BarrelProof (talk | contribs) →Requested move 23 March 2022: correction |
Axem Titanium (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
*Note that [[Square (payment system)]] also currently exists even though the company its self has changed name[[https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=Square_(video_game_company)|Block,_Inc.|Square_(payment_system)]]. '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 08:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC) |
*Note that [[Square (payment system)]] also currently exists even though the company its self has changed name[[https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=Square_(video_game_company)|Block,_Inc.|Square_(payment_system)]]. '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 08:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
*:Payment system and company are not competing disambiguations. In this case, the payment system is not a company since it is run by Block, Inc., it is a brand of a larger company. [[User:Zxcvbnm|ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ]] ([[User talk:Zxcvbnm|ᴛ]]) 09:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC) |
*:Payment system and company are not competing disambiguations. In this case, the payment system is not a company since it is run by Block, Inc., it is a brand of a larger company. [[User:Zxcvbnm|ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ]] ([[User talk:Zxcvbnm|ᴛ]]) 09:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support'''. Parenthetical disambiguators in article titles need only distinguish between existing non-redirect articles. The rest is accomplished using hatnotes and redirects as appropriate. [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] ([[User talk:Axem Titanium|talk]]) 10:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:38, 26 March 2022
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Video games B‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Square Enix B‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Square VS Square Co., Ltd.
Do you feel we should mention games produced by Square Co., Ltd. before they were an independent company? As pointed out in my King's Knight article, King's Knight was not, in fact, the first game that Square developed. It WAS the first they developed as Square Co., Ltd. However, they produced and/or published no less than six games simply as "Square": The Death Trap, Will, Thexder, Dragon Slayer, Cruise Chaser Blassty, and Alpha, respectively. Thexder was developed by Game Arts and published by Square for the Famicom, and Dragon Slayer was produced by Falcom but published by Square for the MSX, while the rest were produced and published by Square. Most of these games were released on various Japanese computers (notably the NEC PC-8801 and PC-8901) and never saw light outside of Japan. I have the release months and years if you guys are interested in placing this on the site.
EDIT: I also notice that massive gaps of games are missing in any given platform. There is some debate as to why they shouldn't be included, since this is an English version of Wikipedia, and these games (i.e. 'Square's Tom Sawyer' for Famicom) were never ported to English-speaking countries. On the other hand, Final Fantasy III never saw an English release, but is still listed. One could argue that Final Fantasy III is more relevant since it's part of Square's flagship series and, furthermore, it has had an (albeit unofficial) English translation. These arguments don't hold much water, however.
Finally, I'm wondering if I'm the only one that cares to advance this discussion and/or edit the site. :/ Somebody prove me wrong. - Tristam 12:49 a.m., 24 Jul 2005 (CST)
- Though it's been more than a year since you've brought it up, I just came across this now and I very much agree. From what little data I have, the company known as "Square" was originally a label of software company Denyūsha; this division seemed to have been managed by Hironobu Sakaguchi's brother. The split from Denyūsha took place around the same time as Nasir Gebelli, Takashi Tokita and Akitoshi Kawazu were hired on staff. (One of the first games that Tokita worked on, it seems, was Aliens: Alien 2, an MSX platformer loosely based on the Ridley Scott film.) This critical mass of new talent seemed to cause enough of an upheaval for Hironobu Sakaguchi to ask for an amicable split from his parent company (and a shift in focus to the Famicom).
- That's as far as I've gotten in research of this stage of history, anyway. There is a Japanese site called ROAD OF SQUARE that I've been pointed to in the past, which most likely contains data pertaining to this era and the people involved; due to my backlog, though, I haven't been able to get around to feeding it through the translator. X\
- I really would like to see Denyūsha-era Square outlined in this article. Many Americans who do know about it seem to gloss over the fact that there was a history going further back, not realizing that it helped set the stage for the direction the Sakaguchi brothers took their own splinter faction (which was a drastic shift in focus to goals more artistic rather than commercial). The context would further help with present-day context in explaining Hironobu Sakaguchi's own reasoning for founding Mistwalker and AQ Interactive.
- Highly recommended that this line of questioning be pursued, thanks. --E. Megas 17:24, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
"Squaresoft" was never the name of the company to begin with, it's only a brand name they (used to) employ. The Japanese company name was Square Co., Ltd. although it did have a US subsidiary called Square Soft, Inc. Of course, it's all Square Enix now.
Square VS Squaresoft
That's what I thought too, can anybody confirm this for sure? If it's true, then I think we should move Squaresoft content to Square (Videogame company) or something like that and add a redirect from Squaresoft. --xDCDx 13:38, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure about that idea. I don't think I consider Square's history to be the same thing as Square Enix's. Is Chrono Trigger a Square-Enix game? Merging the articles would suggest that it is, when clearly it is a Square game. - Vague Rant 07:04, Oct 20, 2004 (UTC)
Of course not, someboy altered my coment, I have restored it. My proposal was renaming the article to Square (Videogame company), which was the actual name of the company before the merger. --xDCDx 20:01, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Squaresoft as a brand name
I'm not exactly willing to stake my life on this, but it was my understanding that the name "Squaresoft" was only used as a brand by Square during the 16-bit era: while my imported copy of Live A Live, for instance, bears the Squaresoft name, my imported copy of Final Fantasy VII does not. American localizations continued to use the "Squaresoft" name because it was still the name of the American branch, not because the parent corporation was still actively using it as a brand name. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though. – Seancdaug 17:57, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
- Well, I don't have any imported games. However, I've found a couple of sites [1] [2] that show cover scans with "Squaresoft" everywhere - US, Japan, and Europe. This Japanese flash animation from the official site, dating from just before the Enix merger, also says "Squaresoft," so it seems pretty settled to me. And yes, I have little enough of a life to go searching for this stuff. :P Beinsane 22:22, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, well. I stand humbly corrected, then. :-) – Seancdaug 22:35, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
Merger
I think the merger with Enix should be somehow given in the first paragraph, currently the lead in sounds like the company doesn't exist anymore at all. I think a simple "It merged with Enix in ... and became part of Square Enix." should be enough. The article should also tell the reader at the beginning, why this company is relevant, currently it launches straight in the history of the company, which, imho, should be under a History heading below the ToC. --84.184.105.203 12:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's a good suggestion, and I'm currently creating a massive "History" section. It may not be done for a little while though. :) --Tristam 16:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, I'll put it in the intro paragraph! —Wikibarista 04:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
square/squaresoft logo font?
i've been trying to find this font for years (the italic futura-looking one with the red triangle A). is it an actual font of which square licensed a modification, or is it a custom font commissioned exclusively for square? -alex rosario —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.27 (talk) 22:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge in Game Designers Studio
It is a three sentence blurb that can be covered in this article without its own whole article, and makes this article more comprehensive. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Are you sure there's not enough information available to make the article stands on its own? Akitoshi Kawazu did a lot of interviews about the FF Crystal Chronicles series; some stuff that aren't directly relevant to that series could go in the Game Designers Studio article instead. I think the reason the article is so small is because people simply don't care much about the "meta-game" topics in general. It could also be because there's not much to say to begin with, but are we sure of it? Megata Sanshiro (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've merged the article. There doesn't seem to be much information and it can be added in this main article anyway. Kariteh (talk) 11:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Square Co. → Square (company) — Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies): "When disambiguation is needed, the legal status, an appended "(company)", or other suffix can be used to disambiguate". "Square Co." is not a commonly used name and it gives off the wrong vibe that "Co." is the legal status, when in fact it is "Co., Ltd.". Either move to "Square (company)" or "Square Co., Ltd.". Prime Blue (talk) 18:56, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'd be fine with Square (company), but I think "Square Co., Ltd." is excessive. The current disambiguation is sufficient. Powers T 00:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
What happened to the Family Friendly Squaresoft (1983-1996)?
Hello there as you know I've grew up with Squaresofts Nintendo games in the 1980s and 1990s. When the America Squaresoft brought games from Japan around 1987. They made it available and made NES and SNES games aimed at families and kids. Of course this was in the days of video game censorship. Anyways they make Final Fantasy 1 for NES. Squaresoft also made Final Fantasy 4, Mystic quest and 6. They also made The Secret of Mana, Chrono Trigger, Breath of Fire 1, Secret of Evermore and Super Mario RPG. They didn't have any swearing, there was a little violence in the NES and SNES games. But those Nintendo RPGs had a great story.
Then in 1997 the America Squaresoft team left Nintendo and Partnered with the Playstation company and made Playstation RPG games aimed at Teens and Adults. They made the very first teen swearing, real violent Final Fantasy 7 game. They continued on with putting swearing and violence in Final Fantasy 8, 9, 10 and Tactics. And also made other Teen RPG playstation 1 games. Then they made a Final Fantasy movie which didn't do too well at the box office.
Then Squaresoft merged with Enix and they still continue to making Teen swearing and violent RPG games.
Anyways this is only my thoughts about my feelings toward Squaresoft when it made wonderful RPG games to bad teen RPG games. Due to neutral point of view of wikipedia I cannot post it in the wikipedia page as it is not mine. I just wanted people to know there used to be a time when Squaresoft made clean family friendly RPG games in the NES, SNES Nintendo era. I hope this article is ok to be in the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrosswalkX (talk • contribs) 02:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, the "family friendly" stuff was mostly due to Nintendo of America's censorship. In the Japanese versions of some of their games, there were mild curses, some sprites showed a lot more bare skin, Pubs were Bars, some of the drinks were explicitly referred to as alcoholic beverages, there was some religious iconagraphy, and various other things that Nintendo of America didn't want on their system. What you've seen post-SNES from Square is just the exact same style of games they made in Japan, just without any NoA censorship. That's how their games have always been. You just never got to see them in their original, unfiltered form until the PlayStation years. Zeikcied (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Name Origins
Is there an interview or other external material that explains the origins of the company's name: Square? (Which I find amusing considering the company logo clearly contains a triangle.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.231.159.204 (talk) 07:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Newly translated interview
The History of Square – 1992 Developer Interview originally featured in Dengeki SFC magazine TarkusABtalk 12:45, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 29 September 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 23:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Square (company) → Square (video game company) – This current title seems like WP:INCOMPLETEDAB because of Square, Inc. The common name for that Square is also "Square" - their logo, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and website all use it undisambiguated. Seems hard to argue that Square (company) could not easily point to both pages here. (For what it's worth, the Square, Inc. page is viewed much more than Square (company), so I have to imagine there could be some WP:ASTONISH at play.) Nohomersryan (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom, both seem indeed to be just "Square" also Square, Inc. gets 24,387 views compared to 6,770 for the video company. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:27, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:29, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support makes sense per nom. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 23 March 2022
Square (video game company) → Square (company) – Square, Inc. has been moved to Block, Inc., making the less concise disambiguation unnecessary, as there is no other article that is a company called "Square". The article can be moved back to its former name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose: Moving the other article doesn't make the ambiguity go away. WP:DEFUNCT names for notable topics continue to have notability. Wikipedia covers all of history, not just what is current at the moment. No evidence has been provided to justify this WP:INCOMPLETEDAB proposal, and I seriously doubt that such evidence exists. — BarrelProof (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- I am not saying there is no more ambiguity anymore, but a hatnote can solve the ambiguity. Square(soft) will be the primary topic now, however, since it is a totally defunct name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- A defunct status or an official renaming does not automatically reduce the notability of a name. Do we have any evidence that the overwhelming majority of readers who look for "Square (company)" are looking for the video game company? Do we have any evidence that the video game company has much greater long-term significance than the financial services company? Such justifications seem absent here; only the current status of the naming has been presented as the rationale, but current status has absolutely nothing to do with whether something is a primary topic or not. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC does not mention current status at all. Moreover, WP:partial disambiguation is only used in exceptionally dominant cases on Wikipedia, such as Thriller (album). This case does not have any argument for exceptional dominance. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- I am not saying there is no more ambiguity anymore, but a hatnote can solve the ambiguity. Square(soft) will be the primary topic now, however, since it is a totally defunct name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note that Square (payment system) also currently exists even though the company its self has changed name[[3]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Payment system and company are not competing disambiguations. In this case, the payment system is not a company since it is run by Block, Inc., it is a brand of a larger company. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Parenthetical disambiguators in article titles need only distinguish between existing non-redirect articles. The rest is accomplished using hatnotes and redirects as appropriate. Axem Titanium (talk) 10:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)