The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the last Norse–Gaelic King of Dublin, Ascall mac Ragnaill, was captured and executed in 1171 after failing to reclaim his kingdom from the English?
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 21, 2016, September 21, 2017, September 21, 2020, September 21, 2022, and September 21, 2023.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the NorthGermanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
I'm puzzled by the following opposite characterisations of the Irish Annals as "objective" and contrasted with the "unreliable writings of Giraldus Cambrensis". In what sense and who made the judgement that the former is objective? Why is the latter dismissed as unreliable?
Fair point. The annalistic records are much more likely to be correct than Geralds flowery account IMO, but as long as we haven't got secondary scholarly sources backing this those words are better left out. Finn Rindahl (talk) 07:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Transcription of MS image
I'm uncertain about the transcription of Ascall's name given below the manuscript image: the name is given as "Hasculphus", but from what I can see the image actually shows "Haschulfus"—I'm not a mediaeval palaeographer, so I may be missing a reason why it's transcribed that way? Gabrielbodard (talk) 07:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]