Georgelazenby (talk | contribs) →potential missing word: Reply Tag: Reply |
62.166.252.25 (talk) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=180|archive_units=days|archive_bot=
{{American English}}
{{Article history
|action1=FAC
Line 32 ⟶ 31:
|topic=film
}}
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Chess|importance=Bottom}}
▲{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=GA|filmbio-priority=Top|filmbio-work-group=yes|listas=Kubrick, Stanley}}
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject
▲{{WikiProject Hertfordshire|class=GA|importance=High}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 48 ⟶ 45:
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:Stanley Kubrick/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn ▼
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes ▼
}}
{{Press
|collapsed=no
Line 69 ⟶ 67:
}}
{{annual readership}}
▲{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
▲|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes
== Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2023 ==▼
{{edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=yes}}▼
== Semi-protected edit request on 21 June 2023 ==▼
{{edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=yes}}▼
== potential missing word ==
Line 120 ⟶ 79:
:I vote for the '''[and]''' option. I think that sounds great! [[User:Georgelazenby|Georgelazenby]] ([[User talk:Georgelazenby|talk]]) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." [[User:BillyShearsss|BillyShearsss]] ([[User talk:BillyShearsss|talk]]) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. [[User:EphemeralPerpetuals|<span style="font: small-caps 15px times; color:#CC5500">EphemeralPerpetuals <small>(they/them)</small></span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:EphemeralPerpetuals|<b style="font: small-caps 12px times; color:#000000">talk</b>]]</sup> 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
== Barry Lyndon: Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens ==
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. [[Special:Contributions/202.190.25.42|202.190.25.42]] ([[User talk:202.190.25.42|talk]]) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 [[User:Andyamo72|Andyamo72]] ([[User talk:Andyamo72|talk]]) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> <code><nowiki>'''[[</nowiki>'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> ([[User talk:CanonNi|talk]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/CanonNi|contribs]]) 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
::Not done. What do you want this to be used as a source ''for''? [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
==AFI==
{{Edit semi-protected|Stanley Kubrick|answered=yes}}
About ''The Shining'', the article states "and the American Film Institute has ranked it as the 27th greatest thriller film of all time". I'm pretty sure it's at #29 and not #27. Also, I suggest adding "in 2001", since the ranking is from that year. And maybe include an internal link to [[AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills]], for instance the text "has ranked it". --[[Special:Contributions/62.166.252.25|62.166.252.25]] ([[User talk:62.166.252.25|talk]]) 11:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> I confirmed that 29 is correct with the existing source and also made these other changes, thanks. [[User:Jamedeus|Jamedeus]] ([[User talk:Jamedeus|talk]]) 15:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks. --[[Special:Contributions/62.166.252.25|62.166.252.25]] ([[User talk:62.166.252.25|talk]]) 19:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
|
Latest revision as of 19:19, 25 May 2024
![]() | Stanley Kubrick has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
potential missing word
Current quote: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." Possibilities: "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films [that|which] broke new cinematic ground are now considered landmarks." or "Despite the notoriety this provoked among actors, many of Kubrick's films broke new cinematic ground [and] are now considered landmarks." or something else! 213.120.28.36 (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- I vote for the [and] option. I think that sounds great! Georgelazenby (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024
The second sentence says "Widely considered one of the...". It should say "Widely considered as one of the..." BillyShearsss (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Not done: The use of "as" would be redundant here - the current phrasing works fine. EphemeralPerpetuals (they/them)talk 01:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Barry Lyndon: Zeiss 50mm F/0.7 lens
The source doesn't support the claim that this lens was intended for satellite photography. 202.190.25.42 (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2024
Add in as source: Kubrick: An Odyssey (February 2024), by Robert P. Kolker and Nathan Abrams; Pegasus Books, Ltd.; ISBN: 978-1-63936-624-8; https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Kubrick/Robert-P-Kolker/9781639366248 Andyamo72 (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Done
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. What do you want this to be used as a source for? Nikkimaria (talk) 03:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
AFI
About The Shining, the article states "and the American Film Institute has ranked it as the 27th greatest thriller film of all time". I'm pretty sure it's at #29 and not #27. Also, I suggest adding "in 2001", since the ranking is from that year. And maybe include an internal link to AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills, for instance the text "has ranked it". --62.166.252.25 (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Done I confirmed that 29 is correct with the existing source and also made these other changes, thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 15:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. --62.166.252.25 (talk) 19:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)