Reeniereindeer (talk | contribs) →I need some help with people and editing: new section |
|||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
::By the way, congrats on your new burden. <tt>'''<font size="3" style="color:#2E2E2E">[[User:Goodraise|Good]]</font><font size="3" style="color:#2E2E2E">[[User talk:Goodraise|raise]]</font>'''</tt> 06:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
::By the way, congrats on your new burden. <tt>'''<font size="3" style="color:#2E2E2E">[[User:Goodraise|Good]]</font><font size="3" style="color:#2E2E2E">[[User talk:Goodraise|raise]]</font>'''</tt> 06:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Thanks (2×). The page is ready for you know (paste your text where it says "We asked FL nominator and reviewer Goodraise for his favorite:"). Cheers, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 22:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
:::Thanks (2×). The page is ready for you know (paste your text where it says "We asked FL nominator and reviewer Goodraise for his favorite:"). Cheers, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 22:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
== I need some help with people and editing == |
|||
Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble with editing the [[Yumeiro Patissiere|Yumeiro Pâtissière]] page. I was wondering what should I do when an editor and her friends (or possibly the editor herself using different accounts) change the article to what I think is a less Wikipedia-approved version? I have already tried discussing the issue with the main person, but she hasn't replied to me yet. I know I should wait a while, but I have a weird hunch that she has most definitely already at least seen my attempts to discuss the article with her. So, I don't know what to do if she continually ignores me and tries to win at this so-called editing war... In addition, I have discovered that most of the new changes taking place on this anime page are the exact same descriptions that were taken from the [http://yumeiropatissiere.wikia.com/ yumeiropatissierewikia] page. (I'm too lazy to give citations right now but let me know if you want them). |
|||
But, in my opinion as of right now, the article should no longer be B-rated as it is currently. |
|||
So... what should I do when I can't even have a good discussion on what needs to be edited on this article? |
|||
If you are interested in helping me (please), then please look at [[Talk:Yumeiro_Patissiere|this talk page on YP]]. |
|||
Please and thank you!!!!!!!! [[User:Reeniereindeer|Reeniereindeer]] ([[User talk:Reeniereindeer|talk]]) 02:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:08, 2 September 2010
Index
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Chartstats opposes
Hey Goodraise, hope you're well. I did the easy review of Taylor Swift tonight, and your quick and incisive comment blew my comments out pretty much as you don't see Chartstats as meeting WP:RS. Fair enough. This appears to be a reasonably common theme and I was wondering if you could knock up some boilerplate advice (since this crops up quite a bit) so that when you oppose, you could mitigate for all the fallout the oppose generally produces? It'd be awesome if you'd be prepared to just point folks to alternatives or whatever, nothing spectacular, I know it's not your job to do it, but when you just oppose a list based on a single reference source, I imagine for our newcomers it's pretty daunting. Hopefully you see where I'm coming from, if not, no worries, just ignore this and we'll keep on keeping on. All the best, thanks for your efforts here, in particular at FLC. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Better? Goodraise 03:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. With thanks, The Rambling Man (talk) 10:27, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- There may be a more reliable source available; you may want to take a look here. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for informing me. It doesn't change anything though. I already knew about those sources and most of the editors arguing in favor of Chart Stats are aware of them as well. Goodraise 05:21, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- There may be a more reliable source available; you may want to take a look here. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. With thanks, The Rambling Man (talk) 10:27, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Is there a plan to make User:Goodraise/Notability (fiction) an active proposal?
You were working on User:Goodraise/Notability (fiction) a year ago. Is there a plan to make this an active proposal, or can it be removed from that cstegory? Fences&Windows 15:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- No, there is no such plan (at least not on my part). I've removed it from the category. My apologies for inconveniencing you. Goodraise 17:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Not a problem, I'm just tidying things up so we can see which proposals are active. Fences&Windows 21:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c7/Redaktor_Wikipedia_600px.png/130px-Redaktor_Wikipedia_600px.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Romanization for words of English origin
On the MOS:JP talk page, a discussion has been started about including or not including romanizations for words of English origin, such as Fainaru Fantajī in Final Fantasy (ファイナルファンタジー, Fainaru Fantajī) (for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics here).
Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties. One suggestion on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.
One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those selected in the process.
What this invitation is:
- You should give feedback on the first suggested compromise and are highly encouraged to provide other solutions.
What this invitation is not:
- This is not a vote on including or excluding such romanizations.
- This is not a vote on compromises either.
It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the MOS:JP talk page and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. Prime Blue (talk) 11:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Goodraise! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 726 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Barry Yandell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 02:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Signpost "Features and admins" column
Hi Goodraise,
The Signpost's "Features and admins" page now includes a "Choice of the week" for featured articles, featured lists and featured pictures. Each week, The Signpost invites a different delegate, reviewer or nominator from each process to select what they think is the best, or their favourite, item, and to give their reasons. These reasons can be technical (e.g., related to the Criteria) or subjective, or both.
Would you be willing to do this with featured lists for next week's edition? If you agree, promotions from Saturday 21 August to Friday 27 August will be eligible. They will be listed here by Saturday UTC, and we would need your text by Sunday UTC. Examples from previous weeks are accessible by clicking on "← PREVIOUS Features and admins" at the bottom. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:49, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Sure. Goodraise 07:23, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, congrats on your new burden. Goodraise 06:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks (2×). The page is ready for you know (paste your text where it says "We asked FL nominator and reviewer Goodraise for his favorite:"). Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, congrats on your new burden. Goodraise 06:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I need some help with people and editing
Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble with editing the Yumeiro Pâtissière page. I was wondering what should I do when an editor and her friends (or possibly the editor herself using different accounts) change the article to what I think is a less Wikipedia-approved version? I have already tried discussing the issue with the main person, but she hasn't replied to me yet. I know I should wait a while, but I have a weird hunch that she has most definitely already at least seen my attempts to discuss the article with her. So, I don't know what to do if she continually ignores me and tries to win at this so-called editing war... In addition, I have discovered that most of the new changes taking place on this anime page are the exact same descriptions that were taken from the yumeiropatissierewikia page. (I'm too lazy to give citations right now but let me know if you want them).
But, in my opinion as of right now, the article should no longer be B-rated as it is currently.
So... what should I do when I can't even have a good discussion on what needs to be edited on this article?
If you are interested in helping me (please), then please look at this talk page on YP.
Please and thank you!!!!!!!! Reeniereindeer (talk) 02:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)