Added signature to unsigned comment |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
I note that under controversies, there's a mention of an expensive bill at one of his restaurants. Granted, the mention is focused on the media reaction to it, which is fair, but the story itself I believe is irrelevant to a wiki article about the man. I mean, the expensive bill included a number of bottles of the most expensive wine in the world (Petrus 2003), can hardly complain that it's expensive. it appears to be an expected attack from gutter clickbait journalists (e.g. Hull Live is a reference) and something I wouldn't expect to be noted in Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/37.228.203.133|37.228.203.133]] ([[User talk:37.228.203.133|talk]]) 16:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
I note that under controversies, there's a mention of an expensive bill at one of his restaurants. Granted, the mention is focused on the media reaction to it, which is fair, but the story itself I believe is irrelevant to a wiki article about the man. I mean, the expensive bill included a number of bottles of the most expensive wine in the world (Petrus 2003), can hardly complain that it's expensive. it appears to be an expected attack from gutter clickbait journalists (e.g. Hull Live is a reference) and something I wouldn't expect to be noted in Wikipedia. [[Special:Contributions/37.228.203.133|37.228.203.133]] ([[User talk:37.228.203.133|talk]]) 16:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Yes because he it's proven that he's a rotten chef and his food is not worth a fraction of what he charges. [[Special:Contributions/146.199.128.183|146.199.128.183]] ([[User talk:146.199.128.183|talk]]) 19:42, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
:Yes because he it's proven that he's a rotten chef and his food is not worth a fraction of what he charges. [[Special:Contributions/146.199.128.183|146.199.128.183]] ([[User talk:146.199.128.183|talk]]) 19:42, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
::it doesn't prove anything, but your comment displays your bias. Hardly becoming for a wiki entry imo [[User:GwanOuvit|GwanOuvit]] ([[User talk:GwanOuvit|talk]]) 19:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Disrespect at World Cup. == |
== Disrespect at World Cup. == |
Revision as of 19:09, 25 June 2023
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Punctuation
Proper placement of periods and commas, are ALWAYS WITHIN the quotation marks 2600:1700:eb91:4290:6d18:5ca4:50d8:9899 (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Confirm legitimacy of NY Post article?
Someone added a reference to a supposed controversy from an NY Post article about this man's restaurant hiring a chef for twelve euros an hour. I haven't seen any coverage from more well-respected, non-tabloid websites. NYP cites DailyMail, another tabloid with journalistic aspirations. NYP has a poor rating for factual reporting. DailyMail cites an ad on caterer.com, but anyone can take out an ad on that website for $165. There's no reaction from the company owned by "Salt Bae," or any indication that I've seen that they know about the accusation or have been contacted by any of these tabloid papers. Seems like the reference in the article with citation is creating undue traffic for NYP. I'd recommend it be removed until an actual controversy is established. A paper writing a short article doesn't necessarily make the situation a controversy. Please also be aware that this is a biography of a living person, and promoting unsubstantiated claims is strictly prohibited. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 11:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- I removed the link and mention. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 11:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- User:Amffy restored my changes without hitting the undo button. I have once again removed their link to a tabloid website and description of the dubious controversy. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- User:Tmorw manually restored the changes without discussion. I've removed the link again. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Is the expensive bill story relevant?
I note that under controversies, there's a mention of an expensive bill at one of his restaurants. Granted, the mention is focused on the media reaction to it, which is fair, but the story itself I believe is irrelevant to a wiki article about the man. I mean, the expensive bill included a number of bottles of the most expensive wine in the world (Petrus 2003), can hardly complain that it's expensive. it appears to be an expected attack from gutter clickbait journalists (e.g. Hull Live is a reference) and something I wouldn't expect to be noted in Wikipedia. 37.228.203.133 (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yes because he it's proven that he's a rotten chef and his food is not worth a fraction of what he charges. 146.199.128.183 (talk) 19:42, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- it doesn't prove anything, but your comment displays your bias. Hardly becoming for a wiki entry imo GwanOuvit (talk) 19:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Disrespect at World Cup.
He disrespected and almost harrased the Argentinien Team, after they won the world Cup Finals. 2001:4BC9:A42:E57:1:2:F26D:9E55 (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC)