Selfstudier (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
:::That's a different problem (that has been addressed at least twice bfore that I know of, perhaps more, lol). Your edit has been reverted so since it is an IsPal page, you are required to obtain consensus for that on the relevant talk page (there are three different articles that have it, I think, all related to each other). At this point, just saying that the image is low res and therefore useless is not going to win the day, I'm afraid.[[User:Selfstudier|Selfstudier]] ([[User talk:Selfstudier#top|talk]]) 13:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC) |
:::That's a different problem (that has been addressed at least twice bfore that I know of, perhaps more, lol). Your edit has been reverted so since it is an IsPal page, you are required to obtain consensus for that on the relevant talk page (there are three different articles that have it, I think, all related to each other). At this point, just saying that the image is low res and therefore useless is not going to win the day, I'm afraid.[[User:Selfstudier|Selfstudier]] ([[User talk:Selfstudier#top|talk]]) 13:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Copying licensed material requires proper attribution == |
|||
Hi. I see in a recent addition to [[Sykes–Picot Agreement]] you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Government Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 17:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:17, 1 July 2017
I want to start with spacetime J = spacetime derivative F and expand to
Then decompose into dot and cross and equate parts to give the usual Maxwell equations. Selfstudier (talk) 11:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Decomposition
whence equating parts (timelike vectors e0, spacelike vectors ek, timelike trivectors I4e0 and spacelike trivectors I4ek) results in
The 3D decomposition can be done similarly but much more simply using just e1e2e3Selfstudier (talk) 14:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
If we start from we can expand to
Then equate scalar,vector,bivector and i trivector terms for the usual equations.
- Aside*
Coordinate frame reciprocal frame and define vector derivative
Maxwell tensor
Spacetime equivalents are but we can combine with geometric product Selfstudier (talk) 13:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
CGA Table
is the Minkowski plane.
Hyperb
You can do a 2/3D version with projection to eg Poincare disc
Function "Process"
Interesting correspondence with [Definition_Fonction]. Note some differences with English terminology. Boute (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Conformal Embedding.jpg
Hi, thanks for adding this image. It was requested that an SVG file be created, so if it's ok I did so. Is it ok to use in place of the JPG? Thanks again. Maschen (talk) 23:06, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
LinePlaneIntersect.png
Similarly for this image? (Although no explicit requests, SVG is generally preferable...) Thanks again, Maschen (talk) 21:31, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
File:LinePlaneIntersect.png missing description details
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Geometric calculus
I made some rather major updates to geometric calculus based mostly on the reference you mentioned in its talk page. You may wish to have a look and correct/improve further. Teply (talk) 23:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ME IsPal
Will keep notes here re this, situation has changed quite a bit in recent years but due to compete editing and other such nonsense its virtually impossible to get a page changed except other than superficially. Result is many errors and out of date and not up to date things in the relevant pages.
Example: see perfectly simple and straightforward name change put forward by self at Palestinian territories (to Occupied Palestine territory, which is what it is called by all of the high level people including the SecGen and Sec Council) Of couse, certain interests don't like plausible conclusions that might follow from this and so put up bureaucratic resistance that I can't be bothered to deal with.
Major errors have crept in because of a failure to address consequences of recognition of State of Palestine and of UNSC 2334
UNGA 20 Jan 2016 SecGen report A/HRC/31/43 Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the Occupied Syrian Golan again, the use of Territory not territories, also in many other similar high level documents but because the WP bureaucrats say that there are thousands of low level documents using territories then those count ahead, lol.
Above doc : Legal background 4. An analysis of the applicable legal framework and the basis for the obligations of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and occupied Syrian Golan can be found in previous reports of the Secretary-General (see A/69/348, paras. 4-5, and A/HRC/25/38, paras. 4-5).
and if you follow the trail again you find Territory not territories.
So it is perfectly clear what the legal intent is regardless of any customary or administrative usage might be.
Other accounts
Did you have/had any other accounts on Wikipedia?--Shrike (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- First of all thank you for your answer .I didn't see that you already answered this anyhow in the I/P are many users were topic banned and used WP:SOCKs to edit circumventing their ban.Shrike (talk) 13:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Minor edits
Hi Please read WP:MINOR and act accordingly thanks. Shrike (talk) 11:58, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
ARBPIA noice
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please read the above carefully and modify your behavior accordingly. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 20:19, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi Selfstudier: Some unsolicited advice. As the length of a talk page discussion increases, the probability of bad-faith accusations and incivility reaches one. If you find yourself at an impasse, stop trying to convince the other person of your position, and seek WP:DR. It's better for all involved.
Unfortunately, while I planned to participate in the talk page discussion, but I haven't been able to in the past couple of weeks. I still hope to do so soon. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 02:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Selfstudier,
according to the guc tool I have 1501 edits in English Wikipedia. I don't want mess up with you, but I would like to know whether this low quality map should be included?
IMHO it is not adding any value to the article and may disappoint the reader due to poor distinguishability. The content is well understandable without this illustration.
Best regards, --Kopiersperre (talk) 12:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I went by your history page, guess that gave me wrong info :) I have voted keep this image at Wikimedia Commons, will try to get a better one. As I stated at Wikimedia, it is in some respects more important to know that the image exists and that the FO prepared it than to be able to see all the details (in fact all you really need to know is that Palestine was included within the outline area). There was a link to a source with a high res image that you also deleted when you made your edit, tho that's only good if you happen to possess the source Selfstudier (talk) 13:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- Please let's continue the discussion where it started. I would be very glad, if we will get a high quality version in the end. But before we've achied this goal I'm against an inclusion of the map in the article.--Kopiersperre (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- That's a different problem (that has been addressed at least twice bfore that I know of, perhaps more, lol). Your edit has been reverted so since it is an IsPal page, you are required to obtain consensus for that on the relevant talk page (there are three different articles that have it, I think, all related to each other). At this point, just saying that the image is low res and therefore useless is not going to win the day, I'm afraid.Selfstudier (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Copying licensed material requires proper attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Sykes–Picot Agreement you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Government Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)