Notion Capital
- Notion Capital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete A run-of-the-mill VC company with no indications of notability in their own right. While they may have invested in several well-known firms, notability is not inherited and this article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 14:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Several of the references meet WP:NCORP including the CRN article ([1]). the WSJ article ([2]]) and the Financial Times article ([3]), among others. The coverage might be due to the founders connection with MessageLabs, but that doesn't mean it isn't there (notability isn't anti-inherited). Also, the article seems fairly well-written, and only modestly promotional.-Mparrault (talk) 23:23, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: CRN is pretty indiscriminate, while WSJ appears to be an interview. The other sources are passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. $290M raised appears to rather small for a venture fund. Created by a SPA with no other contributions, Special:Contributions/Waynegibbins, clearly for promotional purposes. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: I don't believe size is the main point of judgement for VC funds as many are smaller in Europe than by comparison. There seem to be many many other US funds that have undisputed pages that are far smaller than this one. Misterpottery (talk) 09:49, 5 June 2018 (UTC)