You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today. |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
Talk archives:
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Current RfAdminship
This Month in Education: December 2013
If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.
I have just finished my wiki article.Professor, I am Sanha Lee. I have just finished my wiki assignment. [[1]] is my wiki article Then, I hope that you will check my assignment. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tksgk262 (talk • contribs) 23:08, December 26, 2013 (UTC) This Month in Education: January 2014
If this message is not on your home wiki's talk page, update your subscription.
WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
February 2014Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daedongyeojido may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Martin Franzkowiak may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC) DYK for Żywoty świętychPlease acceptDYK for Devotional articlesDYK for Katowice historic train stationYour GA nomination of Roman DmowskiHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roman Dmowski you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC) see talk page on Durkheimsee talk page on Durkheim128.214.173.46 (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC) About Fast interrupt requestThanks for the help there, Piotrus! It certainly does have "insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject", and I'm certainly one of them. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Re: Mexican Native troutDYK is on the agenda. I've got all the stuff to expand. Created the article in response to on-going review of Rainbow trout at FAC. Thanks. --Mike Cline (talk) 13:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC) RfAFYI. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Wiki KittenThank you! Yoninah (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC) MS Morska WolaJeśli możesz rozwinąć, to będzie świetnie. Ja z tego co mam w ręce więcej "nie wyduszę" :( - o handlowych mam tylko Piwowońskiego Byłoby w sumie mieć polski statek w tutejszym czywieszu :)--Felis domestica (talk) 19:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC) WW II reader feed back numbersThe numbers can be found by hitting the "reader comments" link at the top of the WWII page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ArticleFeedbackv5/World_War_II?ref=article&filter=featured Most of the user complaints were similar to what I also considered as problems with the WWII article. The text is ver dry; just chronologically listing the order of military campaigns, and shying away from presenting the true brutality of the conflict. In fact, as an example; the WWI article does a very good job of showing all aspects of the war; from military engagements, to the civilian casualties. When I started to edit the WWII page a few days ago. There was not single picture of Stalin, Roosvelt, Concentration Camps, and still no image of a Swastica (that got removed). The article just lists facts without any consideration of scope. The section War breaks out in Europe (1939–40) started out by saying: "On 1 September 1939, Germany and Slovakia invaded Poland". Really, that just might be a deliberate blurring of event details. Yes, the Slovaks did invite, but when stated in such a way, a reader who is unfamiliar with the events of WWII might think that both countries were equal belligerents; and this is the problem with this article, no context is given. no clear separation between aggressors and victims, and the most difficult subject matter explained in a encyclopedic language with out any context. --Factor01 (talk) 21:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Floriańska StreetLonnie Stabler articleWould you leave a comment at the entry page. Thanks, Billy Hathorn (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lonnie_Stabler Disambiguation link notification for February 11Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daedongyeojido, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC) Hi!Hi! I was wondering how I could be eligible to become an admin. I do realize I have a long way to go but I have goals. Please reply! PS I have been an admin/moderator on forums before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CatcherStorm (talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Main project!Sure! Me and Vivi keep working on it! On the exactly moment that we finish the first complete version of it we'll send you a message for the assessment. Thank you once more for all the help and support on this project! We really appreciate everything. Best regards, --Fredderico18 (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC) NoticeThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship.2FPiotrus_3.E2.80.8E_edit_warring. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC) WithdrawlCan you clarify, is this your withdrawl or do you plan to post another? I'm standing by to courtesy blank the talk page and RFA whenever it closes.--v/r - TP 19:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC) You've got mail!Hello, Piotrus. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 00:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. |