Delivering Vol. 5, Issue 19 of Wikipedia Signpost (BOT) |
John Carter (talk | contribs) →Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse: new section |
||
Line 1,281: | Line 1,281: | ||
<small>Delivered by [[User:SoxBot|SoxBot]] ([[User talk:SoxBot|talk]]) at 22:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
<small>Delivered by [[User:SoxBot|SoxBot]] ([[User talk:SoxBot|talk]]) at 22:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)</small> |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse]] == |
|||
Sir, I have been in contact with Mattisse regarding the above arbitration. Mattisse has indicated that it may be necessary to present evidence regarding a previous matter in which you were able to identify several sock puppets who were hounding them. Mattisse indicates that they find the matter to be still at least somewhat grating to this day. I was wondering whether you would be willing to present some evidence regarding that matter should the case develop in such a way that such evidence is indicated. Thank you for your attention in this matter. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 00:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:32, 12 May 2009
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/41/Flag_of_India.svg/40px-Flag_of_India.svg.png)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/41/Flag_of_India.svg/40px-Flag_of_India.svg.png)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/41/Flag_of_India.svg/40px-Flag_of_India.svg.png)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/41/Flag_of_India.svg/40px-Flag_of_India.svg.png)
FOR ANONS, I WILL DEFINITELY REPLY HERE. FOR EVERYBODY ELSE, THIS MAY BE HERE OR AT YOUR TALK PAGE. IF IT IS A MULTI-PARTY DISCUSSION, THEN DEFINITELY HERE
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2a/Blnguyen_tet.jpg/500px-Blnguyen_tet.jpg)
Requests
- Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park - Genghiskhanviet (talk · contribs)
- Economy of the Republic of Vietnam - Genghiskhanviet (talk · contribs)
- Michigan State University Group - Kevin Forsyth (talk · contribs)
- Nguyen Tri Phuong - Magnifier (talk · contribs)
- Phan Thanh Gian - Magnifier (talk · contribs)
- Vietnam War - Wandalstouring (talk · contribs)
- Cyril de Zoysa - Pectore (talk · contribs)
- User:Garden/WikiCup
Checkuser and sockpuppetry
I don't know if I'm interpreting the samspade and geolocate result correctly. Does this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.148.16.137 look like the same person as this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/209.30.128.209 Because it sure does to me. Dan (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I should point out, that first IP address posting from Ekky's location is the one falsely calling himself "Will in China", as he confirms at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Thelema/Rabelais/talk&diff=next&oldid=282243475 . And I've checked those user-location tools enough now to remove all my doubt. Dan (talk) 21:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
User:Truthbody also looks suspicious to me, though that one could definitely be a different person. Dan (talk) 17:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Vassyana has IDed WiC apparently, so Nishkid tells me. Very convenient for me. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 03:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
It's all good. 76.213.248.180 has done nothing much yet but looks mighty suspicious from a technical standpoint. Dan (talk) 05:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Straw poll for selecting pics of 2008 cricketers
Photos were taken at the team parade at the training for ODIs in January/February 2009 at Adelaide Oval.
Unlike the Indian team last year, they actually took training seriously. They were all very gentlemanly. Very dignified and genial. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 07:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Voting section
Simply vote and comment as follows below the individual sections.
- Comment (numbering pictures from 1, 2, 3 etc, left to right) and ~~~~
Poll: Tim Southee bowling
- 1 - I like the ball being visible in the photo. Also, face not obscured by net. Pdfpdf (talk) 10:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 5: by far the best composition and color balance. DurovaCharge! 04:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- 5 is excellent for showing his action - even to the extent of clearly showing his fingers and the seam. --195.194.4.65 (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- 5 per above. Any of the first four at fish. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Tim Southee
- 3 - nice smile Pdfpdf (talk) 10:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 3 DurovaCharge! 04:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- 3 no question. --195.194.4.65 (talk) 16:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- 1. The third is too close to the camera. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Peter Fulton
- 3 if it were darker; 5 because it is darker; 3rd choice: 4. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 5 DurovaCharge! 04:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Although what looks like a giant cup is a bit disconcerting. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Neil Broom
- 0 - not too keen on any of them. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 3 - needs histogram balanced to brighten it a touch. DurovaCharge! 04:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Brightest. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:29, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Martin Guptill
- probably 2 Pdfpdf (talk) 11:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 3 DurovaCharge! 04:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- 3. The other pics indicate that he's another guy who doesn't like yellow monkeys.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Ken "KG" Cunningham
- 2 - Oh dear. He's not ageing well, is he. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:10, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 05:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- 2. The other pic at Tip of the tongue.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jeetan Patel
- 0 Pdfpdf (talk) 11:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2, but not by much. DurovaCharge! 05:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- 3. The second pic at Sneeze.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jeetan Patel bowling
- 0 Pdfpdf (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 3 the only one where his face isn't obstructed. DurovaCharge! 05:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Grant Elliott
- maybe 2 if it were darker? Pdfpdf (talk) 11:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 05:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Craig Cumming
Poll: Trent Boult bowling
- Hard one! 1 has ball in it; 2 is better, but no ball; 3 has great shot of ball, but not so good of Trent. 1 or 2 Pdfpdf (talk) 11:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 05:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Brendon Diamanti bowling
- tossup - maybe 1 Pdfpdf (talk) 11:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 05:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Brendon Diamanti fielding
Poll: Ashley Mallett
Poll: Albie Morkel
Poll: Ben_Hilfenhaus bowling
- 4 - Best full expression. Aaroncrick(Tassie Boy talk) 07:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Action with ball in frame. DurovaCharge! 05:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Cameron White bowling
Poll: Dale Steyn
Poll: Dale Steyn bowling
Poll: David Hussey bowling
Poll: David Hussey
Poll: Hashim Amla
also File:Hisham Amla 589192.jpg
Poll: Herschelle Gibbs fielding
Poll: Herschelle Gibbs
Poll: Jacques Kallis
Poll: Johan Botha bowling
Poll: Johan Botha fielding
Poll: Johan Botha
Poll: JP Duminy bowling
Poll: JP Duminy
Poll: Les Burdett
Poll: Makhaya Ntini
Poll: Makhaya Ntini bowling
Poll: Mark Boucher
Poll: Mickey Arthur
Poll: Mike Hussey bowling
Poll: Mike Hussey
- 1 (don't like any of them though) DurovaCharge! 04:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mike Young
Poll: Mitchell Johnson bowling
Poll: Morne Morkel bowling
Poll: Morne Morkel
Poll: Nathan Hauritz bowling
- 2 - Hard to tell the difference! (I guess that means he's consistent!!) Pdfpdf (talk) 11:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - Much of a muchness. He consistently bowled crap yesterday! Aaroncrick(Tassie Boy talk) 05:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 04:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nathan Hauritz
Poll: Neil McKenzie
- 1 needs cropping top and left, and levels balanced though. DurovaCharge! 04:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Shaun Marsh
Poll: Shaun Tait bowling
Poll: shaun Tait
- 3 not by much though; basically a tossup. DurovaCharge! 04:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- 1. When you see the full version of 3 it's not as attractive. Tschravic (talk) 07:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Tim Nielsen bowling
Poll: Wayne Parnell bowling
Poll: Vaughn van Jaarsveld
Poll: Lonwabo Tsotsobe bowling
Poll: Lonwabo Tsotsobe
Poll: Andrew Hilditch
Straw poll for selecting photos of cyclists at the 2009 Tour Down Under
Photos were taken at the team parade at the start of the 2009 Tour Down Under, January 18, 2008.
They were all very gentlemanly. Very dignified and genial. So were the crowd. Apart from the middle-aged man who stood net to the YellowMonkey and intentionally jabbed him in the ribs for about an hour. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
The crowd favourites, judged by the decibel level of the applause, were in no particular order, Armstrong, Hincapie, Pereiro, Greipel, Voigt, O'Grady, Michael Rogers, McEwen, Baden Cooke, Bobridge (local boy). YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Voting section
Simply vote and comment as follows below the individual sections.
- Comment (numbering pictures from 1, 2, 3 etc, left to right) and ~~~~
Poll: Cameron Meyer
- No. 2 tossup; not crazy about either. DurovaCharge! 16:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Not crazy about either but have a strong aversion to semi-constipated looks. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - 2 is the better of these. Cirt (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 0. Pdfpdf (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 --—Sandahl (talk) 23:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No preference. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Lesser of two evils. Sarvagnya 21:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - but it's close. Privatemusings (talk) 00:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1, but cut off the bottom part. Khoikhoi 04:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1, with tighter cropping. - Bilby (talk) 07:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2, but it would need cropping. --vi5in[talk] 23:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- 1. probably Chadsnook (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Davide Malacarne
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - Best framing of the bunch. Cirt (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. don't like the smile in 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 4 eyes open, less harsh profile than 1 or 2. DurovaCharge! 05:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Number 4 is best.—Sandahl (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Less grainy. Sarvagnya 21:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Khoikhoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4 -- Samir 06:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- First choice 2, second choice 4, third choice 1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4 vi5in[talk] 23:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2. 4 looks almost as good. Chadsnook (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 4. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Davide Vigano
- 4 - Best full expression and view of face. Cirt (talk) 03:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 4 per above. DurovaCharge! 05:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 —Sandahl (talk) 05:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 5. Clearer, sharper and frontal enough. Sarvagnya 21:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 5. Daniel (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 5 is the best. Khoikhoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 5 -- Samir 06:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4 vi5in[talk] 23:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- 5 hard to choose between 4 and 5, but 5 is clearer. Chadsnook (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 5. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Francis van Londersele
- 2 - But might want to crop to just the head/shoulders, the hand is a bit bright/blurry. Cirt (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 Less open expression, but better lighting and focus. DurovaCharge! 05:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Durova.—Sandahl (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Lesser of two evils. Sarvagnya 21:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1, I guess. Khoikhoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Frederick Willems
- 1. Although 3 is a better pic, he looks better in 1. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 2 the only one with tolerably even lighting. DurovaCharge! 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 because of best lighting.—Sandahl (talk) 05:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 is the lesser of 3 evils. Khoikhoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 06:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Lighting. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: George Hincapie
- 4. Although there's a hint of a smile in 3, 4 is brighter. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 3 more dynamic composition, better facial expression. DurovaCharge! 05:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 brighter —Sandahl (talk) 02:12, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 for the profile pic, but you might consider including the last one in the article as well. Khoikhoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4 -- Samir 06:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- First choice 5, second choice 4. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Y not? 03:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 3. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Gert Steegmans
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. frontal.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 best view of face. DurovaCharge! 05:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 best angle on face.—Sandahl (talk) 05:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Khoikhoi 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4 sorry dude -- Samir 06:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 4. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Gianni da Ros
- 1. Close call, but looks a bit funny in 2 and has too much armor in 3--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 3 going against the flow here and picking the shot with sunglasses. Although it shows less of the face, the lighting, composition, and color balance is far superior to either alternative. DurovaCharge! 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 could be a little lighter.—Sandahl (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Khoikhoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 06:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 3, despite the glasses and headgear. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Greg Henderson
- 3. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 3 Wish you had been standing four feet to the right for this shot. DurovaCharge! 05:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 looks more composed.—Sandahl (talk) 05:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Khoikhoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 06:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Henrik Redant
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. 1 prefer the composition. Close call between all 3 choices. DurovaCharge! 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2, he looks ridiculous in 1. Khoikhoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 06:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jacopo Guarnieri
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Tough call, but 2 if you crop it. Khoikhoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jesus Hernandez
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Khoikhoi 07:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 or 3. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jos van Emden
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 06:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jose Luis Rubiera
- 0. Strange "hat". Is it some form of helmet? Pdfpdf (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1, I guess.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 or none.—Sandahl (talk) 21:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 --Chadsnook (talk) 05:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- 1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jose Rojas
- 4.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 —Sandahl (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 -- Samir 06:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Juan Horrach
- 1, I guess.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 face less obscured.—Sandahl (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Julian Dean
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 21:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 09:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Julien el Fares
- 1. Nicer smile.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 21:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- 2. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 09:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Jussi Veikkanen
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 06:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Kai Reus
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1, then 4. Don't like 2; too much crotch prominence.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm. I hadn't noticed - I was looking at the top 2/3 of the picture ... Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 or 4 —Sandahl (talk) 01:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1, 4 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Kasper Klostergaard
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 21:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 06:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Kenny de Hayes
- 3. Don't like the weird look in 1 and the faraway look in 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 06:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Kym Dillon
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 more relaxed looking.—Sandahl (talk) 01:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 06:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Lance Armstrong
- 2 Not picking anything in his face! Bastique demandez
- 2. First guy here that I heard of.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 23:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
1 for sure2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 06:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Laurent Biondi
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 - could be a tighter shot with arm cropped out.—Sandahl (talk) 21:52, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 06:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Laurent Lefevre
- 2. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. #1 might be placed here.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 06:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Luca Barla
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Luis Leon Sanchez
2 and 3 were the same - 2 replaced with new photo.
- 3 is wee clearer then 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 06:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Maciej Bodnar
- 1 Bastique demandez
- 1. The other at Traffic Cops.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 06:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Y not? 03:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mario Aerts
- 2. (However, the lass in #1 has a nice smile ... ) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Bastique demandez
- 1. Hello! Are you guys blind? Did you not notice the person behind him?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pardon? What did you think "(However, the lass in #1 has a nice smile ... )" was about? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Didn't notice. Musta been distracted by sumtin :D --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pardon? What did you think "(However, the lass in #1 has a nice smile ... )" was about? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4, easy -- Samir 06:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mark Renshaw
- 2 better lighting, pose Bastique demandez
- 2 per above. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2—Sandahl (talk) 01:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Markus Eichler
- 2 better quality Bastique demandez
- 2. The other pic might be placed here.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Martin Elmiger
- 2 Bastique demandez
- 2 notwithstanding the microphone, it's clearer. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Martin Muller
- 2 Both are good but the lighting is better in 2 than 1 Bastique demandez
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 it's a bit brighter.—Sandahl (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mathew Hayman
- 3 Best expression Bastique demandez 03:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. I actually suspect his expression doesn't really change. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 is best —Sandahl (talk) 01:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 05:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mathieu Drujon
- 1 Great smile Bastique demandez 03:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 01:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Matteo Bono
- 2 Obstruction in 1 Bastique demandez 03:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Don't like the teeth-situation in 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 01:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Matteo Tosatto
- 3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 Great shot --Bastique demandez 03:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Looks better in this one.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 05:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Matthew Goss
- 2 1 is better quality but that tongue ruins it. Bastique demandez 03:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above. 1 might be more a good pic for this article.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per Bastique —Sandahl (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 despite tongue -- Samir 05:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Matt White (cyclist)
- 1 Dimensions are terrible on 2. Bastique demandez 03:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- This guy obviously does not like yellow monkeys.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 0 as per brewcrewer Pdfpdf (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- crop 2. -- Y not? 03:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Maxim Iglinskiy
- 2 Bastique demandez 03:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. The other is too in-your-face.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 looks a little like a mugshot but it's OK.—Sandahl (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Michael Rogers
- 1. It is a different pose from nearly all the others. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. This is a wonderful shot. Bastique demandez 03:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 nice shot of profile.—Sandahl (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Mickael Buffaz
- 1 Best expression. Bastique demandez 03:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nicki Sorensen
- 3 best expression Bastique demandez 03:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy makeover -- Y not? 03:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nicolas Portal
- 3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Best face shot. Bastique demandez 03:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Toss up. Looks better in 1 but 3 is a better pic.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nicolas Roche
- 1 better lighting of the two Bastique demandez 03:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Baseball cap hides too much of the other one.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 00:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 05:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Nikolay Trusov
- 2 Eyes are closed in 1 Bastique demandez 03:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Cirt (talk) 05:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Oscar Pereiro
- 3 Bastique demandez 03:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3, but I would erase that terrible vertical line with Gimp or Photoshop.--Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 09:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Pablo Lastras
- 1 Bastique demandez 03:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, 1 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Cirt (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Paul Sherwen
- 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. DurovaCharge! 06:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Cirt (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Perrig Quemeneur
- Both are same images –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1.
No, I changed my mind. Now 2. Again 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC) - 0. Hey Brewcrewer, what about #3?? (They all look constipated to me.) Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Marginal preference for 3. DurovaCharge! 06:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- no preference, all the same. ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 05:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 05:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Perrig Quemeneur - take 2
- Hmmm. Hard one. Either #0 or #2 Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 per above.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. DurovaCharge! 06:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Cirt (talk) 05:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Pieter Jacobs
- 3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 DurovaCharge! 06:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 Cirt (talk) 05:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 05:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Rein Taaramae
- Don't like either, but 2 might be good for Cracking joints.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 06:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 05:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Phil Liggett
- 2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 06:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Remy di Gregorio
- 2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. The other at overbite.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Crop the bottom third and adjust the levels. DurovaCharge! 05:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Rene Mandri
- 2–Capricorn42 (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 05:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Rick Flens
- 2 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 05:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 00:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Ronny Scholz
- 3 Although the background it too bright, the profile and smile are nicer.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 with levels adjustment. DurovaCharge! 05:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Cirt (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 05:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Rony Martias
- 1. Less scrunchy.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 better lighting, equally grimaced expression. DurovaCharge! 05:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Scott Davis (cyclist)
- 0. Don't like either much, but both are MUCH better the the photo on Scott Davis (cyclist)!! Pdfpdf (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- (And what's he doing using our Scott's name?!) Pdfpdf (talk) 09:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Gun to my head, I would go with 2.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep the existing photo. DurovaCharge! 05:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Cirt (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3, sorry -- Samir 05:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3-- Y not? 03:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Sean Yates
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 05:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Sergey Klimov
- 3 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 DurovaCharge! 05:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 05:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Sergio de Lis
- 1, –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 DurovaCharge! 05:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Stef Clement
- 3. The least frowning.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 DurovaCharge! 05:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 Cirt (talk) 23:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 -- Samir 05:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Thierry Bricaud
- 1 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 05:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 ~ BB 01:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Cirt (talk) 23:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Thomas Rohregger
- I think we should stick with the current pic.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Current pic. DurovaCharge! 04:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 Cirt (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4. Sorry dude -- Samir 05:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Timmy Duggan
- Nah.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ditto. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 04:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Timothy Gudsell
- 1 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Better smile.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 for the lighting. DurovaCharge! 04:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Tom Leezer
- It's really a toss-up. This is the second toughest decision I've ever made (there was this donuts incident), but I guess I'll go with 1.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 04:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, it's twins...wait, nevermind. 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Travis Meyer
- 0. (Did he come last?) Pdfpdf (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 04:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 -- Samir 05:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- 4 -- Y not? 15:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Vitaliy Buts
- 1 (cropped) –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Nice smile! I like all three. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. DurovaCharge! 04:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 Cirt (talk) 23:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Samir 05:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Vittorio Algeri
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 04:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 Cirt (talk) 23:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 -- Samir 05:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Volodymyr Zagorodniy
- 3. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 DurovaCharge! 04:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 3. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 23:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 4 -- Samir 05:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Wesley Sulzberger
- 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 04:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 Cirt (talk) 23:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Samir 05:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Willem Stroetinga
- Number 1 -- Samir 07:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 –Capricorn42 (talk) 05:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 --Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 21:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 04:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 04:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 has better expression. Cirt (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Yoann Offredo
- Number 2 -- Samir 07:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 -- Tinu Cherian - 06:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- 0. Pdfpdf (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 DurovaCharge! 04:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 —Sandahl (talk) 04:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2. —97198 (talk) 07:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- 2 but crop it to head/shoulders. Cirt (talk) 23:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Poll: Alison Carle
Added at the request of Brewcrewer (talk · contribs) and Pdfpdf (talk · contribs):
- 1. Obviously. I had some suggestions for the other pic but I'm trying to be a little classy these days.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- (Given Brewcrewer's new found predilection towards trying to be a little classy, my safest option is to attempt to refrain from putting my foot in my mouth. Hence, I will make no comment. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC))
- P.S. YellowMonkey: Thanks for the additional photos. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. DurovaCharge! 04:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 05:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 —Sandahl (talk) 04:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 1 if you can crop it. Cirt (talk) 23:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Uno -- Samir 05:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Everything else
1949 Wisden
I'll have a go, but I'm away from books for the next 48 hours. Will try when I get back (small chance I may return a bit earlier). Johnlp (talk) 07:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, unlikely to be back for any length of time until Tuesday next... RL gets in the way. Johnlp (talk) 22:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Do you still need this? Am kind of back in harness and can do if you need. But I have the impression you may have it sorted. Johnlp (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- yes please YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 03:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- In my contribs list are a couple of trial images to see if they're good enough resolution for you to use. It would probably be easier for me to email the others to you. If you send me an email (I have email enabled through WP) then I'll reply attaching as many as I can fit on across as many emails as it needs. I may not get around to this until the weekend (though my Saturday ticket for Lord's is looking very worthless!). Johnlp (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Very visible YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 01:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ping me an email, then, and I'll do the deed. Uploading them on here is fraught with danger, as the copyright vulturebots are already circling over the two I did upload. (Quite rightly too, I should add.) Johnlp (talk) 07:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Very visible YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 01:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- In my contribs list are a couple of trial images to see if they're good enough resolution for you to use. It would probably be easier for me to email the others to you. If you send me an email (I have email enabled through WP) then I'll reply attaching as many as I can fit on across as many emails as it needs. I may not get around to this until the weekend (though my Saturday ticket for Lord's is looking very worthless!). Johnlp (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- yes please YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 03:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Do you still need this? Am kind of back in harness and can do if you need. But I have the impression you may have it sorted. Johnlp (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Sure YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 00:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes I see
Hey! I see, nothing is consistent out there, so it's a bit frustrating. "a couple of wins over two hopeless teams" - which teams? Shahid • Talk2me 07:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Rajasthan Royals and Bangalore. Bangalore is especially hopeless YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 00:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
1948 tour
I think I have O'Reilly's Cricket Conquest. Not very sure, will check and reply (it is at my parents' place on the other side of India). Tintin 11:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- It might be in my library YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 00:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Books on the 1948 tour
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. TBH, I don't really know about any books on the 1948 tour that are much good. Farewell to cricket is a start I guess. Brightly fades the Don by Fingleton is another. After that, I am drawing a bit of a blank. Newspapers from the 50th anniversary in 1998 may have something (not sure what the 'tiser will have). Unlike modern days, it doesn't seem every man and his dog felt the need to publish a tour diary!
Very busy this week at work and at home, but work on Claggy will start again shortly. Great work as always on the IPL on your blog. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 08:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ok thanks. Yes Mallett is pretty slack with accuracy, but a good raconteur and analyst. He says "Gauhati" instead Guwahati and got a few venues mixed up in his 69-70 tour of India in the Walters book. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 01:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately people only read teh article when I criticise KRR. Then all the Bengalis turn up! YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 01:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Is it possible he is a sock of a banned user? Mitsube (talk) 07:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- No but he has another account YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 01:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Ron Saggers with the Australian cricket team refs
I changed the reference system for the article because I saw the way it was handled before was disliked in the FA review. Perhaps you want to put that system into your other, similar articles to avoid the long strings of references. And also, your talk page nearly crashes my PC :( Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Request
Hello Mr YellowMonkey.
Would you mind adding (some) sentence(s) which regard to Vo Tanh into the article Gia Long? I don't know how to do it because the current article's paragraphs are too closed.--Amore Mio (talk) 05:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sure I'll do it. Your articles will be on DYK soon, well done. I've just copyedited it and tweaked a few things so that long ndashes are used for number ranges instead of simple hyphens and the cites are all the same format. Also in English, "," is used for thousands, millions and billions rather than "." YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 05:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Are you planning to write more on teh Tay Son- Nguyen war? YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 05:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- First, thank for your help.
- Yes, this is my dream but I should learn more before I were capable to make it true. I planned to write about the whole civil war, including Tay Son-Nguyen lords, Tay Son-Le&Trinh, foreign inventions...
- FYI, about the scholars whose books I used:
- Phan Khoang was the Head of Department of History, University of Literature of Saigon (Republic of Vietnam). He is well-known in western academic world [1].
- Ta Chi Dai Truong is also a famous pre-1975 scholar. One of his book, Lịch sử nội chiến Việt Nam 1771-1802, brought him a lot of trouble [2] but it was republished again in Vietnam in 2007. University of Michigan still holds one copy of this book
- Huynh Minh is also a well-known pre-1975 history-reseacher. Some of his book became the references in this book.
- --Amore Mio (talk) 14:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- thanks for the book. Do people get in trouble for reading his "reactionary" works? YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 03:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know much about it and my lecturers always evaded to answer or talked around when I asked them about it. But as far as I know, everyone are free to read, free to use it as reference or do anything they want as long as you don't drag the government's things into the topic. The censorship, particularly in history study, is existent but not as strict as it used to be (for example, new version of historical textbook stopped calling Gia Long "reactionary feudal ruler"). Moreover, I still could find some pre-1975 books in state-libraries and old-book stores. --Amore Mio (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have just added them into the contest. Thank for your guide.--Amore Mio (talk) 09:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I have just changed all infoboxes.--Amore Mio (talk) 05:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- I added some citations from book to the article Thich Quang Duc, feel free to revert if they are unnesesary.--Amore Mio (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Unblock request of Internet Scholar
Hello YellowMonkey. Internet Scholar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, Sandstein 16:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Comment: It's not quite clear whether this sockpuppet has been used abusively, as required for a block per WP:SOCK. Thanks, Sandstein 16:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think it's appropriate to split his edits like that so that he can spread the reverts around and give an incomplete history of his editing on the same topic. I think it's pertinent if someone edits wars that people know that they have a history on a sister article, so to speak, which is the case here. The sock is one IDed on the userpage. CU confrimed and he confessed anyway. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 05:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Doug Ring in 1948
I think you meant to tell me that Ring is at PR, not FAC. We have a slight backlog there at the momemt, so don't be surprised if it's a few days before Doug gets picked up. I assure you he will be. Brianboulton (talk) 08:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- yep, thanks YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 03:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Silly Hilditch.... again
It wouldn't surprise me if Lee plays the first ashes test and gets smashed all round the place. Boony needs to speak up and get off he lazy ass for once, or at least another selector does. When Boony retired, he worked at a bank here in Launceston, Tasmania and he did jack all, just sat at the back eating lol! From what I've seen and heard he's a fairly laid back sorta bloke and wouldn't want to make a big drama. What I'm trying to say is, we need selectors that are prepared to stand up to Hildich and voice their opinions. Maybe they are currently doing so, but are being shut down. Reliable sources tell me both Boony and Cox have been unhappy with the selections of late, as word of mouth gets around quickly in Tassie.
It's disappointing that Gayle has only just arrived in London for the first test. As captain you would think he could do better. But I suppose he's West Indian! It's going to be very cold for them over in England considering it's only late spring. Aaroncrick(Tassie Boy talk) 10:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I must admit I laughed when I read CobaltBlueTony's reply especially "calling someone a "silly hilditch" -- which, I have to confess, I have no idea what that means." I think "silly hilditch" might have a chance of catching on as a mild insult to describe someone (like Andrew H) who is confused, vacillitory, prone to random judgements and generally woolly headed. It certainly describes the Chairman of Selectors to a "T" -- Mattinbgn\talk 07:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey
First, congrats on finally restoring the userpage, or maybe recreating would be a better word. Shahrukh's team has lost it, hasn't it? I don't really understand how it works, I mean, how they conclude who the winners are. The team which has the most wins or what?
- Two points for a win, 1 for draw/tie/no result. If equal on points they use net run rate. Top four go to semifinals. 1st v 4th, 2 v 3. Then they get in the final. Yes, I think Punjab are stuffed now that James Hopes has been ruled out. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 01:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
What did you think about Main Hoon Na? Let me guess: silly, long, partly funny...? :) Shahid • Talk2me 08:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Funny a bit silly and over the top. Expecially Amrita Rao and Zayed Khan... oh well YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 01:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hehehe LOL!!! Well said. That's exactly what I thought of it. Thanks for the explanation. Shahid • Talk2me 10:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Regarding reverting of my recent edits
First of all, why do you use such a crude language? How can you use the word ridiculous? How can you just revert all my edits? Whatever I had written were all facts and they definitely weren’t biased. If you have any doubts or questions about my edits, why don’t you clarify them with me?Kesangh (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Not crude language YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 00:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Happy Vesak!
Blessings are coming your way too, my friend. Thanks so much for thinking of me and sending your fine photo.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ea/Candle-powered_prayerwheel.jpg/300px-Candle-powered_prayerwheel.jpg)
John Hill (talk) 08:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Happy Vesak to you too! Mitsube (talk) 16:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
GA Sweeps invitation
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
I saw some of your loverly article writings and am wondering if you could help copyedit when User:JamieS93 doesn't since he goes back and forth, just make things run faster!
Thanx and please respond back on my talk page!
ATC . Talk 11:31, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Article Qamishli
Assyrian (Assyria) just relegins (Christian) it’s not nation
We know as a Arab people there are no nation called Assyrian it’s false name, we know there are few hundred Christians living in Qamishli ,and they came from Greece and Turkey as asylums and Syrian government give hem full right in Syria ,and most of them they went to Europe and America, Canada .we never hearted about Assyrian in Qamishli ,maybe a few people left in Qamishli not more than 200 people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.109.84.9 (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fountain of Time/archive2
Since you participated in the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Fountain of Time, you might want to comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fountain of Time/archive2.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi I have looked at the article . It has a terrible Anti India bias. Neville Maxwell is a well known Indophobe and wrote his book in a highly biased fashion. Luckily TIME covered the events pretty well and in much more neutral fashion. you might want to look at these links if you are interested. User:Wikireader41/References#1962_war. Thanx. Wikireader41 (talk) 00:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, not surprising from Xingdong YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 00:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
- Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Sir, I have been in contact with Mattisse regarding the above arbitration. Mattisse has indicated that it may be necessary to present evidence regarding a previous matter in which you were able to identify several sock puppets who were hounding them. Mattisse indicates that they find the matter to be still at least somewhat grating to this day. I was wondering whether you would be willing to present some evidence regarding that matter should the case develop in such a way that such evidence is indicated. Thank you for your attention in this matter. John Carter (talk) 00:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)