No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
:* [[Natural News]], quote from article: "{{tq|is an anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and '''fake news''' website known for promoting pseudoscience and far-right extremism.}}" |
:* [[Natural News]], quote from article: "{{tq|is an anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and '''fake news''' website known for promoting pseudoscience and far-right extremism.}}" |
||
:(all my bolding). Sources that have intentionally misleading stories, falsehoods and fake news are not sources that we use in Wikipedia, and therefore they are either strongly deprecated, or outright blacklisted (where material that is deemed suitable by community consensus can be included through whitelisting). --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 10:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
:(all my bolding). Sources that have intentionally misleading stories, falsehoods and fake news are not sources that we use in Wikipedia, and therefore they are either strongly deprecated, or outright blacklisted (where material that is deemed suitable by community consensus can be included through whitelisting). --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 10:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
CNN has also published conspiracy theories and discussed them on air openly. Don’t you pay attention to that corporation? The right wing news sources losted above are just as far to the right as CNN is to the left. You all need to tale a long hard look in the mirror to see what you are doing to information communication. For the past four years, people of your political understandong have cried that POTUS is a fascist, yet here is fascism in practice. [[User:Haerdt|Haerdt]] ([[User talk:Haerdt|talk]]) 12:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:05, 31 December 2020
Spam blacklists |
---|
|
The Spam-whitelist page is used in conjunction with the Mediawiki SpamBlacklist extension, and lists strings of text that override Meta's blacklist and the local spam-blacklist. Any administrator can edit the spam whitelist. Please post comments to the appropriate section below: Proposed additions (web pages to unblock), Proposed removals (sites to reblock), or Troubleshooting and problems; read the messageboxes at the top of each section for an explanation. See also MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist.
Please enter your requests at the bottom of the Proposed additions to Whitelist section and not at the very bottom of the page. Sign your requests with four tildes: ~~~~
Also in your request, please include the following:
- The link that you want whitelisted in the section title, like === example.com/help/index.php === .
- The Wikipedia page on which you want to use the link
- An explanation why it would be useful to the encyclopedia article proper
- If the site you're requesting is listed at /Common requests, please include confirmation that you have read the reason why requests regarding the site are commonly denied and that you still desire to proceed with your request
Important: You must provide a full link to the specific web page you want to be whitelisted (leave out the http://
from the front; otherwise you will not be able to save your edit to this page). Requests quoting only a domain (i.e. ending in .com
or similar with nothing after the /
character) are likely to be denied. If you wish to have a site fully unblocked please visit the relevant section of MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist.
Note: Do not request links to be whitelisted where you can reasonably suspect that the material you want to link to is in violation of copyright (see WP:LINKVIO). Such requests will likely be summarily rejected.
There is no automated notification system in place for the results of requests, and you will not be notified when your request has a response. You should therefore add this page to your personal watch list, to your notifications through the subscribe feature, or check back here every few days to see if there is any progress on it; in particular, you should check whether administrators have raised any additional queries or expressed any concerns about the request, as failure to reply to these promptly will generally result in the request being denied.
Completed requests are archived, additions and removal are logged. →snippet for logging: {{/request|997419737#section_name}}
Note that requests from new or unregistered users are not usually considered.
Admins: Use seth's tool to search the spamlists.
Indicators | |
---|---|
Request completed: | |
![]() |
{{Done}} |
![]() |
{{StaleIP}} |
![]() |
{{withdrawn}} |
Request declined: | |
![]() |
{{Declined}} |
![]() |
{{Notdone}} |
Information: | |
![]() |
{{MoreInfo}} |
![]() |
{{TakeNote}} |
Notice to everyone about our Reliable sources and External links noticeboards
If you have a source that you would like to add to the spam-whitelist, but you are uncertain that it meets Wikipedia's guideline on reliability, please ask for opinions on the Reliable sources noticeboard, to confirm that it does meet that guideline, before submitting your whitelisting request here. In your request, link to the confirming discussion on that noticeboard.
Likewise, if you have an external link that you are uncertain meets Wikipedia's guideline on external links, please get confirmation on the External links noticeboard before submitting your whitelisting request here.
If your whitelist request falls under one of these two categories, the admins will be more willing to have the source whitelisted if you can achieve consensus at one of the above noticeboards.
Proposed additions to Whitelist (web pages to unblock)
casino.ru/istoriya-gemblinga-na-ukraine/
- casino.ru: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambling_in_Ukraine Gambling in Ukraine – the article in English (mentioned above) is poor and need a lot of work and references from native speaker’s sites will be good. In fact there is nothing about new gambling law in wiki article in English. I’m working on that part of article about 2020 law in Ukraine, collected a lot of materials and want to use this website to improve the quality of article and to share with English speakers important things about new law. I found this site useful. There are unique interviews, articles. Will appreciate your opinion. Waiting for reply to continue work on that article. --SmurFF2020 (talk) 15:18, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
xyz.law
- xyz.law: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Specifically requesting the xyz.law homepage be unblocked for use. Link requested to be whitelisted: xyz.law
. Dadum01
- @Dadum01:
On hold, first please see if the page gets accepted, it is currently still a draft as Draft:XYZ Law. For now it looks very thin and minimal and I doubt that it will pass the review. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
kivodaily.com
- kivodaily: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Specifically requesting the kivodaily.com homepage be unblocked for use.Link requested to be whitelisted: kivodaily
.user:JoshKaine
Link requested to be whitelisted: https://www.kivodaily.com/entertainment/ff-rarri-is-on-the-rise/
A news article was posted under the artist name and, i wanted to add it too his wikipedia references. The website is a news site and should be whitelisted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshKaine (talk • contribs)
Declined. This is, at best, a churnalism sinkhole run by paid placement content marketers. The article in question was written recently by a "SEO content manager" who shows up on a lot of falsified news sites. This is not a WP:RS in any way. Kuru (talk) 12:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
wildmatsu.xyz
- wildmatsu.xyz: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- Link requested to be whitelisted:
https://wildmatsu.xyz/ripguide/
I would like to link to this site in the external links section of the SiIvaGunner article, since it is an in-depth primary source authored by a member of the article's subject; it is affected by the .xyz part of the URL. I have already linked to https://highquality.rip/ripguide/ as a substitute, since the contents are mostly the same, but that version of the site suffers from formatting issues (e.g. visible XML tags, broken embeds, center-aligned bullet points) since it was not copied correctly from wildmatsu.xyz. Overcast07 (talk) 10:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Breitbart.com
- breitbart.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- Link requested to be whitelisted:
www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/08/23/exclusive-richard-grenell-trump-doesnt-play-identity-politics
Specifically requesting one article for use in Wikipedia page "Richard Grenell". Topic is Grenell's thinking about how gay friendly the Trump administration was. Grenell expressed his opinion to Breitbart News more in depth than found in the section already on the Wikipedia page. Wikipedia blacklist policy allows Breitbart references to be used for opinion, which this is. As Grenell made the statement directly to Breitbart, Breitbart is the primary authoritative source.Psubjj (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
mcafee good domains
- mcafee.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- thepatmcafeefoundation.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- mcafeeinstitute.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- mcafeesecure.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- mcafeesecurity.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
These need to be whitelisted to allow for this to be executed. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Beetstra:
Added to MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
D-addicts.com
- d-addicts.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- Link requested to be whitelisted:
wiki.d-addicts.com/Pink_no_Idenshi
I need this page unblocked in order to submit a possible copyright violation over Pink no Idenshi via Template:copyvio. lullabying (talk) 19:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Lullabying:
Declined. You can list the URL without the protocol, just like it is above. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- 4shared.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- Link requested to be whitelisted:
www.4shared.com/aboutus.jsp
This is to include a link to the website in 4shared (currently a draft because the page is create-protected, but the website is more notable than when it was previously deleted). Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 00:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Elliot321, this will be executed when draft:4shared is moved to mainspace. Dirk Beetstra T C 06:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Beetstra: mainspaced now. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 07:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Elliot321:
Added to MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 21:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
gmac4247 whitelist request
- gmac4247.000webhostapp.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- 995510410#gmac4247.000webhostapp.com/index.php#Area of a circle
Hi! I've published real eye opener content in context of the article "area of a circle". I'd like to share it. It's hosted by a free webhost service. I really don't know why it's blacklisted. Everyone, who likes geometry should see my site. Gmac4247 (talk) 11:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- But Wikipedia really isn't the proper place to promote your (or any) blog/site, at least according to the rules as I understand them. Sorry. — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 16:48, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- Link requested to be whitelisted:
gmac4247.000webhostapp.com/index.php/basic-geometry/area-and-perimeter-of-a-circle/
- 995510410#gmac4247.000webhostapp.com/index.php/basic-geometry/area-and-perimeter-of-a-circle/#area of a circle#circumference of a circle#squaring the circle#volume of a sphere
I agree, but I think, users could benefit from seeing the content on my site, because I've made detailed step-by-step explonations, to help users with lower experience in geometry, visualise the process. It's based on real user feedback. Gmac4247 (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Gmac4247:
Declined. It is not in Wikipedia's purpose to link to explanations, the explanations on Wikipedia should be sufficient to understand the topic. And if people then need more in-depth information they should use google. We are not writing a linkfarm. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Specific article on Project Gutenberg request
I'm drafting a list type article of all of the College of Wooster's Greek societies, past and present. One of the references which appears highly valuable for the article, and which in my draft (in my sandbox) I've been able to reference a couple dozen times, is at:
- self.gutenberg.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
The specific article is:
- Link requested to be whitelisted:
self.gutenberg.org/articles/phi_omega_sigma_(college_of_wooster)
I wish to add this specific link to the Whitelist, as it appears to be reliable and I've not found an alternative that I may use as an article citation. This proposed reference confirms many facts where I reference other sources. But it is the new information that this reference provides that would be helpful for my completing the article. Jax MN (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Jax MN:
Declined, self.gutenberg.org is a self-published source, and many articles there are sourced from 'free' sources like Wikipedia (see MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/May_2018#World_Heritage_Encyclopedia_mirrors). In line with that discussion at the spam blacklist, also this article states "Help to improve this article, make contributions at the Citational Source, sourced from Wikipedia". I do however have difficulty figuring out which revid from our article this is. Phi_Omega_Sigma_(College_of_Wooster) is now a redirect, it was before directed to Student social organizations at the College of Wooster#Phi Omega Sigma .28.CE.A6.CE.A9.CE.A3.29. That article is now also a redirect but before that happened that article was moved to List of student social organizations at the College of Wooster. Frustratingly, that article is now also a redirect, but it has a history. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Frustrating? Sure is. If I had known that the Gutenberg site and all articles on it were verboten, I wouldn't have laced so many usages into my draft article. It was darn good. I'm attempting to fix the problem you noticed, where a previous hatnoted page off of the main College of Wooster article had previously listed the Greeks, but had been deleted. I don't have visibility to deleted Wikipedia articles... It would be useful to review them to determine the basis on which they were deleted, and perhaps to utilize some of their writing as a base for an improved article as I clean up these various fraternity and collegiate pages. That's the intent - a re-write of the previous page with far better sourcing and clean formatting. Any further suggestions? I didn't want to open up the Gutenberg website except for that specific item. Jax MN (talk) 08:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Jax MN, we start to blacklist Wikipedia mirrors as they get often mis-used in circular referencing, and this set (as linked) was part of that effort. Which is the deleted article, I can have a look what we can rescue (as long as the reason is not copyvio or other major problems, I can userfy it for you)? Dirk Beetstra T C 08:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm really not clear on why you still want the link whitelisted. As noted, clearly, this is a wikipedia mirror of long-deleted material. It cannot be used as a source. To be transparent, this particular set of mirrors was blocked for exactly the reason that is generating this conversation; they have set up a deceptive series of websites in order to mask the original source of the material, and the attribution is deliberately vague. As noted, if you're wanting to re-create the original article, we can move the history over to draftspace, and you can work to address the concerns of the [Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of student social organizations at the College of Wooster|AFD that removed the material]. Kuru (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- I understand. I did not realize the article itself had been a discarded Wiki article. I will use the references it contained with the intent of posting a more useful article of my own. Thanks all. Jax MN (talk) 18:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Frustrating? Sure is. If I had known that the Gutenberg site and all articles on it were verboten, I wouldn't have laced so many usages into my draft article. It was darn good. I'm attempting to fix the problem you noticed, where a previous hatnoted page off of the main College of Wooster article had previously listed the Greeks, but had been deleted. I don't have visibility to deleted Wikipedia articles... It would be useful to review them to determine the basis on which they were deleted, and perhaps to utilize some of their writing as a base for an improved article as I clean up these various fraternity and collegiate pages. That's the intent - a re-write of the previous page with far better sourcing and clean formatting. Any further suggestions? I didn't want to open up the Gutenberg website except for that specific item. Jax MN (talk) 08:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
awardsandwinners.com
I wanted to use this link to add as a reference in the Nicole (German singer) and Echo Music Prize article.
awardsandwinners.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Link requested to be whitelisted: http://awardsandwinners.com/winner/?name=nicole&mid=/m/01w7tkh
-- GravityIsForSuckers (talk) 18:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- @GravityIsForSuckers:
Declined, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#Awardsandwinners, unreliable and possibly even circular . --Dirk Beetstra T C 06:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Proposed removals from Whitelist (web pages or link patterns to re-block)
General discussion
Blocking link
I want my article to publish without blocking google link how?? Sumaya farahath (talk) 08:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sumaya farahath, Wikipedia is not for advertising. Guy (help! - typo?) 10:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
It's not advertisement.its really legendary personality. Harish varma1 (talk) 18:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Harish varma1, please read the instructions at the top of this page, we need to know what you are talking about. Dirk Beetstra T C 12:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Right Wing News Sources
- breitbart.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- thegatewaypundit.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
- naturalnews.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
Wikipedia seems to have become a left wing thought silo, based on recent attempted clarifications to politicized issues surrounding the 2020 election. I recommend that the administrators thoroughly review the media landscape of what news sources are considered acceptable. There is widespread misunderstanding of the legitimacy of the “right wing”. As many editors are leftists, the entire platform has slid dangerously to the left. Haerdt (talk) 06:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Breitbart The Gateway Pundit NaturalNews
To name a few. Otherwise we are really limiting our political perspective when building this knowledge base Haerdt (talk) 06:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Including sources known to publish abject lies is not "limiting our political perspective". Please review WP:RSP and the archives of WP:RSN. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Haerdt: those sources were all blacklisted after community consensus. That means that the community does not want them, that the community does not think they are reliable (or even, that they are regularly completely wrong). And I am afraid that your evaluation (complaint?) is single sided, we would do exactly the same with left wing news sources if the community finds them unreliable, or plainly wrong. Your assumption of bias is wrong there. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Just to define:
- Breitbart, quote from article: "
The site has published a number of conspiracy theories and intentionally misleading stories.
" - The Gateway Pundit, quote from article: "
The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.
" - Natural News, quote from article: "
is an anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and fake news website known for promoting pseudoscience and far-right extremism.
"
- Breitbart, quote from article: "
- (all my bolding). Sources that have intentionally misleading stories, falsehoods and fake news are not sources that we use in Wikipedia, and therefore they are either strongly deprecated, or outright blacklisted (where material that is deemed suitable by community consensus can be included through whitelisting). --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
CNN has also published conspiracy theories and discussed them on air openly. Don’t you pay attention to that corporation? The right wing news sources losted above are just as far to the right as CNN is to the left. You all need to tale a long hard look in the mirror to see what you are doing to information communication. For the past four years, people of your political understandong have cried that POTUS is a fascist, yet here is fascism in practice. Haerdt (talk) 12:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)