Bot clerking: {{WP:PERM/Backlog|none}} (2 open requests remaining) |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* {{rfplinks|1=Mjs1991}} |
* {{rfplinks|1=Mjs1991}} |
||
:I have been reverting vandalism for quite some time now through the use of Twinkle. I also have Rollbacker and Auto-Patrolled rights to fight the vandalism that occurs through Wikipedia. I believe having the additional pending changes right will help even more. Thanks [[User:Mjs1991|Mjs1991]] ([[User talk:Mjs1991|talk]]) 08:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
:I have been reverting vandalism for quite some time now through the use of Twinkle. I also have Rollbacker and Auto-Patrolled rights to fight the vandalism that occurs through Wikipedia. I believe having the additional pending changes right will help even more. Thanks [[User:Mjs1991|Mjs1991]] ([[User talk:Mjs1991|talk]]) 08:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
====[[User:Viztor]]==== |
|||
* {{rfplinks|1=Viztor}} |
|||
:Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights |
|||
I've had this account for about nine years. I'm quite active recently and has a combined global edit count for about 8000, with no violation of behavior guideline wherever. I know what vandalism is, and I'm quite familiar with the basic content policies, and I've translated a portion of these to zh-wiki. I've argued on Wikisource and Commons for copyrights issues, although not a lawyer, I can spot copyright violation when I see one. I have read the guideline on reviewing. I only just try to review because I saw a high amount of pending review indicator, and I didn't realize I need to apply to accept revision. So I'm applying here, thanks and hope to contribute. [[User:Viztor|Viztor]] ([[User talk:Viztor|talk]]) 18:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
|||
You have an account, and routinely edit. |
|||
You have a reasonable editing history. |
|||
I am read our policy on vandalism and understand what is vandalism and what is not. |
|||
I am familiar with the basic content policies: Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. |
|||
I am familiar with the basic legal policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights. |
|||
I have read the guideline on reviewing. [[User:Viztor|Viztor]] ([[User talk:Viztor|talk]]) 18:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:23, 10 June 2019
Pending changes reviewer
User:AaqibAnjum
- AaqibAnjum (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I want to review the pages related to scholars affiliated with Deobandi movement. Aafiii 08:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- AaqibAnjum, can you explain what this permission does? Also, please contain a link to your userpage or user talk in your signature :) TonyBallioni (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Not done No reply to above question, doesn't seem to now what this is actually for. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- AaqibAnjum, can you explain what this permission does? Also, please contain a link to your userpage or user talk in your signature :) TonyBallioni (talk) 02:49, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
User:Mgasparin
- Mgasparin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I requested these rights about 4 months ago, but was denied then as I did not have enough experience or edits. Mostly, my work fixes typos or adds references where they are lacking. I know that there is frequently a large backlog of pages waiting to be reviewed for pending changes and I believe that I would be of good use in this department.Mgasparin (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC) Mgasparin (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
User:CycloneYoris
- CycloneYoris (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I created my account more than four years ago, and I've always managed to revert all of the vandals that I happen to encounter; would gladly enjoy the privilege of having pending changes reviewer rights and to keep on fighting against vandalism. CycloneYoris talk! 23:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
User:Sandy14156
- Sandy14156 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have been reverting vandalism for more than half an year, and have been a rollbacker for four months now. I would like to request for pending changes reviewer mainly because I would do more anti-vandalism work and accept good revisions that the other users edited in. Whether or not I get those rights, I would still be fine with the Rollback rights. Thanks. Sandy14156 :) 04:40, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
User:Googol30
- Googol30 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- Reviewer rights would generally assist in wikignoming and being a useful member of the encyclopedia. I've come across a multitude of pending changes I could do nothing about and have finally decided now is the time to try helping with them. Googol30 (talk) 23:41, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
User:Mjs1991
- Mjs1991 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have been reverting vandalism for quite some time now through the use of Twinkle. I also have Rollbacker and Auto-Patrolled rights to fight the vandalism that occurs through Wikipedia. I believe having the additional pending changes right will help even more. Thanks Mjs1991 (talk) 08:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
User:Viztor
- Viztor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights
I've had this account for about nine years. I'm quite active recently and has a combined global edit count for about 8000, with no violation of behavior guideline wherever. I know what vandalism is, and I'm quite familiar with the basic content policies, and I've translated a portion of these to zh-wiki. I've argued on Wikisource and Commons for copyrights issues, although not a lawyer, I can spot copyright violation when I see one. I have read the guideline on reviewing. I only just try to review because I saw a high amount of pending review indicator, and I didn't realize I need to apply to accept revision. So I'm applying here, thanks and hope to contribute. Viztor (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC) You have an account, and routinely edit.
You have a reasonable editing history.
I am read our policy on vandalism and understand what is vandalism and what is not.
I am familiar with the basic content policies: Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not.
I am familiar with the basic legal policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights.
I have read the guideline on reviewing. Viztor (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)