etc.
- And you *admitted* you were checking my contributions - which combined with you following me to multiple articles and always disagreeing or reverting is pretty much an admission of WP:STALKing and WP:HARASSMENT. Volunteer Marek 19:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I've already tald you that I'm not stalking you, so please take your complaint about stalking where it belongs rather than casting aspersion on this talk page. With regard to sources, this source seems good: Trisko Darden, Jessica; Alexis, Henshaw; Ora, Szekely. Insurgent Women: Female Combatants in Civil Wars. ISBN 1626166668. It says that