This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
episodes source
where are the sources for the upcoming episodes of the loud house? Crazybob2014 (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- wait i found it. [1] Crazybob2014 (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Lucy is not "Emo"
Her clothing, love for gothic poetry and brand of gloominess correlates directly with Goth subculture, and has nothing to do with Emo subculture. Please stop saying she's emo in her description, it's just flat out wrong. Mrmoustache14 (talk) 09:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not the one who has been adding "emo" back recently, but it should be noted that she is called an emo in several sources. Previous editors have referred to this article and the first Comic Con comic. Calling her goth because you think her "brand of gloominess correlates directly with goth subculture" probably qualifies as original research. 108.20.47.212 (talk) 23:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
How is the show not Canadian?
I put that the show was American/Canadian in the title and Canadian in categories and the lead was removed soon and the categories were removed days later. This show is animated in Canada, but writing, voicing, and everything else is American. How is not Canadian as well? If Johnny Test and other shows are considered both American and Canadian, when Test was made by an American, written in the US, produced there, but only animated there and gets called a Canadian cartoon by many, how is this also not Canadian? I feel like it's a hybrid of both. Does anyone else think we should make it say it's both US/Canadian? Cyanidethistles (talk) 01:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
I agree, it makes no sense. I added back the categories and the American-Canadian part. I left a note to see this discussion if anyone wants to revert it. --NickSpark (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks man. I agree, the show definitely is Canadian as well seeing as it was animated in Ottawa of course. Even the voice actor for Lincoln is Canadian from what I've seen. Even without knowing it was made in Canada, I could tell it was Canadian in some way by the fact they used Toon Boom, the Flash-like animation program. 08:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Multiple people have taken off the Canada info. One user used "No" as a reason for reverting the addition, and nobody has ever provided a valid reason for their edit(s). I left another note to see/join this discussion. --NickSpark (talk) 23:11, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
To save time, I'll list some sources that prove it's animated in Canada:
- 1 - Jam Filled's website. Lists TLH under Ottawa work.
- 2 - Article from Animation Magazine about Jam Filled, calling it a "studio headquartered in Ottawa...the studio provides service animation for The Loud House and The Bagel and Becky Show for Nickelodeon."
- 3 - Article from The Hollywood Reporter: "Jam Filled Entertainment animates Nickelodeon's 'The Loud House,' which just introduced a same-sex married couple."
- 4 - Post from the show's confirmed Instagram account. The description says, "Our team from Jam Filled Entertainment in Ottawa came to visit today."
I tried to find something in Wikipedia's guidelines about people removing content just because they don't like it. The closest I could find is WP:IDONTLIKEIT which technically only applies to article deletion. However, this scenario is very similar. --NickSpark (talk) 23:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- @NickSpark: "2 - Article from Animation Magazine about Jam Filled, calling it a "studio headquartered in Ottawa...the studio provides service animation for The Loud House and The Bagel and Becky Show for Nickelodeon.""... A Canadian company providing service animation does NOT make it a Canadian show. We don't consider other American shows Canadian/Korean/Japanese/European because service animation is done in those countries, so why should we do the same here? ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 00:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Would you mind if I added a sentence like "Service animation for the show is provided by Jam Filled Entertainment in Ottawa, Canada" to one of the first 2 paragraphs, without changing the American television series part? That way, it will be clear that the show is animated in Canada, but it won't sound like other processes are completed there. I don't necessarily want to call it American-Canadian, I just want to put the info in the lead. --NickSpark (talk) 00:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Cereal Offender
I watched the "Cereal Offender" episode yesterday on YTV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.73.139 (talk) 21:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- WP:OFFTOPIC, not important nor does anyone care. 173.77.156.189 (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Episodes
In the new press release regarding the season 3 order Nickelodeon has written that the total count of episodes will be 78. 26*3=78. Means Season 2 is also going to consist of 26 episodes. Should it now be changed or is it just theory? --H8149 (talk) 18:42, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Characters
Vandalism is done!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carmen Melendez (talk • contribs) 21:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Animations style
Is tlh flash or traditional animations82.38.157.176 (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Flash. Grapesoda22 (✉) 05:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Odds
What the odds of having 11 children? And what the odds of only one of them being a boy? Might be interesting to add in?82.38.157.176 (talk) 13:14, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Luna is Bisexual
In a recent episode called "L is For Love", it's revealed that Luna has a crush on a girl named Sam. 5:58, June 15, 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.69.179 (talk)
Edit request
In the section Characters/Main, the description for Lincoln Loud now begins:
- Lincoln Loud (voiced by Sean Ryan Fox in the pilot, Grant Palmer in episodes 1–22,[6],Collin Dean in episodes 23–78, Aiden Lewandowski in episodes 79-present)
This should be edited to delete the word "unfortunately". 192.35.35.36 (talk) 22:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
How Can Anyone Not See This?
Lynn is clearly a female's name only. Lynn Sr.'s name should not even be Lynn, yet it is. And as for "Jr.", the "junior" or "Jr." title respectfully goes for only males named after their father, not for girls. And "Jr" is also only if the boy named after his father shares all first, middle and last name, which is also why I don't understand why Frank Sinatra Jr. is a junior if he doesn't share his father, Frank Sinatra Sr.'s middle name Albert, and his middle name is Wayne. But I'm getting off topic here, this is about The Loud House. Also, ALSO I see perfectly how Rin is a unisex name in Japan, but not Lynn for America. Why didn't the creators just name Lynn Sr "Louis" or something if they wanted for all L names except for Rita? I mean, seriously, why not!? PizzaPieLoveHandle07 (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Uh, no – "Lynn" is also a male name: e.g. Lynn Swann. See also: Lynn (name). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) :Lynn (name) is mainly female not not exclusively. Jr. is a valid generational suffix for women, it is just not that common and yes all the names should be the same but if middle name not commonly used it is a commonly used differentiator. Winifred Sackville Stoner Jr. is an example for women. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- The OP is Gabriella~four.3-6. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:34, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 October 2017
DO NOT ADD THE CARTOON BREW ARTICLE. AS OF RIGHT NOW, NOTHING HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY SAVINO, NICK, VIACOM, OR ANY TLH STAFF THAT THE RUMORS ARE TRUE. THANK YOU 75.136.204.242 (talk) 15:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not done: This is a complaint/rant without a specific request to edit the article. —KuyaBriBriTalk 16:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Sexual harassment allegations
Cartoon Brew published an article stating that Chris Savino was suspected from Nickelodeon for sexual harassment. This was picked up by other outlets (Deadline, IndieWire, Variety). Those sources cite back to the Cartoon Brew article. However, given the BLP concerns here I think we should wait until other sources report this without basing their reporting on the Cartoon Brew article. If this occurs, we can include it. Until then, let's wait. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
PLEASE REMEMBER There is still no official statement from Nickelodeon regarding this whole situation. I wanted to make this post to briefly let you know that this is not confirmed and we don't know how The Loud House will be affected in the future IF this all turns out to be true. Do not immediately get mad at either side, because nothing is 100% as of now. So PLEASE NOT DO NOT ADD THE CARTOON BREW ARTICLE. Bang. (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think it needs to be "confirmed". Rather, we need other sources to report it independently (see WP:TRUTH). EvergreenFir (talk) 18:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Understood. Bang. (talk) 18:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Adding to the list of sources citing the Cartoon Brew article: Hollywood Reporter, People, Newsweek. Wondering at what point do we say "enough other places are repeating it, so maybe we include it". Would prefer some other source say it in their own voice though. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir: My take on this is that this news should likely not be repeated at this article, but that it should be mentioned at Chris Savino (and I'd use The Hollywood Reporter cite, and possibly the Newsweek one) where it is definitely 100% relevant to the subject's career. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Agree that it's relevant, just concerned about lack of confirmation. I think if we do include it, it needs to be clear that it's based on the Cartoon Brew reporting. At least for now. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir: OK, I see the quandary... Here's what I am getting out of THR article – they seem to be (independently) confirming that Savino has been suspended, but they are citing Cartoon Brew on the details of the accusations. IOW, I think there is enough independent reporting here to merit including the suspension in a Wikipedia article (you can always weasel-word it a little – e.g. "It was reported that..."), even without Nickelodeon confirming it. However, the particular accusation (e.g. "...up to a dozen women...") should probably be left out of any addition to an article on WP:BLP, etc. grounds. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Ah, okay, I see what you're saying now. I think we could go with that for the Chris Savino article. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- He's officially fired. New Hollywood Reporter article. Can't edit it myself. Kianworld (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Ah, okay, I see what you're saying now. I think we could go with that for the Chris Savino article. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:52, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir: OK, I see the quandary... Here's what I am getting out of THR article – they seem to be (independently) confirming that Savino has been suspended, but they are citing Cartoon Brew on the details of the accusations. IOW, I think there is enough independent reporting here to merit including the suspension in a Wikipedia article (you can always weasel-word it a little – e.g. "It was reported that..."), even without Nickelodeon confirming it. However, the particular accusation (e.g. "...up to a dozen women...") should probably be left out of any addition to an article on WP:BLP, etc. grounds. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- @IJBall: Agree that it's relevant, just concerned about lack of confirmation. I think if we do include it, it needs to be clear that it's based on the Cartoon Brew reporting. At least for now. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir: My take on this is that this news should likely not be repeated at this article, but that it should be mentioned at Chris Savino (and I'd use The Hollywood Reporter cite, and possibly the Newsweek one) where it is definitely 100% relevant to the subject's career. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- Adding to the list of sources citing the Cartoon Brew article: Hollywood Reporter, People, Newsweek. Wondering at what point do we say "enough other places are repeating it, so maybe we include it". Would prefer some other source say it in their own voice though. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- Understood. Bang. (talk) 18:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
One thing to note is that on this article, all we should state is that he was fired, while the details should be posted on Chris Savino's page. Similar to the cast departures on Bizaardvark and Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn, albeit those were under a lot less severe circumstances, the exact details are complex and are more appropriate, again, on the person's page. See the Jake Paul discussion here for more info. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
The audio format is Dolby Digital 5.1. Not Stereo.
l think the audio format Dolby Digital as well know Dip771 (talk) 15:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2018
Arcade ghost (talk) 15:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC) who ever previouly edited this is a moron. the loud houses reception has been removed so i want that BACK. and the opening paragraph has been shortened and it keeps on saying it airs on AFN when in reality it airs on nickelodeon
- Done Vandalism reverted but please don't call editors morons EvergreenFir (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Edit Request
Can somebody make a "in other media" like every other cartoon show has and also a "list of loud house charaters" page. It will really make this page more shorter and simple. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcade ghost (talk • contribs) 17:13, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Needs some edit!
This is not a sitcom! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FayyadAllhassan (talk • contribs) 17:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Category Request
Can this article be added to Category:Cartoon Controversies? 24.98.30.150 (talk) 02:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Merger proposal
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Consensus was against the proposed merger. --Justthefacts9 (talk) 10:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
I propose that Howard and Harold McBride be merged into The Loud House. They are currently the only characters in the show to have a separate page. They are secondary characters who appeared in only nine 11-minute segments out of more than 100 in the show. Much of the page seems to be regarding their reception, which can be transferred to the Reception section on The Loud House. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:C930:CCA4:4A03:E075:67C6 (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose It doesn't matter that they are secondary characters, the article itself is sufficiently notable as shown by content and references to meet WP:GNG. Merging it back to this article would be inappropriate now. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:50, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Disagree - Being the first one to have a separate page shouldn't be the reason to the merging. Considering how many controversies because of this couple's existence, The Loud House is still a young show (2016-), if it becomes more popular, who knows if Lincoln Loud, the main protagonist, will have a separate page for himself, just like the case of Dipper and Mabel Pines. - George6VI (talk) 08:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - the characters are more than notable enough to merit their own article. --Justthefacts9 (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2018
Please add
to the top of the article. 2601:241:300:C930:CCA4:4A03:E075:67C6 (talk) 04:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Done Gulumeemee (talk) 09:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Description of AFA
@Geraldo Perez: Regarding this revert, the American Family Association is described on its article as a fundamentalist Christian group and as a hate group. It is inaccurate to describe it as a "conservative media group" as that implies that this group is a mainstream conservative organization, which is not the case. --Justthefacts9 (talk) 08:52, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Justthefacts9: It is listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). That is an opinion by an opposing advocacy group, hardly a statement of unbiased fact. For this article keep it neutral. It is accurate to describe it as a "conservative media group". There is no need to put contentious pejorative statements in this article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 09:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez: The Southern Poverty Law Center is a non-profit civil rights organization whose listings of hate groups is considered to be authoritative by law enforcement agencies including the FBI. Moreover, the American Family Association is not described as a "conservative media group" on its own article, so why describe it as such here? --Justthefacts9 (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Justthefacts9: The article describes them as "a non-profit organization that promotes fundamentalist Christian values". SPLC is a source of information used by the FBI. Its being authoritative in their classifications is also widely disputed and considered overbroad or unwarranted. This article is not the place to treat as fact an opinion by an advocacy group. Keep it neutral and leave contentious content in the proper articles where a full in context coverage can be documented. This article is not the place for it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez: Then let's use the description that the article for the American Family Association does instead of an inaccurate description. --Justthefacts9 (talk) 10:52, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Better idea: use whatever the AFA refers to itself as. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:34, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- The AFA refers to itself as a "Christian organization", but it is objectively a fundamentalist Christian group (as properly described in its article). It is inaccurate and misleading to suggest that AFA is a mainstream conservative or mainstream Christian organization. --Justthefacts9 (talk) 18:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- For the purposes of this article it is sufficient to label the two exemplars listed as conservative media groups. The names are linked for readers who want additional information about the groups. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Then perhaps the best and simplest solution here is to remove the descriptor. Readers can click on the article link if they wish to find a description of the group in question. --Justthefacts9 (talk) 10:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- For the purposes of this article it is sufficient to label the two exemplars listed as conservative media groups. The names are linked for readers who want additional information about the groups. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- The AFA refers to itself as a "Christian organization", but it is objectively a fundamentalist Christian group (as properly described in its article). It is inaccurate and misleading to suggest that AFA is a mainstream conservative or mainstream Christian organization. --Justthefacts9 (talk) 18:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Better idea: use whatever the AFA refers to itself as. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:34, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez: Then let's use the description that the article for the American Family Association does instead of an inaccurate description. --Justthefacts9 (talk) 10:52, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Justthefacts9: The article describes them as "a non-profit organization that promotes fundamentalist Christian values". SPLC is a source of information used by the FBI. Its being authoritative in their classifications is also widely disputed and considered overbroad or unwarranted. This article is not the place to treat as fact an opinion by an advocacy group. Keep it neutral and leave contentious content in the proper articles where a full in context coverage can be documented. This article is not the place for it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez: The Southern Poverty Law Center is a non-profit civil rights organization whose listings of hate groups is considered to be authoritative by law enforcement agencies including the FBI. Moreover, the American Family Association is not described as a "conservative media group" on its own article, so why describe it as such here? --Justthefacts9 (talk) 09:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- No. Geraldo Perez is right – we should not be throwing around words like "hate group" unless it is predominantly referred to as such in the preponderance of sources. One source calling that does not cut it. Definitely violates WP:NPOV. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Suggest List of Loud House Characters
The character list has increased significantly in the last year, many of them being one-off characters. I suggest there should be a separate page titled "List of Loud House Characters", like many other shows have, to clear up the main page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickterra (talk • contribs) 00:02, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Propose list of characters split
The characters section is getting ridiculous long and ridiculously messy and should be split. Also, why do we have sections for each different group? We should be properly following the standard "main," "recurring," and "notable guest stars" method. For non-main characters, if they don't fall into either of the latter two, they don't get listed. Amaury (talk | contribs) 04:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- I trust the judgment here and endorse your categorization method--Fradio71 (talk) 07:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Endorse a split. The cast section is ridiculously long now (and should likely be trimmed even after splitting...). Remember – after splitting to at least leave a "simple" cast list of the main characters here. A lot of people split out character lists like this, and then simply leave a link at the main TV show article – you're not supposed to do that, and the main cast should still be listed here... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Endorse a split, with only notable characters listed on the separate page. Keeping minor characters without much significance (like the main page does now) verges on fancruft... NickSpark (talk) 00:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade
Lincoln Loud balloon and The Loud House (location) float debut in the annnual Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade®. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B420:9BB9:806B:D08E:D098:3CB8 (talk) 04:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC)