122.161.31.230 (talk) |
122.161.31.230 (talk) |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
you are no saint in this world, your blocks your vanalism , your edit wars made you one of the most infamous user on wiki.[[Special:Contributions/122.161.31.230|122.161.31.230]] ([[User talk:122.161.31.230|talk]]) 09:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC) |
you are no saint in this world, your blocks your vanalism , your edit wars made you one of the most infamous user on wiki.[[Special:Contributions/122.161.31.230|122.161.31.230]] ([[User talk:122.161.31.230|talk]]) 09:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
What that source dont has knowledge about Yield, look into the books and the works. You have been blocked over a dozen times for this same vandalism and pro-pakistani propaganda and you will be banned again if you try to enter another edit war. Give a suitable reason , i am not interested in entering into an edit war. If you have any suitable reason to remove the content then mention it otherwise leave your edit-war-mongering nature.[[Special:Contributions/122.161.31.230|122.161.31.230]] ([[User talk:122.161.31.230|talk]]) 09:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:46, 13 February 2012
![]() | Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / South Asia B‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Pakistan B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Neutrality
These gifted scientists and engineers along with a highly-dedicated team worked logically and economically to design, produce and test an extremely rugged device for the nation which enable the Islamic Republic of Pakistan from strength to strength. By the grace of Almighty Allah, the PAEC as an organization has proven to be the pride of the Pakistani nation.
I don't think this kind of self-congratulation should be on wikipedia.
Also, the last part of the article is between quotes but there is no reference. Monkeyget 13:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think it would be classified as vandalism even if it's not it would not be neutral. The referance can be sorted out. I'll try and find one. LOTRrules (talk) 01:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Upgrade
I added more valid and neutral informations. All the information based on the true facts borrowed from the different websites controlled by the different organizations. I tried my best to make this page more neutral. Most of the information has been taken from following websites:
- Pakistan's Atomic Testing
- Pakistan Post Office
- Yaum-e-Takbeer
- Yaum-e-Takbeer celebrated across country
Image copyright problem with Image:Pakistan Nuclear Test.jpg
The image Image:Pakistan Nuclear Test.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 81.137.222.172 (talk) 11:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Controversy section provides no sources at all! Its simple vandalism.
Snap Shot of the Test Teams
The image File:Cha1 lrg.jpg is added. So, If I have violated the Wikipedia's policy on Uploading the Image. I would suggest the image must be deleted because I do hold the copy rights of the image.
I have tried my best uploading the photo. I'm not an author of the photo nor I hold the copy rights of the image. It is a result of the research work of Carey Sublette's article "Pakistan Nuclear Weapon Program: 1998 The year of testing. I am also providing the link "http://www.nuclearweaponarchive.org/Pakistan/PakTests.html". The material was prepared by the Carey Sublette and it was prepared using materials provided by the Indian, Pakistani, and United States governments, by the Associated Press, Reuters, Agence France-Presse, The Times of India News Service, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, the Associated Press of Pakistan, the Press Trust of India, Science News, the Federation of American Scientists, and the Nuclear Weapons Archive.
The image is also used publically by the Pakistan's Geo TV. This is the same image that is been uploaded. There are two links: the first link is in the Urdu Language. The second link is in the English Language.
- May 28 (in Urdu)
- Nation observing Youm-e-Takbeer today —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.49.198.147 (talk) 10:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Pakistan before the Bangladesh War in 1971.jpg Nominated for Deletion
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Pakistan before the Bangladesh War in 1971.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 15 November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
Weasel? Specify.
Can you specify what phrases are using weasel words? If there aren't specifics I'll revert the tag. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
yield figure
the yield figure of both the chagai tests have been rejected by independent and western scholars , no data Support pakistan claim, references are provided of both wallace and franks as well as nuclear scientists journal who called the pakistan test only partially. The sources which reject pakistan claim also proves that main point of these claims was to match Indian claims(which are themselves contested).122.161.31.230 (talk) 09:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
You cant reject the same sources which contest Indian claims, the same sources put Pakistan yield to be even much more less than indian test and also give the potential reason that it was to MATCH THE INDIAN YIELD, and to make their people proud
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Pakistan/PakTests.html
you have to boost your nuclear science knowledge, both the claims of chagai-1 and chagai-2 have been contested by western seismologists similar to indian tests now you can say that Western experts have anti-asian views but you have to include their view point as well.122.161.31.230 (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- What ever the correct figures are, you don't need to edit war over multiple articles and hop IPs to going that content in. You need to revert your own edits and discuss the content here. As far as the content goes, the only organizations which actually measured the yields were Pakistani. The rejection by western sources who never measured anything is a redflag on its own. --lTopGunl (talk) 09:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
I understand your frustration but thats the world order, we asians always look towards west for confirmation and these same sources have been quoted in the indian tests section as well, even the chinese tests were questioned and all these sources have been mentioned reason all these are well known nuclear sources and you cannot reject all this. I am not saying that WESTERN SOURCES ARE MORE RELIABLE THAN PAKISTANI SOURCES but only mentioning that WESTERN SOURCES have contested pakistani claims. I am not judging pakistani and western sources , i am just mentioning the western sources. 122.161.31.230 (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Changing IPs, canvassing other users, making personal attacks is not the way to get content in. You need to discuss it on talk page. Many of your edits on other articles were simply vandalism. Your above claims are still disputed. for which you have given me no explanation. A source that has no idea about that yield can not be taken as a reliable source at all. --lTopGunl (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
you are no saint in this world, your blocks your vanalism , your edit wars made you one of the most infamous user on wiki.122.161.31.230 (talk) 09:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
What that source dont has knowledge about Yield, look into the books and the works. You have been blocked over a dozen times for this same vandalism and pro-pakistani propaganda and you will be banned again if you try to enter another edit war. Give a suitable reason , i am not interested in entering into an edit war. If you have any suitable reason to remove the content then mention it otherwise leave your edit-war-mongering nature.122.161.31.230 (talk) 09:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC)