Celia Homeford (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Celia Homeford|Celia Homeford]] ([[User talk:Celia Homeford|talk]]) 15:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC) |
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Celia Homeford|Celia Homeford]] ([[User talk:Celia Homeford|talk]]) 15:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
::The thing that frustrates me is you get editors complaining over the sourcing, so you add the "don't edit this article" tag and then add sources .... for the unhappy editors to then again remove the template which means you then edit conflict with everyone and create one huge mess, I apologise for the language {{u|Celia Homeford}} I've had a really rubbish day and this hasn't helped, I've since disengaged from the article and shall do for the foreseeable future. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 15:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Edit-warring (again) == |
== Edit-warring (again) == |
Revision as of 15:15, 24 April 2018
- Home
- Talk
- Contributions
- Barnstars / Other Awards
• 2010 |
|
|
Confused about the Freight Rover 200 & 300 Series
@Davey2010: Out of curiosity I was trying to look and see if there was any examples of Freight Rover 200 & 300 Series on the web. But all I ended up with is the Freight Rover Sherpa series. Was it at one point were Freight Rovers without the Sherpa name and has a different badge? --Vauxford (talk) 06:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Vauxford, Truth be told I've never understood the whole Sherpa thing ..... Some go by 2/3/400 series and others have the Sherpa name on the end, Having taken a look at this it would seem the 2/3/400 all had Sherpa on the end .... just the article doesn't show it ?, As I said I honestly have no idea sorry, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Understandable. Freight Rover/LDV was always confusing when it comes to there production, might be the reason why they went out of business. --Vauxford (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Very true!, I'd assume the name certainly didn't help them in the end - Would've been more sensible to launch a new "facelifted" van with a new name but there we are, Anyway sorry I couldn't of been more help, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Poland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2018)
The Wikipedia Fried potatoes article is presently a Disambiguation page that has been identified as qualifying for a standalone article.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Spanish transition to democracy • Sponge (material) Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Tech News: 2018-17
18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Surtsicna situation
I note that the edit warring on the Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge continues. Had you thought it was over? LE (talk) 23:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi LE, Well I had hoped so but apparently not, I would suggest either add the diffs on to the current report or file a new one, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for appreciating my points on the redirect. ● Thane — 00:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Thane, No worries, Thanks for making me see the light lol, Happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 01:43, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Please don't use the F word
...at Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Many users will consider it a breach of Wikipedia:Civility. Thanks. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Go and fuck yourself. –Davey2010Talk 15:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Chill the fuck out Davey. GMGtalk 15:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- The thing that frustrates me is you get editors complaining over the sourcing, so you add the "don't edit this article" tag and then add sources .... for the unhappy editors to then again remove the template which means you then edit conflict with everyone and create one huge mess, I apologise for the language Celia Homeford I've had a really rubbish day and this hasn't helped, I've since disengaged from the article and shall do for the foreseeable future. –Davey2010Talk 15:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Edit-warring (again)
Your recent editing history at Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)