Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Cassianto/Archive 13) (bot |
Ritchie333 (talk | contribs) →November 2015: aw jeez, not this again |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
:::My templating of {{u|MSGJ}} was intentional; if they treat me like an idiot, then they should expect me to do the same. They might also learn something, as they clearly haven't got a fucking clue what warring is. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">[[User:Cassianto|<font face="Papyrus">Cassianto</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cassianto#top|<font face="Papyrus">Talk</font>]]</sup></span>''' 01:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC) |
:::My templating of {{u|MSGJ}} was intentional; if they treat me like an idiot, then they should expect me to do the same. They might also learn something, as they clearly haven't got a fucking clue what warring is. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">[[User:Cassianto|<font face="Papyrus">Cassianto</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cassianto#top|<font face="Papyrus">Talk</font>]]</sup></span>''' 01:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
::That Skyfall is a [[Four Million Smiles|million laughs]], isn't it. But just in case [[The Darling Buds of May (TV series)|Pop Larkin]] gets too intense for you... 48 Hours, eh? ... how [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVt8ornGzIM exciting] !! [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 22:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC) |
::That Skyfall is a [[Four Million Smiles|million laughs]], isn't it. But just in case [[The Darling Buds of May (TV series)|Pop Larkin]] gets too intense for you... 48 Hours, eh? ... how [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVt8ornGzIM exciting] !! [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 22:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
{{ping|MSGJ}} I would like to unblock Cassianto - he was in the middle of a helpful peer review so we can get [[The Beatles (album)]] to FAC, and [[Talk:Calshot Castle/GA1|yet again]] I see somebody seeking a review to improve quality (in this instance, me) suddenly has those efforts torpedoed by a block they had nothing to do with. In this instance, Cassianto did not violate 3RR; though he did revert three times, after his third revert he tried to defuse the issue on Thewolfchild's talk, and then went to report the issue. As far as I know, that's the ''right'' thing to do, so unless there's been a conversation where Cassianto has said (to paraphrase) "screw you, I'm reverting anyway" that I've missed, then the block seems superfluous. However, I will say - [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassianto&diff=prev&oldid=691390472 please don't do this]. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 10:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:03, 20 November 2015
SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
Please leave a message; I'll reply here.
noteI know that I've disagreed with you in the past. If I've said anything that was offensive to you, I do apologize. I do truly and honestly appreciate all the hard work you do to provide good content to this project. I haven't said it before, so I say it now: Thank you. — Ched : ? 21:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
GD's crystal ball.I've seen this coming. In November 2014, I advised & pleaded with Arbcom, to not ban anybody at the end of the GGTF case. My advice shouldn't have been overlooked. :( GoodDay (talk) 22:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
RE RO:Suggest no longer interacting with Lynn or KG except in regards to RO's behaviour. No point in indulging their activism. Only in death does duty end (talk) 11:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Kev's pageGlad you saw it; blink of an eye and you miss it these days. Giano (talk) 20:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
A kitten for you!Jesus loves you! Elizium23 (talk) 02:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Talk:Skyfall. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} .During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
@MSGJ: I would like to unblock Cassianto - he was in the middle of a helpful peer review so we can get The Beatles (album) to FAC, and yet again I see somebody seeking a review to improve quality (in this instance, me) suddenly has those efforts torpedoed by a block they had nothing to do with. In this instance, Cassianto did not violate 3RR; though he did revert three times, after his third revert he tried to defuse the issue on Thewolfchild's talk, and then went to report the issue. As far as I know, that's the right thing to do, so unless there's been a conversation where Cassianto has said (to paraphrase) "screw you, I'm reverting anyway" that I've missed, then the block seems superfluous. However, I will say - please don't do this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC) |