Corvus cornix (talk | contribs) →Article deletion: Those who think this article should not be a redirect should spend some time actually sourcing it instead of reverting the redirect. |
→Article deletion: discussion, not unilateral deletion |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Those who think this article should not be a redirect should spend some time actually sourcing it instead of reverting the redirect. <font family="Comic sans">[[User:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:green">Corvus cornix</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:Green">talk</span>]]''</sub></font> 05:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC) |
Those who think this article should not be a redirect should spend some time actually sourcing it instead of reverting the redirect. <font family="Comic sans">[[User:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:green">Corvus cornix</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:Green">talk</span>]]''</sub></font> 05:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:You are completely out of line to lecture experienced users about proper Wikipedia etiquette. Deleting an entire article without discussion, as you have done, is tantamount to vandalism. This MUST be discussed, here. [[User:MrDarcy|Mr. Darcy]] <small>[[User talk:MrDarcy|talk]]</small> 02:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:57, 23 April 2011
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Novels: Short story Start‑class Mid‑importance ![]() | |||||||||||||||
|
An image on this page may be deleted
This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:Agoodmanishardtofindcover.jpg, found on A Good Man is Hard to Find (short story), has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Article deletion
While I agree that this article has some WP:OR problems (or just a lack of citations), deletion isn't the answer, especially not for a story this well-known. I'd like to see an effort to upgrade the article rather than a unilateral decision to delete it in favor of a redirect to the collection of the same name. Mr. Darcy talk 16:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
- I concur. Kittybrewster ☎ 04:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Those who think this article should not be a redirect should spend some time actually sourcing it instead of reverting the redirect. Corvus cornixtalk 05:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- You are completely out of line to lecture experienced users about proper Wikipedia etiquette. Deleting an entire article without discussion, as you have done, is tantamount to vandalism. This MUST be discussed, here. Mr. Darcy talk 02:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)