This article is part of a series on the |
![]() |
---|
![]() |
Ten national referendums were held in Switzerland in 2018. Voting took place on 4 March, 10 June, 23 September and 25 November.
March referendums
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/40/No-Billag-Initiative_2018.svg/220px-No-Billag-Initiative_2018.svg.png)
Two referendums were held on 4 March. One was on a Federal Decree on the new Financial Regulation 2021, which would extend the right of the federal government to levy VAT and direct federal tax until 2035.[1] The other was the "Yes to the abolition of radio and television fees" popular initiative, which proposed abolishing the licence fee that provides the majority of funding for the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation.[1]
The abolition proposal, known by the informal name No Billag, was rejected by the Federal Assembly in 2017.[2] Proponents of the initiative argued it was not fair for everyone to pay the fee regardless of whether they consumed Swiss Broadcasting Corporation output or not, that the total yearly sum of 1.37 billion francs should be spent by consumers, and that the SRG SSR would become more politically independent if it did not depend on the mandatory fee.[3][4] Opponents of the initiative claimed that removing the mandatory fee would threaten national cohesion and that the country would become a "media desert" which would be dangerous to Switzerland's system of direct democracy.[3] A committee, "Nein zum Sendeschluss", was formed to oppose the initiative.[3] Opponents received support from 6,000 artists who published an online statement "defending cultural diversity in Switzerland" and argued that cultural diversity would be threatened if the initiative passed.[5] Polls suggested 65 percent would vote against the proposal.[6]
The Federal Decree on the new Financial Regulation 2021 was approved by 84% of votes, while the No Billag initiative was rejected by 72% of voters.
Results
Question | For | Against | Invalid/ blank |
Total votes |
Registered voters |
Turnout | Cantons for | Cantons against | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Full | Half | Full | Half | ||||||
Financial Regulation 2021 | 2,358,086 | 84.1 | 445,464 | 15.9 | 100,497 | 2,904,047 | 5,391,090 | 53.87 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Approved |
Abolition of Radio and Television Fees | 833,837 | 28.4 | 2,098,302 | 71.6 | 24,215 | 2,956,354 | 54.84 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 6 | Rejected | |
Source: Federal Chancellery of Switzerland 1, 2 |
June referendums
Two referendums were held on 10 June; one on the Sovereign Money Initiative proposal and one on the Federal Gambling Act.[7]
The Sovereign Money Initiative proposal aims to give the Swiss National Bank a monopoly on money creation.[8] It was launched by the Monetary Modernisation Association, without the support of any political party.[9] The collection of signatures began on 3 June 2014,[8] and the initiative was submitted to the Federal Chancellery on 1 December 2015 with over 110,000 valid signatures, despite its technical subject and without the support of political parties or other civil society organizations.[9] The Federal Assembly recommended rejecting the initiative.
Results
Question | For | Against | Invalid/ blank |
Total votes |
Registered voters |
Turnout % | Cantons for | Cantons against | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Full | Half | Full | Half | ||||||
Sovereign Money Initiative | 442,387 | 24.3 | 1,379,540 | 75.7 | 44,042 | 1,865,969 | 5,400,197 | 34.6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 6 | Rejected |
Federal Gambling Act | 1,326,207 | 72.9 | 492,024 | 27.1 | 45,723 | 1,863,954 | 34.5 | Approved | |||||
Source: Federal Chancellery of Switzerland 1, 2 |
September referendums
Three referendums were held on 23 September. The first was aimed at requiring the federal government to consider cycle paths in the same way as footpaths and hiking trails,[10] the second would require the government to promote environmentally sound, animal-friendly and fairly produced foodstuffs,[11] and the third to focus agriculture policy on small, family farms and to promote sustainable, diverse and gene-technology-free agriculture.[12] The cycle paths initiative was approved, whilst the food and agriculture ones were rejected.
Results
Question | For | Against | Invalid/ blank |
Total votes |
Registered voters |
Turnout % | Cantons for | Cantons against | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Full | Half | Full | Half | ||||||
Cycle Initiative | 1,475,000 | 73.6 | 529,253 | 26.4 | 24,603 | 2,028,856 | 5,412,449 | 37.5 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Approved |
Fair Food Initiative | 774,821 | 38.7 | 1,227,326 | 61.3 | 28,699 | 2,030,846 | 37.5 | 4 | 0 | 16 | 6 | Rejected | |
Agricultural Policy | 628,301 | 31.6 | 1,358,894 | 68.4 | 40,803 | 2,027,998 | 37.5 | 4 | 0 | 16 | 6 | Rejected | |
Source: Federal Chancellery of Switzerland 1, 2, 3 |
November referendums
Three referendums were held on 25 November. The first proposal aimed to subsidise farmers who did not dehorn their livestock.[13][14][15] The second proposal would have explicitly given the Swiss Federal Constitution precedence over international law whenever the two contradict.[16][17] The third initiative would allow insurance companies to hire their own detectives to spy on individuals suspected of abusing social welfare privileges.[18][19][20]
Results
Question | For | Against | Invalid/ blank |
Total votes |
Registered voters |
Turnout % | Cantons for | Cantons against | Result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | Full | Half | Full | Half | ||||||
Subsidising farmers not dehorning their livestock | 1,144,845 | 45.3 | 1,384,027 | 54.7 | 89,375 | 2,618,247 | 5,420,789 | 48.3 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 4 | Rejected |
Giving the Swiss constitution precedence over international law | 872,288 | 33.7 | 1,713,501 | 66.3 | 38,347 | 2,624,136 | 48.4 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 6 | Rejected | |
Allowing insurance companies to use private detectives | 1,667,849 | 64.7 | 909,172 | 35.3 | 45,370 | 2,622,391 | 48.4 | Approved | |||||
Source: Federal Chancellery of Switzerland 1, 2, 3 |
References
- ^ a b Referendum of 4 March 2018 Federal Council
- ^ Parliament rejects ‘No Billag’ licence fee initiative SWI, 26 September 2017
- ^ a b c George Mills. "'Scrapping compulsory TV licence fees would be dangerous for Switzerland's direct democracy'", The Local, 27 February 2018.
- ^ The Local. "Swiss referendum results: everything you need to know", The Local, 5 March 2018.
- ^ The Local. "Artists fight to keep public broadcasting licence fee", The Local, 8 January 2018.
- ^ The Local. "Referendum: Swiss set to stand behind embattled public broadcaster", The Local, 21 February 2018
- ^ Objets de la votation populaire du 10 juin 2018 [Objects of the popular vote of 10 June 2018] Federal Chancellery of Switzerland
- ^ a b Initiative populaire fédérale « Pour une monnaie à l'abri des crises : émission monétaire uniquement par la Banque nationale ! (Initiative Monnaie pleine) » Federal Chancellery of Switzerland
- ^ a b (in French) « Monnaie pleine : une opportunité unique en Suisse pour changer la monnaie », La Revue durable, number 60 titled « Des monnaies pour une prospérité sans croissance », winter-spring 2017-2018, pages 26–29.
- ^ "Direct counter-proposal to the Bike Initiative". admin.ch. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
- ^ "Fair Food Initiative". admin.ch. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
- ^ "Federal Popular Initiative For food sovereignty". admin.ch. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
- ^ "Horned Cow Initiative". Admin.ch. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- ^ Vuilleumier, Marie (26 October 2018). "Are cows happier with their horns?". Swissinfo. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- ^ Nebehay, Stephanie (November 20, 2018). "Cows with or without horns? Swiss to vote on Sunday". Reuters. Retrieved November 20, 2018.
- ^ "Self-determination Initiative". Admin.ch. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- ^ Bondolfi, Sibilla (25 October 2018). "'Swiss law first' initiative: what's at stake?". Swissinfo. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- ^ "Statutory basis for monitoring claimants". Admin.ch. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- ^ Tognina, Andrea (27 October 2018). "Big Brother on the doorstep?". Swissinfo. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- ^ "Swiss voters to decide on fate of 'social detectives'". Swissinfo. 5 July 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2018.