VictoriaGrayson (talk | contribs) |
Re-hash |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:: Yes, I'm agree with OccultZone. --[[User:Human3015|'''<span style="color:red;">Human</span><span style="color:green;">3015</span>''']] 09:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
:: Yes, I'm agree with OccultZone. --[[User:Human3015|'''<span style="color:red;">Human</span><span style="color:green;">3015</span>''']] 09:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
:::Yup, I also agree.[[User:VictoriaGrayson|VictoriaGrayson]]<sup>[[User talk:VictoriaGrayson|<b style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;color:#707">Talk</b>]]</sup> 12:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
:::Yup, I also agree.[[User:VictoriaGrayson|VictoriaGrayson]]<sup>[[User talk:VictoriaGrayson|<b style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;color:#707">Talk</b>]]</sup> 12:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
This seems to have been discussed before and the outcome is what is in the Wikipedia piece https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rape_in_India/Archive_1#Discussing_Consensus_about_Travel_Advisory_Writeup_and_section_re-org Why the re-hash now? [[User:PediaAcc|PediaAcc]] ([[User talk:PediaAcc|talk]]) 14:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:00, 23 April 2015
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyvio
Rape_in_India#Legal_response took a lot of its content from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Rape in India#Potential abuse concerns took from [1]. Please review our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 23:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Lead
There are still problem with the lead. Prior 6 March.[2] It read probably better than how it is doing now.
- Some of the main problems with the current lead includes:
- "The National Crime Records Bureau of India suggests", there is clearly no need to attribute the obvious facts. We don't write "According to Mr. X, 2+2 is 4".
- "Indian parliamentarians have expressed concern that the majority of rape cases go unreported", isn't it worldwide concern? How it is differing from rest of the countries? It is those stats, that have shared some uncommon aspects with other countries that's why they deserve a separate mention. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 23:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- The NCRB needs to be mentioned because it is the official, most referred to source for reported rape rates. The older version too mentioned NCRB. The next sentence can be written in many different ways. The mention of "Indian parliamentarians" implies that the issue of unreported cases has attracted the attention of highest law making body in their country – so I am okay with it. M Tracy Hunter (talk) 01:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- @VictoriaGrayson - a sentence about unreported cases is significant and relevant in the lead, WP:LEAD. If the consensus is to not have "Indian parliamentarians" phrase, I am okay with it as well. M Tracy Hunter (talk) 15:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Another section
@M Tracy Hunter: and @VictoriaGrayson:, what you have to say for Rape in India#Tourist advisories? It violates WP:NOTNEWS, and since it is having the opinions of politicians who are not expert in this field, it is also violating WP:SOAPBOX. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 09:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm agree with OccultZone. --Human3015 09:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yup, I also agree.VictoriaGraysonTalk 12:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm agree with OccultZone. --Human3015 09:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
This seems to have been discussed before and the outcome is what is in the Wikipedia piece https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rape_in_India/Archive_1#Discussing_Consensus_about_Travel_Advisory_Writeup_and_section_re-org Why the re-hash now? PediaAcc (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)