There’s a 500/30 restriction in place this topic, but I was just wondering how did you know about this brand new article since it was JUST created like barely hours ago by User:François Robere? Volunteer Marek 18:16, 15 August 2021 (UTC) François who? It's front page news.
Sigh, you know you can’t edit these articles/topic [1]. Volunteer Marek 18:23, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
You link to something about 1933–45, this is anti-Semitic law from 2021.
- Stop playing games. Volunteer Marek 18:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
What games? This is a 2021 law against Jews in Poland, your link has nothing to do with it.
- It' related to the Holocaust. Stop playing games. Volunteer Marek 18:53, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Israel–Poland relations. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GizzyCatBella🍁 18:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Why are you warring? Why are you removing law restricting return of stolen Jewish property? Israel recalled its ambassador today and sent the Polish ambassador packing, how is this not relevant to the relations article?
- Please read -Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism_in_Poland#Antisemitism_in_Poland:_Motion_(May_2020). You can make a request on the article' talk page. Thank you. - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
You keep linking to that link, but that link is about about ancient history from 1933-45. This is a 2021 law against Jews, not 1945.
Indefinite block
![Stop icon](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 20:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
I added info backed by sources
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Ludwig97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
WTF is a "suspect dormant account"? I don't edit Wikipedia, but reading the news I thought it was a worthy edition because it is everywhere:
https://www.politico.eu/article/israel-diplomat-poland-anti-semitic-unethical-restitution-law/ Israel recalls top diplomat from Poland citing ‘anti-Semitic’ restitution law
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58218750 Polish law on property stolen by Nazis angers Israel
https://euobserver.com/world/152641 Poland offends US and Israel with media and Holocaust laws
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/poland-a-step-closer-to-adopting-controversial-property-law/ Poland a step closer to adopting controversial property law
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/01/anger-as-poland-plans-law-that-will-stop-jews-reclaiming-wartime-homes Anger as Poland plans law that will stop Jews reclaiming wartime homes
https://apnews.com/article/europe-middle-east-business-israel-poland-07698b2559f1c236b97a2319d520e8cc Media, Holocaust bills test Poland’s ties with US, Israel
https://www.dw.com/en/poland-lawmakers-approve-holocaust-restitution-bill/a-58835704 Poland: Lawmakers approve Holocaust restitution bill
Everything I added had a source. All of a sudden a couple of editors were jumping all over me and now I am blocked? WTF? Isn't this the encyclopedia anyone can edit? Ludwig97 (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
"The encyclopedia anyone can edit" does not mean "the encyclopedia anyone can edit under any circumstances without restriction". You don't really address the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 07:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Ludwig97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The stated reason for the block was [2] "suspect dormant account". I was blocked for mere suspicion? I don't edit Wikipedia much, but my motivation to edit this topic arose from a spate of journalism I saw and read on the subject and a corresponding lack of material on Wikipedia. It was entirely natural for me, or any user, to have interest in this issue that was in the news. I do not have additional accounts. I have edited only with this account and occasional very small edits without logging in like [3] that one in July.Ludwig97 (talk) 09:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline; no admin has seen fit to unblock based on this request for more than a month. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @ Ludwig97 - How did you immediately mention "Polish users posting messages" [4] if you only edited two other unrelated articles as an IP? Excuse me, but do I have the word "Poland" stamped anywhere? - GizzyCatBella🍁 10:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)