Happyblackcat (talk | contribs) |
Sergecross73 (talk | contribs) Tag: Reply |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
I believe [[User:(Oinkers42)/sandbox/Amy Rose|this article about Amy Rose]] is ready for publication. Amy Rose is [[Notability|notable]]. She has been around since 1993, i.e., for 30 years at the time of writing this. That is enough time for people to be aware of her existence. Amy has been a [[playable character]] in multiple games, a major [[non-playable character]] in others, and has been featured in a plethora of other media. What will it take for her to have her own article? I believe enough years have passed, a bunch of reliable sources have been cited, and sufficient edits have been made for this article to be polished to a level where it is ready to be published and viewed by the general public. Will it take her appearance in a future feature-length film for this article to be published? If anyone disagrees, please feel free to provide your explanation as to why Amy can't have her own article. I would love to hear it, but with all due respect, I truly hope a consensus is reached where everyone agrees that she should have her own separate article before another decade goes by. [[User:Happyblackcat|Happyblackcat]] ([[User talk:Happyblackcat|talk]]) 20:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC) |
I believe [[User:(Oinkers42)/sandbox/Amy Rose|this article about Amy Rose]] is ready for publication. Amy Rose is [[Notability|notable]]. She has been around since 1993, i.e., for 30 years at the time of writing this. That is enough time for people to be aware of her existence. Amy has been a [[playable character]] in multiple games, a major [[non-playable character]] in others, and has been featured in a plethora of other media. What will it take for her to have her own article? I believe enough years have passed, a bunch of reliable sources have been cited, and sufficient edits have been made for this article to be polished to a level where it is ready to be published and viewed by the general public. Will it take her appearance in a future feature-length film for this article to be published? If anyone disagrees, please feel free to provide your explanation as to why Amy can't have her own article. I would love to hear it, but with all due respect, I truly hope a consensus is reached where everyone agrees that she should have her own separate article before another decade goes by. [[User:Happyblackcat|Happyblackcat]] ([[User talk:Happyblackcat|talk]]) 20:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
:On Wikipedia, whether or not a subject has its own article isn't dependent on how many games or films they appear in. It's whether or not it meets the [[WP:GNG]]. I'd recommend looking into the reasons her article was eliminated before, and providing evidence on how things have changed, instead, as that would be far more persuasive. I can dig up past discussions for you if you're serious about pursuing this. [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal">msg me</span>]] 00:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:22, 16 November 2023
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Missing Carecter
"Sticks the badger" is a badger from sonic boom and it is missing in the carecter section can somebody please add it? Connorj2341 (talk) 15:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- She's already on the list. At the bottom, at List of Sonic the Hedgehog characters#Sticks the Badger. Sergecross73 msg me 16:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you i did not see it Connorj2341 (talk) 15:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Shadow the Hedgehog
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I'm merging shadow the hedgehog into list of sonic characters! 2A02:842A:864E:E101:C898:A18A:CBC0:55D9 (talk) 14:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose No merge reason stated or convincing argument to merge the article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose and suggest Speedy Close No reasoning given and article seems fine as is.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2023
Fang the "Sniper" is now called Fang the "Hunter" by official sources (even in Japanese), his section name (as in the headliner called Fang the Sniper) in this article should reflect that. 155.4.59.43 (talk) 04:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
I believe it is about time for Amy Rose to have her own article
I believe this article about Amy Rose is ready for publication. Amy Rose is notable. She has been around since 1993, i.e., for 30 years at the time of writing this. That is enough time for people to be aware of her existence. Amy has been a playable character in multiple games, a major non-playable character in others, and has been featured in a plethora of other media. What will it take for her to have her own article? I believe enough years have passed, a bunch of reliable sources have been cited, and sufficient edits have been made for this article to be polished to a level where it is ready to be published and viewed by the general public. Will it take her appearance in a future feature-length film for this article to be published? If anyone disagrees, please feel free to provide your explanation as to why Amy can't have her own article. I would love to hear it, but with all due respect, I truly hope a consensus is reached where everyone agrees that she should have her own separate article before another decade goes by. Happyblackcat (talk) 20:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- On Wikipedia, whether or not a subject has its own article isn't dependent on how many games or films they appear in. It's whether or not it meets the WP:GNG. I'd recommend looking into the reasons her article was eliminated before, and providing evidence on how things have changed, instead, as that would be far more persuasive. I can dig up past discussions for you if you're serious about pursuing this. Sergecross73 msg me 00:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)