Editor2020 (talk | contribs) →Santa Muerte: typo |
Editor2020 (talk | contribs) →Santa Muerte: sign |
||
Line 484: | Line 484: | ||
== Santa Muerte == |
== Santa Muerte == |
||
Your edit of [[Santa Muerte]] messed it up and I have reverted it. Want to try again? |
Your edit of [[Santa Muerte]] messed it up and I have reverted it. Want to try again? [[User:Editor2020|Editor2020]] ([[User talk:Editor2020|talk]]) 02:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:01, 28 July 2018
Your GA nomination of Gospel of Jesus' Wife
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gospel of Jesus' Wife you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 21:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gospel of Jesus' Wife
The article Gospel of Jesus' Wife you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gospel of Jesus' Wife for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 01:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of A Rape on Campus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Rape on Campus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 22:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of A Rape on Campus
The article A Rape on Campus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Rape on Campus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 05:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
A FAC on Campus
Hi Magic, I saw this edit [1] after the ping failed to work. Sorry, I think you need someone with more FAC experience. Ribbet32 (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Rationale for edit?
Your edits [[2]] removed the following information without any explanation:
On November 9, 2015, Phi Kappa Psi filed a $25 million lawsuit against Rolling Stone in state court "to seek redress for the wanton destruction caused to Phi Kappa Psi by Rolling Stone's intentional, reckless, and unethical behavior."[1][2] In September 2016, the magazine sought to have the lawsuit dismissed; however, a circuit court judge ruled that the suit could proceed.[3] On June 13, 2017, the lawsuit was settled for $1.65 million.[4]
Can you explain the edits?
Thanks,
JS (talk) 23:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ Shapiro, T. Rees (November 9, 2015). "U-Va. Fraternity Files $25 Million Lawsuit Against Rolling Stone". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 3, 2016.
- ^ Complaint, Virginia Alpha Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity v. Rolling Stone LLC, No. CL15-479 (Charlottesville, Va. Circuit Court filed November 9, 2015), available at The Washington Post.
- ^ Higgins, Anna (September 6, 2016). "Lawsuits Against Rolling Stone Move Forward Despite Objection". The Cavalier Daily. Archived from the original on September 14, 2016. Retrieved September 13, 2016.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Fraternity chapter at U-Va. to settle suit against Rolling Stone for $1.65 million
Night of the Living Dead
If you feel the portions that you are removing require sourcing, mark them for citation. Don't just keep deleting the info. Udar55 (talk) 17:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 11B-X-1371
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 11B-X-1371 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Thecmonument in Baltimore
It took a bit of poking to find this out, but the monument in Baltimore is near-unique in that it does not contain a statue. So what was destroyed? The obelisk still stands. I still think it's useful, in this case, to specify that it was the inscription that was destroyed. deisenbe (talk) 19:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Dragon (Beowulf)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Dragon (Beowulf) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Magic, it looks to me as if you're rather busy, indeed in something like hot water for your GA nominations. Nothing much has happened on this article since the 20th, and while I'm not in a hurry, GANs mustn't just sit about for weeks on end. I am inclined to end the review now, unless you can assure me that there is some special reason like you have ordered some reviews from the library and they're arriving tomorrow. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'm quite busy and it's probably for the best that the review is ended. Perhaps when I'm less busy we can pick this up again? - MagicatthemovieS
- Of course. I suggest you follow through with the suggested changes until you're happy with them, and then get it peer reviewed or just nominate it again. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'm quite busy and it's probably for the best that the review is ended. Perhaps when I'm less busy we can pick this up again? - MagicatthemovieS
- Magic, it looks to me as if you're rather busy, indeed in something like hot water for your GA nominations. Nothing much has happened on this article since the 20th, and while I'm not in a hurry, GANs mustn't just sit about for weeks on end. I am inclined to end the review now, unless you can assure me that there is some special reason like you have ordered some reviews from the library and they're arriving tomorrow. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 11B-X-1371
The article 11B-X-1371 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:11B-X-1371 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA review nominations
Hi, MagicatthemovieS. I hope that you keep in mind what NinjaRobotPirate, MarnetteD and I recently stated in the case of one of your nominations. I mean, looking here, it's clear that you nominated several articles. I removed the one in question. What would you do if you had two or more reviews going on at the same time? Anyway, I ask that you be more considerate of article contributors before nominating articles for GA. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Magic, I do hope you take this message to heart. Wikipedia needs more good and featured articles, and my best guess about your nominations is that you look for articles close to the mark, do a some work on them, and nominate them. Intentions may be very good, but aside from points raised above and at the cited talk page, GAC has a lot of backlog and you're not doing any reviewing for QPQ. I don't think Gone Girl (film) is ready in its current state either, as Flyer22 Reborn seems to have alluded to. Ribbet32 (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, Ribbet, Flyer22 and everyone else if I caused you any trouble. I really was just trying to help. - MagicatthemovieS
- I know you're trying to help, there's no question about that, and that you have helped on different articles. My main question was, have you considered performing the occasional review here and there? Ribbet32 (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- I guess I should. - MagicatthemovieS
- I'm sorry, Ribbet, Flyer22 and everyone else if I caused you any trouble. I really was just trying to help. - MagicatthemovieS
- MagicatthemovieS, see what was stated on my talk page by me and BlueMoonset. You really should not be making these nominations unless you are a significant contributor to the article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- Seeing what Ribbet32 stated above about you possibly reviewing, I don't think you are ready to be a reviewer. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 14:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Why did you remove the Proslavery activists category? deisenbe (talk) 16:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC) - It's a redundant category as Brooks is part of the category "American proslavery activists."
Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Maura Murray
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappearance of Maura Murray you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Drown Soda -- Drown Soda (talk) 20:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Dragon (Beowulf)
The article The Dragon (Beowulf) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Dragon (Beowulf) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beowulf you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 07:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Don't Cry for Me Argentina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latin music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Please don't revert again, instead, per WP:BRD, make your opinions known at Talk:American History X#Editorial dispute regarding categories so an editorial consensus can be reached. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:01, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Please sign
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --John (talk) 06:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Book of Genesis
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Book of Genesis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System (talk) 15:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
madonna residence
hi,
thanks for editing the page on madonna (entertainer)
she lives in london, where her 17 year olds son is resident also, I believe
on the page it says she's resident in Portugal -she may own property there, and she was born there
I know because she is 50metres away from me now and I'm in london (she's shorter than you expect!)
but you can accept info only from secondary sources, correct? Andyraytaylor (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes. Your personal experience cannot be used as a source. Sorry :(
The article Beowulf you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Beowulf for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Maura Murray
The article Disappearance of Maura Murray you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Disappearance of Maura Murray for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Drown Soda -- Drown Soda (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your work to promote this article to GA status. It's a quite a turnaround from when there was a concerted effort to delete the article in 2009, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maura Murray (2nd nomination). I salvaged it at the time and I'm pleased to see much of my material has remained in the article. Thank you for re-including content about the online reception of the case; I'd added this before, but it was stripped out because some Wikipedians have a paradoxical dislike of such things. Fences&Windows 18:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Samson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mary Surratt
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mary Surratt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DrStrauss -- DrStrauss (talk) 18:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mary Surratt
The article Mary Surratt you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mary Surratt for things which need to be addressed. DrStrauss talk 18:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reviewer 65 -- Reviewer 65 (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento
The article Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reviewer 65 -- Reviewer 65 (talk) 12:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
The article Samson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Samson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Cabin in the Woods
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Cabin in the Woods you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 02:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XJJRosebrook -- XJJRosebrook (talk) 22:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Christianity Barnstar | |
This is for all your recent hard work at the articles Samson and Delilah, particularly the latter, which I see you have nominated for GA review. I, unfortunately, will be unable to review it for you, since I have been too closely involved in the process of bringing it to its current state, but I wish you the best of luck in advancing the quality of the article. --Katolophyromai (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Pocahontas (1995 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pocahontas (1995 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 02:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pocahontas (1995 film)
The article Pocahontas (1995 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pocahontas (1995 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Changedforbetter -- Changedforbetter (talk) 21:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Book of Genesis
The article Book of Genesis you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Book of Genesis for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System (talk) 04:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Pocahontas
Magic, I'm not sure how much clear this can be. Stop reopening the original GAC. Renominate for a second, completely new review if you must. Also, I'm not sure why you're so insistent on doing this now. You've neglected your earlier driveby nomination The Cabin in the Woods for a month, why not work on that? Or at least tell @Casliber: he might as well close it. Ribbet32 (talk) 14:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, MagicatthemovieS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hotel California
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hotel California you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 05:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Post to Be
If Post To Be is about sexuality, please put the Post to Be page in the Songs about sexuality category. 73.204.241.132 (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Death of Elisa Lam
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Death of Elisa Lam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Georgejdorner -- Georgejdorner (talk) 06:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Apple of Sodom (song), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Mediawiki-button-preview.png/760px-Mediawiki-button-preview.png)
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 11:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech
The article Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mitt Romney's 2016 anti-Trump speech for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XJJRosebrook -- XJJRosebrook (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Cabin in the Woods
The article The Cabin in the Woods you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Cabin in the Woods for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Apple of Sodom (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Apple of Sodom (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Apple of Sodom (song)
The article Apple of Sodom (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Apple of Sodom (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Hello, I'm Hakken. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Weinstein effect, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Hakken (talk) 16:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA review nominations, part 2
Regarding this nomination at the Apple of Sodom (song) article, perhaps you took what Ribbet32 and I stated in the #Your GA review nominations section above to heart? I ask because you actually worked on that article before nominating it. Not sure if I would call you a major contributor to it or not. Anyway, as long as you significantly work on an article before nominating it, there shouldn't be any issue with you making these nominations...if the other significant contributors don't object or are unlikely to object. It can be a good idea to ask on the article talk page first whether an article is ready for GA. Give people at least two days to reply. If no one answers after that, then you should feel free to press ahead with the nomination. To repeat: You should be a significant contributor to the article you are nominating and you should have the time to work on the article per the GA reviewer's concerns. As a number of failed GA nominations posted above on your talk page show, you either often do not have the time or you do not put much effort in. Don't be concerned with trying to rack up a whole bunch of GA articles, if that is a part of your drive. If you've had little to do with the improvement of an article, but nominate it for GA, it's like you are riding off the hard work of others. Personally, I think it's more satisfying when one is a part of that hard work. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 14:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- I did take Ribbet32's advice to heart. I actually was a major contributer to the "Apple of Sodom" article (look at the history of the page, I'd venture to say I did at least 75% of the edits). As of late, I have been massively changing sub-par articles and then nominating them for GA status, which I did for the Delilah article. I agree with your views on hard work. Thanks for the guidance on how to become a better Wikipedian, and for the follow-up.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 14:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for listening to the concerns of fellow editors and changing your approach. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hotel California
The article Hotel California you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hotel California for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)
The article I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 02:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Why?
When you made this edit you didn't explain why. Seems to me it was useful informaion which led into the following information. I have restored it. Moriori (talk) 21:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Moriori: It was from a source that said none of those thing.
- What? There were four sources, not the best, but adequate. That information introduced the sentence that followed which needed explaining of how/why this lady in British Columbia was suddenly at San Diego Zoo. I think it is highly pertinent information, but am happy to let GA1 reviewer @Georgejdorner: decide. Moriori (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- I have left a request for further explanation at Moriori's Talk page.Georgejdorner (talk) 22:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- What? There were four sources, not the best, but adequate. That information introduced the sentence that followed which needed explaining of how/why this lady in British Columbia was suddenly at San Diego Zoo. I think it is highly pertinent information, but am happy to let GA1 reviewer @Georgejdorner: decide. Moriori (talk) 21:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Death of Elisa Lam
The article Death of Elisa Lam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Death of Elisa Lam for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Georgejdorner -- Georgejdorner (talk) 18:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
A New Year's honor ...
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For your work bringing Death of Elisa Lam to GA status when I was mostly otherwise occupied. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Marilyn Manson (band)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marilyn Manson (band) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Images at Satan
Thank you for all the terrific and helpful images you have added to the article Satan. I just thought I would note that you might not want to add any more; we probably do not have space and I think we have enough already. If you find more useful images, we may want to consider replacing ones that are already in the article instead because we do not want to overwhelm the reader with too many pictures. I think that, right now, the numbers of images we have is probably just perfect. --Katolophyromai (talk) 03:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Katolophyromai: I felt the same way when I added the image of the shofar. Great minds think alike! However, if you want to remove any images I added, feel free to do so.
Category:Statues of Presidents of the United States
Thanks for finding a few more entries to populate this category. I'll try to keep this one in mind as I continue creating new articles about statues in the National Statuary Hall Collection. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Since all statues are sculptures, but not all sculptures are statues, I went ahead and created the parent Category:Sculptures of Presidents of the United States. I also created the subcategory Category:Busts of Presidents of the United States. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Marilyn Manson (band)
The article Marilyn Manson (band) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marilyn Manson (band) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Get Your Gunn
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Get Your Gunn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Get Your Gunn
The article Get Your Gunn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Get Your Gunn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lunchbox (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lunchbox (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lunchbox (song)
The article Lunchbox (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lunchbox (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Since you helped me so much while I was writing them, I thought I would let you know that the articles Jonah and Satan are now both under GA review. --Katolophyromai (talk) 20:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Booty (song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Booty (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 04:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Booty (song)
The article Booty (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Booty (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 06:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Long Hard Road Out of Hell
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Long Hard Road Out of Hell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Long Hard Road Out of Hell
The article Long Hard Road Out of Hell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Long Hard Road Out of Hell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Homeostasis07 -- Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Look at Your Game, Girl
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Look at Your Game, Girl you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of [[User:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}]] -- [[User:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|talk]]) 15:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Look at Your Game, Girl
The article Look at Your Game, Girl you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Look at Your Game, Girl for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of [[User:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}]] -- [[User:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}]] ([[User talk:{{subst:TheGracefulSlick}}|talk]]) 14:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Pocahontas
Hello, MagicatthemovieS. I see you have nominated the film for GA. If its alright, would you like me to review it? — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 07:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Ssven2: I'd be thankful if you did! -- MagicatthemovieS
- Left some comments at the GAR.
— Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:05, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- Left some more comments at the GAR in case you did not receive my ping.
— Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
- Left some more comments at the GAR regarding the source review.
— Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- Left some more comments at the GAR regarding the source review.
- Left some more comments at the GAR in case you did not receive my ping.
- Left some comments at the GAR.
Your GA nomination of Booty (song)
The article Booty (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Booty (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 23:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento
The article Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gerald Ford assassination attempt in Sacramento for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 05:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pocahontas (1995 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Schwartz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pocahontas (1995 film)
The article Pocahontas (1995 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pocahontas (1995 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
in the enhanced toolbar, or
if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 16:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Delilah you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Birth of a Nation
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Birth of a Nation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Delilah you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Delilah for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 15:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Edit to Escape from Tomorrow
"Song"?
You're working too hard . Daniel Case (talk) 00:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Birth of a Nation
The article The Birth of a Nation you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Birth of a Nation for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Annihilation film and "The Colour out of Space"
Hi MagicatthemovieS, I'm a Wikipedia novice so apologies if I am doing this wrong. First off, thanks for your edits to the Annihilation (film) page. It looks great! One of the edits concerns me a bit though: the addition of the link to H.P. Lovecraft's "The Colour out of Space." It's not entirely clear what the connection is since it's only a link and I'm worried that readers might misconstrue it to mean that the film or book was influenced by Lovecraft's story. To quote VanderMeer[1]: "I know that personally it is frustrating to find readers making a connection between my work and Lovecraft’s when he not only wasn’t an influence, but was a writer who bored me silly when I first encountered him." I know that the film and "Colour" share some similarities though. Maybe there's a way to clarify that? Thanks.
d5dq (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- @David T Davis: I changed the article so the body of it mentions "Colour" :)--MagicatthemovieS
Perfect! Thank you.--David — Preceding unsigned comment added by David T Davis (talk • contribs) 00:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ VanderMeer, Jeff. http://weirdfictionreview.com/2012/09/moving-past-lovecraft/.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help)
Your GA nomination of Lest We Forget: The Best Of
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lest We Forget: The Best Of you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lest We Forget: The Best Of
The article Lest We Forget: The Best Of you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lest We Forget: The Best Of for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 11:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Delilah response
You did add the media appearances for Delilah. Might I suggest you add in any info from those pages that might be different from the bible even when the latest Samson movie comes out. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Rtkat3: The article already passed for GA. With all due respect, if you would like the article further changed, I would suggest you do it yourself.--MagicatthemovieS
I've opened an RfC on the question of whether this article should be included in Category:Obscenity controversies in music. You'll find it here. In the meantime, the article stays in the status quo ante, i,e, not in the category, until there is a consensus. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
What the heck are you doing?
I've reverted several changes to categorization on school articles just now. Schools are not monuments or memorials. They are also not songs. Please self revert the rest of your changes to categorization on school articles and seek a consensus for your changes at a central location like WT:WPSCH. Thanks John from Idegon (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Also, you should seriously consider archiving your talk page. The majority of Wikipedia users access the site on mobile devices and your talk page is getting to the size where it will crash mobile browsers. John from Idegon (talk) 00:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: According to the article List of Confederate monuments and memorials, schools named after Confederates count as monuments and memorials.--MagicatthemovieS
- That has absolutely nothing to do with this. John from Idegon (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: Wikipedians have already determined that a school named after Robert E. Lee counts as a Confederate memorial. By the way, I deleted old, unimportant aspects of my talk page so that it would be easier to load.--MagicatthemovieS
- No, a few (more likely "a") Wikipedians determined that schools should be listed on a single list article. That is in no way a consensus to add them to a category. I see I'm not the only editor that has taken issue with your categorization work. In order to be added into a category, an article has to have information in it on the topic of the category. An article on a school has no information on the Confederate States of America (and if it did, it should be removed as off topic) and an article on a lake has no information in it on Stonewall Jackson. John from Idegon (talk) 01:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: Wikipedians have already determined that a school named after Robert E. Lee counts as a Confederate memorial. By the way, I deleted old, unimportant aspects of my talk page so that it would be easier to load.--MagicatthemovieS
- That has absolutely nothing to do with this. John from Idegon (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: According to the article List of Confederate monuments and memorials, schools named after Confederates count as monuments and memorials.--MagicatthemovieS
Monument and memorial controversies
The article is about Controversies - those precede actions. It’s not just about actions that have happened. It’s about proposed actions as well as past controversial actions. (I created the article, for what that's worth.) I am restoring the section you removed. deisenbe (talk) 11:20, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Jaws (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. I see based on your Talk page that other editors have taken issue with your categorizations, so I'm asking you to please be more careful. Jaws is not classified as a monster movie anywhere in the article, nor is it listed at List of monster movies. DonIago (talk) 16:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Confederate Soldier Memorial (Columbus, Ohio)
You added a category to Confederate Soldier Memorial (Columbus, Ohio) that said that it was demolished in 2017. As far as I know, only the statue was vandalized - the rest of the memorial was still there as of November 20, 2017. Do you have later information? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 22:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Bubba73: I don't. Woops.--MagicatthemovieS
- then I think that the category you added today is not correct. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 22:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for correcting. ----Another Believer (Talk) 22:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 22:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- then I think that the category you added today is not correct. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 22:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Da Vinci Code (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You boldly added a category. It was reverted. Now it's time for discussion. SummerPhDv2.0 01:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nayirah testimony
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nayirah testimony you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 18:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Your category additions
Seriously what the actual fuck? Can you use logic sometimes and read the article? —IB [ Poke ] 04:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tawana Brawley rape allegations
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tawana Brawley rape allegations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 11:00, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mary Surratt
The article Mary Surratt you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mary Surratt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nayirah testimony
The article Nayirah testimony you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nayirah testimony for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Tawana Brawley rape allegations
The article Tawana Brawley rape allegations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tawana Brawley rape allegations for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nayirah testimony
The article Nayirah testimony you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nayirah testimony for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Night of the Living Dead
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Night of the Living Dead you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 23:20, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pulp fiction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Night of the Living Dead
The article Night of the Living Dead you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Night of the Living Dead for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Tennessee
I’ve rolled back what you did on Removal of Confederate monuments. Everyone involved would agree that they’re being removed. They may be moved somewhere else, but it will be somewhere much less conspicuous and public. Now they’re sitting in warehouses. Remember the parks themselves were renamed. deisenbe (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Night of the Living Dead
The article Night of the Living Dead you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Night of the Living Dead for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Red Phoenix -- Red Phoenix (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for the help with the I Need You (Paris Hilton song) article! Aoba47 (talk) 21:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Stonewall Jackson monument
you added - what is the evidence? Isn’t it in Monticello, county seat and only significant town? deisenbe (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)•
Your GA nomination of Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song)
The article Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rock Is Dead (Marilyn Manson song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Born Villain (film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Born Villain (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 00:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Born Villain (film)
The article Born Villain (film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Born Villain (film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 21:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
The Birth of a Nation poster
Please go here to discuss the poster for The Birth of a Nation. 24.18.128.102 (talk) 19:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Signing your posts
Please use four tildes (~~~~
) to sign your posts. As designated in Wikipedia:Signatures, your signature must include at least one link to your user page, user talk page (here), or contributions page, and the date and time at which the comment was made. Nardog (talk) 22:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
If you're too lazy to add tildes every time you comment, what you can do alternatively is add {{YesAutosign}} to your user page and let SineBot take care of your signatures. Nardog (talk) 22:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Santa Muerte
Your edit of Santa Muerte messed it up and I have reverted it. Want to try again? Editor2020 (talk) 02:01, 28 July 2018 (UTC)