Gavia immer (talk | contribs) →Deliveries to User:Example: new section |
→Copyvio: new section |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Hi, I noticed you were testing Signpost delivery on the [[User_talk:Example]] page, which is fine - but I can't tell if that last delivery was a test or an actual automated delivery. That page shouldn't be getting any automated deliveries at all, since it's not an actual active user. I just thought I'd bring it up in case you didn't know about the second delivery. As an incidental point, you may not have noticed that you misspelled "delivery" as "deliverly" in your bot's edit summary - you probably want to fix that. Thanks for reading <span style="white-space:nowrap">— [[User:Gavia immer|Gavia immer]] [[User_talk:Gavia immer|(talk)]]</span> 14:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC) |
Hi, I noticed you were testing Signpost delivery on the [[User_talk:Example]] page, which is fine - but I can't tell if that last delivery was a test or an actual automated delivery. That page shouldn't be getting any automated deliveries at all, since it's not an actual active user. I just thought I'd bring it up in case you didn't know about the second delivery. As an incidental point, you may not have noticed that you misspelled "delivery" as "deliverly" in your bot's edit summary - you probably want to fix that. Thanks for reading <span style="white-space:nowrap">— [[User:Gavia immer|Gavia immer]] [[User_talk:Gavia immer|(talk)]]</span> 14:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Copyvio == |
|||
The message at the top of your talk page was obviously taken from [[User talk:Betacommand]] without any attribution (that I could find). Therefore it is a violation of the [[WP:GFDL|GFDL]]. Please fix this. --'''[[User:Agüeybaná|<font color="Green">Ag</font>]][[User:Agüeybaná/Puerto Rico|<font color="#1E90FF">ü</font>]][[WP:LOVE|<font color="Green">eybaná</font>]]''' 23:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:22, 4 October 2007
If you are here to register a complaint regarding my edits, before doing so please note:
|
Bot Trial
Thanks for giving my bot a trial, I have completed the trial and updated the RFA appropriately. Could you give me aid on how to continue? Many thanks Lloydpick 12:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again, I have completed the 2nd trial now Lloydpick 15:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'd love to, but I can't single handedly approve a bot. CO2 00:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again, I have completed the 2nd trial now Lloydpick 15:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Mzoli's
I dont believe it does, if you check my user page you will see what I think of rascism but for me it is an adequate description. I would more tend to the theory that those who were trying to delete the article did so because it is about a poor, black neighbourhood and they don't believe that can be notable, shame on them. Cheers, SqueakBox 22:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- There are poor neighbourhoods for every race. There are a number of communities that are all-black, or all-white, etc. That's reality. There's nothing racist about that. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Able to send the Signpost?
Are you able to have COBot send the Signpost this week? I'm in the process of shopping for a new computer to remedy the problems I've been having; until then, it'll be tough for me to do so. Ral315 » 00:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll send it. I have a script that I use for other wikis like wikinews and commons to deliver the signpost there. Can I use that script, or should I stick with AWB? CO2 00:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- You can use whatever you want, if you're sure it'll work without problems. I use AWB because it's convenient, not because it's necessarily the best tool. Ral315 » 01:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, cool. Thanks. CO2 01:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- You can use whatever you want, if you're sure it'll work without problems. I use AWB because it's convenient, not because it's necessarily the best tool. Ral315 » 01:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
COBot mistake
See this. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Odd. I've been watching the edits since and haven't seen that again though. One time error, it appears. CO2 02:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- I thought so - just giving you a heads-up. Thanks for looking into it! Videmus Omnia Talk 03:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Media Matters
Thanks for your note; I knew the post I made wouldn't last long. I am simply pleased to have the issue of Sen. Clinton taking responsibily for helping MM come to life actually being discussed (as the other edits/deletions indicate).
--CharliePATpk 14:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
In response to your question, it had no place in that paragraph. That particular paragraph discusses Bill O'Reilly's perceived racist comments, MM's reporting on same, O'Reilly's "I've been quoted out of context" response, MM's response to that, followed by Williams's defense of O'Reilly. Why has Glenn Beck's opinion been jammed into there?-Hal Raglan 02:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Media Matters for America. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --Statsone 01:53, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Done No more reverts. Carbon Monoxide 02:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Deliveries to User:Example
Hi, I noticed you were testing Signpost delivery on the User_talk:Example page, which is fine - but I can't tell if that last delivery was a test or an actual automated delivery. That page shouldn't be getting any automated deliveries at all, since it's not an actual active user. I just thought I'd bring it up in case you didn't know about the second delivery. As an incidental point, you may not have noticed that you misspelled "delivery" as "deliverly" in your bot's edit summary - you probably want to fix that. Thanks for reading — Gavia immer (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Copyvio
The message at the top of your talk page was obviously taken from User talk:Betacommand without any attribution (that I could find). Therefore it is a violation of the GFDL. Please fix this. --Agüeybaná 23:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)