Srich32977 (talk | contribs) →Edits of September 3: add note re WP:AGF |
T3dkjn89q00vl02Cxp1kqs3x7 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
::IMHO these warnings are ill-timed and unwarranted. The particular edits were done 2 days ago. In the meantime, I've engaged the IP user with some dialogue about the need for proper referencing. Of course we don't know which IP editor (if there are more than one) has created the demographic edits complained of, but I do not think they are vandalism -- or warrant v3/4 messages. Please keep [[WP:BITE]] in mind.--[[User:Srich32977|S. Rich]] ([[User talk:Srich32977|talk]]) 03:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Moreover, the edits were not vandalism. Perhaps unsourced, but please [[WP:AGF]].04:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC) |
::IMHO these warnings are ill-timed and unwarranted. The particular edits were done 2 days ago. In the meantime, I've engaged the IP user with some dialogue about the need for proper referencing. Of course we don't know which IP editor (if there are more than one) has created the demographic edits complained of, but I do not think they are vandalism -- or warrant v3/4 messages. Please keep [[WP:BITE]] in mind.--[[User:Srich32977|S. Rich]] ([[User talk:Srich32977|talk]]) 03:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Moreover, the edits were not vandalism. Perhaps unsourced, but please [[WP:AGF]].04:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::Dear Srich, thanks for your comments but I think you're mistaken. [[WP:BITE]] does not apply because this is not a newbie. The IP editor in August/September 2012 is making unsourced edits on the ''same topics'' as in April 2012, demographics and Inland Empire, California. The IP editor has been warned repeatedly on this issue over the past several months. The IP's edits in August were ''highly disruptive''--they added a lot of unsourced information. The IP is also an admitted sockpuppet. In fact, it is worse than that. The IP initially lied and said he wasn't a sock [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FMike_D_26&diff=489971512&oldid=489967997] then he changed his story and admitted he was a sock [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mike_D_26&oldid=490137364]. An admin said this would be a "final warning" for logged out editing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FMike_D_26&diff=490640786&oldid=490137364]. In fact, I'm going to report the user now for violating that final warning. Cheers. [[User:Logical Cowboy|Logical Cowboy]] ([[User talk:Logical Cowboy|talk]]) 05:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:10, 6 September 2012
April 2012
Welcome...
Hello, 71.102.21.238, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I recommend that you get a username by clicking benefits. As a registered user, you gain the use of an appropriate username of your choice, a personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you, the ability to start new pages, and much more. Also, your IP address, 71.102.21.238, will no longer be visible to other users.
. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and has manyPlease sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Gilderien Talk|Contribs 10:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
--Gilderien Talk|Contribs 10:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:28, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Carlsbad, California. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Glenn L (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Merced, California. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Palm Springs, California, you may be blocked from editing. Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mexicans in Spain, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mike D 26 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Transsexualism with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 03:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Passing (sociology). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 03:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Passing (sociology). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 03:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Template:Palm Springs Unified School District does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! None of your edits have explanations or references. Please, read WP guidelines and follow them. It would be especially helpful if you registered as an editor. Thanks. S. Rich (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hello, I'm Srich32977. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Palm Springs Unified School District, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please provide citations -- things like newspaper articles, etc. S. Rich (talk) 02:32, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Edits of September 3
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Demographics of Manhattan, you may be blocked from editing. Logical Cowboy (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Demographics of New York City, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Logical Cowboy (talk) 03:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- IMHO these warnings are ill-timed and unwarranted. The particular edits were done 2 days ago. In the meantime, I've engaged the IP user with some dialogue about the need for proper referencing. Of course we don't know which IP editor (if there are more than one) has created the demographic edits complained of, but I do not think they are vandalism -- or warrant v3/4 messages. Please keep WP:BITE in mind.--S. Rich (talk) 03:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Moreover, the edits were not vandalism. Perhaps unsourced, but please WP:AGF.04:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Dear Srich, thanks for your comments but I think you're mistaken. WP:BITE does not apply because this is not a newbie. The IP editor in August/September 2012 is making unsourced edits on the same topics as in April 2012, demographics and Inland Empire, California. The IP editor has been warned repeatedly on this issue over the past several months. The IP's edits in August were highly disruptive--they added a lot of unsourced information. The IP is also an admitted sockpuppet. In fact, it is worse than that. The IP initially lied and said he wasn't a sock [1] then he changed his story and admitted he was a sock [2]. An admin said this would be a "final warning" for logged out editing [3]. In fact, I'm going to report the user now for violating that final warning. Cheers. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)