Content deleted Content added
91.54.15.103 (talk) |
91.54.15.103 (talk) |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
This has been locked since September, yet it describes him as “misogynist” in the first sentence? Not exuding “neutral.” <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/172.221.177.38|172.221.177.38]] ([[User talk:172.221.177.38#top|talk]]) 18:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This has been locked since September, yet it describes him as “misogynist” in the first sentence? Not exuding “neutral.” <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/172.221.177.38|172.221.177.38]] ([[User talk:172.221.177.38#top|talk]]) 18:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::Exuding “thruth”. He exuded [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/19/violent-misogynic-fantasies-meghan-jeremy-clarkson- |
::Exuding “thruth”. He exuded "[https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/19/violent-misogynic-fantasies-meghan-jeremy-clarkson-sun Violent misogynistic fantasies]": He seemingly pinballed from one sexist, racist trope to another – the implication from his column being that Meghan is the manipulator, the voodoo priestess, the narcissist, the liar, the bewitcher, the polluter – for one purpose, which was to get people up in arms. Many public figures – from Carol Vorderman to Philip Pullman – took to social media to express their horror at these essentially violent fantasies. [https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/dec/21/jeremy-clarksons-abhorrent-views-on-meghan-reflect-the-society-we-live-in Clarkson’s abhorrent views on Meghan reflect the society we live in]. --[[Special:Contributions/91.54.15.103|91.54.15.103]] ([[User talk:91.54.15.103|talk]]) 21:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2022 == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2022 == |
Revision as of 00:42, 6 January 2023
![]() | Jeremy Clarkson was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unlock or Update
Yes, the man is controversial but the politics section reads like Brexit hasn't happened yet. Update or unlock please.
This has been locked since September, yet it describes him as “misogynist” in the first sentence? Not exuding “neutral.” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.221.177.38 (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Exuding “thruth”. He exuded "Violent misogynistic fantasies": He seemingly pinballed from one sexist, racist trope to another – the implication from his column being that Meghan is the manipulator, the voodoo priestess, the narcissist, the liar, the bewitcher, the polluter – for one purpose, which was to get people up in arms. Many public figures – from Carol Vorderman to Philip Pullman – took to social media to express their horror at these essentially violent fantasies. Clarkson’s abhorrent views on Meghan reflect the society we live in. --91.54.15.103 (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2022
In section relating to the Markle Sun piece (16Dec2022), add to the list of people objecting … “and his own daughter”. 84.69.155.51 (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RealAspects (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Just for the record, I felt the need to mention that at the moment this is covered in full in the related section:
Clarkson subsequently stated he was "horrified to have caused so much hurt" over his comments, which were also criticized by his daughter Emily
. Keivan.fTalk 20:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)