→Your accusation of wikistalking: new section |
Anythingyouwant (talk | contribs) m →Your accusation of wikistalking: wikistalking |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Ferrylodge, your accusation [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMother&diff=158866316&oldid=158782329 here] is way out of line, and unacceptable. You don't [[WP:OWN|own]] [[Mother]] or any other article, nor do you have the market cornered on interest in the subject. Perhaps ''you'' should read the section on Wikistalking that you pointed me to - and then tell me just how I had harassed you or disrupted anything by making one comment on the talk page in support of what I believe to be another editor's correct criticism of a section of the article. And please don't tell me how long that wording has been in the article - that doesn't mean it is right. I think you owe me an apology - but if you think you're right, I suggest you make your accusation in a more formal way, because innuendo is not going to cut it. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 05:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC) |
Ferrylodge, your accusation [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AMother&diff=158866316&oldid=158782329 here] is way out of line, and unacceptable. You don't [[WP:OWN|own]] [[Mother]] or any other article, nor do you have the market cornered on interest in the subject. Perhaps ''you'' should read the section on Wikistalking that you pointed me to - and then tell me just how I had harassed you or disrupted anything by making one comment on the talk page in support of what I believe to be another editor's correct criticism of a section of the article. And please don't tell me how long that wording has been in the article - that doesn't mean it is right. I think you owe me an apology - but if you think you're right, I suggest you make your accusation in a more formal way, because innuendo is not going to cut it. <strong>[[User:Tvoz|Tvoz]] </strong>|<small>[[User talk:Tvoz|talk]]</small> 05:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I am not making accusations. Some users are unaware that it is bad form to follow other users around. If you are following me around (from [[Fred Thompson]] to [[abortion]] to [[mother]]), then I would kindly ask you to please stop. However, if it is merely a bizarre coincidence, then we can leave it at that. If you want to continue this discussion, please do it at the article talk pages. Thanks.[[User:Ferrylodge|Ferrylodge]] 13:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:50, 19 September 2007
Archives
Archive 1: Beginning of Time to 14 March 2007.
Archive 2: 14 March 2007 to 14 May 2007.
Archive 3: 14 May 2007 to 15 June 2007.
Archive 4: 15 June 2007 to 11 September 2007.
Freddie
Thanks for the invite, but I believe you misunderstood what I had said. The wrong version refers to an essay on meta, found at m:The Wrong Version. When there are sides in a debate, you are bound to protect the "wrong version" from one side's perspective. It's a lose, lose situation. No matter what, when a sysop protects a page during a content dispute, it is the "wrong version". My comment was thus referring to this idea, and I was not expressing my opinion that the version was in fact, wrong. But thanks again for bringing it up, and I might just chime in when I get some time.-Andrew c [talk] 04:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Photos
I imagine it has something to do with Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Loads_of_images_.28particularly_flag_images.29_not_showing. There is a bug where some images from commons are not showing, and the developers know about it and are working on it. Hopefully, it will be cleared up soon enough. Hope this helps.-Andrew c [talk] 17:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Just found out purging the image pages over on commons (WP:PURGE) gets them to show (at least on my computer). Not sure if it's necessary to do this though if another solution is already under works.-Andrew c [talk] 17:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Pregnancy
Sorry, our revs got crossed. ... Kenosis 18:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- That talk page history is awfully long for today - Ferrylodge, do you have a dif or preferably several of Photo modifying and/or deleting posts? That's completely unacceptable. Thanks - leave here, I have your page on watch, or leave on my talk page. KillerChihuahua?!? 18:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- He deleted my post here. After I put it back, he changed my section title.Ferrylodge 18:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, renaming the section is acceptable, if not being done in an insulting, disruptive manner - for brevity or clarity or easier navigation. But deleting someone else's posts (except on one's own talk page) is a complete no-no in almost all cases. Your edit was not a blatant personal attack nor was it silly vandalism, which are the usual exceptions. I've left a warning on Photo's talk page. Thanks much for the diff, that history was daunting to look at and I had no idea where to start. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- He deleted my post here. After I put it back, he changed my section title.Ferrylodge 18:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Article in the Washington Post
It was interesting to read about you in the Washington Post this morning. It sounds much like the person I now know to be Ferrylodge. However, you might like to ask them to clarify if you're a man or a woman. As in, the statement currently reads, "and another editor who goes only by Ferrylodge, a Republican and a Thompson supporter. (He recently gave the former Tennessee senator a $100 donation.)... She is, though she's not yet sure who she will support." [1]. Keep up the good work. The Evil Spartan 18:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Why don't we talk about the "health" effects of abortion on the fetus???
???LCP 20:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Your accusation of wikistalking
Ferrylodge, your accusation here is way out of line, and unacceptable. You don't own Mother or any other article, nor do you have the market cornered on interest in the subject. Perhaps you should read the section on Wikistalking that you pointed me to - and then tell me just how I had harassed you or disrupted anything by making one comment on the talk page in support of what I believe to be another editor's correct criticism of a section of the article. And please don't tell me how long that wording has been in the article - that doesn't mean it is right. I think you owe me an apology - but if you think you're right, I suggest you make your accusation in a more formal way, because innuendo is not going to cut it. Tvoz |talk 05:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- I am not making accusations. Some users are unaware that it is bad form to follow other users around. If you are following me around (from Fred Thompson to abortion to mother), then I would kindly ask you to please stop. However, if it is merely a bizarre coincidence, then we can leave it at that. If you want to continue this discussion, please do it at the article talk pages. Thanks.Ferrylodge 13:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)