→You call this a free encyclopedia, Kuru ?: new section |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
Dear colleague administrator-- with respect to the admittedly unsatisfactory article on Nefertiti- Ancient Beauty, Contemporary Leader" , which you deleted as "An article already exists on this subject under the correct name; the content is obviously copied form another source, likely a copyright violation; this article is beyond salvage." -- which speedy criterion on WP:CSD exactly does this explanation refer to ? '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 20:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
Dear colleague administrator-- with respect to the admittedly unsatisfactory article on Nefertiti- Ancient Beauty, Contemporary Leader" , which you deleted as "An article already exists on this subject under the correct name; the content is obviously copied form another source, likely a copyright violation; this article is beyond salvage." -- which speedy criterion on WP:CSD exactly does this explanation refer to ? '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 20:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:To be honest, I misread the tag in my haste and presumed it was the verified variety of copyvio. Thank you for cleaning up the situation, and my apologies. [[User:Kuru|<font color = "#cd853f">'''Kuru'''</font>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<font color = "#f5deb3"><sup>''talk''</sup></font>]] 21:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
:To be honest, I misread the tag in my haste and presumed it was the verified variety of copyvio. Thank you for cleaning up the situation, and my apologies. [[User:Kuru|<font color = "#cd853f">'''Kuru'''</font>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<font color = "#f5deb3"><sup>''talk''</sup></font>]] 21:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
== This historic fact is not allowed on the main pages of http://en.wikipedia.org/ == |
|||
'''Ustaše''' (Uprisers) - nickname for Croatian soldiers that drove out the Turks from Croatia in the years from 1683 to 1689. <ref>Radoslav Lopašić - DVA HRVATSKA JUNAKA: Marko Mesić i Luka Ibrišimović (Zagreb 1888) p 35.</ref> former [[Uskoks]]. |
|||
Commanders of the southern soldiers based in Dalmatia (1683) where Prince Franjo Posedarski, Prince Jerko Rukavina, Dujan Kovačević, Ilija Smiljanić, Šimun Bartolac and Stojan Janković (former muslim) |
|||
Commanders of the northern soldiers based in Ogulin (1685) where Baron Franjo Oršić, Baron Stjepan Vojnović, Baron Ivan Gusić and Count Adam Purgstall.<ref>Dragutin Hirca - LIKA I PLITVIČKA JEZERA (Zagreb 1900) p 66.</ref> |
|||
The Ustasa army numbered several thousand soldiers that later settled with there families in the Lika and Krbava region of Croatia and are all found by name age and rank in the Census of Lika and Krbava in 1712.<ref>Karl Kaser - POPIS LIKE I KRBAVE 1712. GODINE (Zagreb 2003) p 51-374</ref> |
|||
1. Radoslav Lopašić - DVA HRVATSKA JUNAKA: Marko Mesić i Luka Ibrišimović (Zagreb 1888) p 35. |
|||
2. Dragutin Hirca - LIKA I PLITVIČKA JEZERA (Zagreb 1900) p 66 |
|||
3. Karl Kaser - POPIS LIKE I KRBAVE 1712. GODINE (Zagreb 2003) p 51-374 |
|||
'''I am constantly deleted and blocked from editing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ustase by,''' |
|||
'''1. User: [[User:Spylab|Spylab]] |
|||
'''2. User: Rjecina''' |
|||
'''3. User: [[User:Kirker|Kirker]]''' |
|||
'''4. User: Kuru''' |
|||
'''5. User:''' [[User:Laughing Man|laughing man]] '''WikiProject Serbia.''' |
|||
'''6. User: Steel359''' |
|||
'''This is NO free Encyclopedia !''' |
|||
== Warning == |
|||
'''If I am not unblocked from editing this article within the next 24 hours.''' |
|||
'''This above entire message about http://en.wikipedia.org and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ustase''' |
|||
'''Will be posted in one hundred forums all over the world''' |
|||
'''Example >''' http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=1120986#1120986 |
|||
'''This will automatically be picked up by the search engines in the coming ten years''' |
|||
'''Enuf is Enuf !''' |
|||
--[[User:Brkic|Brkic]] 08:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== You call this a free encyclopedia, Kuru ? == |
|||
You are allowed to write about the Spanish Governor's Palace 1722 in http://en.wikipedia.org/ |
|||
I am not allowed to write about the Croatian "guvernadur" Prince Frane Posedarski 1658 in http://en.wikipedia.org/ |
|||
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=10&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=%22guvernadur%22+knez+Frane+Posedarski+&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images |
Revision as of 10:05, 1 October 2007
Kuru's Talk Page | ||
|
Vandalism of Build-Operate-Transfer
Why the hell did I receive a message that I vandalized it? While in fact, all that I added into it are truth. Philippines is really part of the program Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) and I just added it to its right place.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.105.139.62 (talk • contribs).
- The edit I reverted and warned you for was blanking the entire article and replacing it with "OWNED". You can see the diff here. Kuru talk 05:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh.. Sorry for that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.105.136.181 (talk • contribs).
User:Aatomic1
This editor that you blocked last night is using sockpuppets to evade their block and edit war. Please see the history of Birmingham pub bombings. Kind regards. 217.44.10.252 12:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Seems there are new editors doing exactly what this editor was blocked for could you have a look dont want to get in to an edit war with these new editors thanks. BigDunc 12:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
There has been eleven changes made here[[1]] since this morning they are trying to get it blocked with the names of the dead included against consensus.BigDunc 13:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies - I am unable to react to this during the day; checking now. Kuru talk 02:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- It would appear the article is now semi-protected, which will prevent him from using socks to continue to edit war for now. If he ages a few accounts and starts reverting with them, or if he immediately returns from his block and starts the same activity, please let me know. For now I've added Birmingham pub bombings to my watchlist. Kuru talk 02:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Prince2 and the anonymous spammer
Hi there Kuru, I saw the excellent work that you did on trying to remove the spam links from the external links section of the Prince2 article. I have tried to resurrect this effort and I have put the page out to RFC. Unfortunately only one user has commented and it is undoubtedly the anonymous spammer. Obviously there is no point doing an RFC if the anonymous spammer can post whatever anonymous comments he wants. You seem to be a far more experienced wikipedian than myself and was wondering if you had any ideas what to do? Wikikob 13:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry that Wikikob finds it necessary to trouble you Kuru, but I cannot allow his abuse to pass without comment.
- I am apparently "the anonymous spammer". A disgraceful allegation of course, name calling simply because I dared to disagree with him. In fact my comments following his were my first ever and I have no affiliation with any commercial entity in this field at all.
- Contrary to his comments there are clearly a number of contributors supporting retention of those links, such as Stevo, PRINCEAndy and others. You probably recall this fact.
- I would also draw your attention to this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk.
- Statements he made on there like "I am determined not to let him beat me" are of concern as they illustrate a mission other than to contribute to the quality of the page. The (short) edit history of Wikikob comprises almost entirely of deletions and no content input. This is not wrong in itself, but it is not usual for someone to engage in such a determined campaign with such a background.
- Doesn't this strike you as strange? Well it did me, which is why I took a look and have taken the trouble to counter him. I find it hard to believe that a casual observer would register and behave like this straight off the bat. It does not make sense. It seems to me that he does have some other mission.
Kuru, I am getting fed up with this anonymous user who keeps following me around and I hardly feel its worth bothering you with this but I have to counter assertions such as "the edit history of Wikikob comprises almost entirely of deletions and no content input" and that I am a recently registered user. The truth is that I registered as a user in October 2004 and have made substantial contributions to the Prince2 article. This is my first experience with a wikipedia troll and it just makes me wonder why wikipedia allows anonymous users to contribute. Why not ask everyone to register? Oh well, all part of my learning experience. Anyway, thanks for your input. Wikikob 08:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ignore it. You're a professional and should have a thicker skin by now... :) As to anonymous edits; you might be stunned at how much of the encyclopedia is built through IP addresses. I've spent a lot of time on recent changes patrol, and the ratio of good edits to overt vandalism is about 10 to 1, with some of the edits being major. Yes, it's annoying to track down a persistent vandal with a rotating IP, but I'm happy to take the time out to do it if it saves the anonymous edit ability of the other 9 editors. :) Kuru talk 00:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Tim Duncan
Hi there, as the Tim Duncan article is now undergoing FAC, and I've noticed you do edit the article from time to time, I was wondering what are your thoughts regarding the state/quality of the article? Thanks. Chensiyuan 02:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- It looks spectacular; I actually read through a good portion of it last night. Y'all are doing your normal great job on the NBA articles; it's nice to see the Spurs get some development. Kuru talk 15:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Our pleasure! Chensiyuan 16:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Tutorial
Kuru, I think the Wikipedia tutorial needs to be fixed to explain how to cite references, but I'm not sure how to fix it. Can you help? --Foggy Morning 03:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Interesting; I've never played around with the tutorial pages there before. Using the php style ref tags might be a little confusing for new users, though. They should probably be mentioned somewhere in there so that people at least know what they are when they see the code. Maybe a pointer to the mediawiki help page on them? Kuru talk 03:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- The Mediawiki help page is pretty techy-babble -- I guess I say that because I don't understand it! :-) But I've picked up the drift about how <ref></ref> and {{Reflist}} and <references/> work to link citations to text in Wikipedia. That's not very complicated. And citation templates aren't too complicated once you get used to them, working on a basic level. (For me, not 100% correct, but I try to get the main info in place.)
- Some experienced Wikipedia editors think that references are quotes, believe it or not. I checked the definitions in Financial ratio against a book I have and cited the source I used, and User:pgreenfinch thought I was creating a "quotefarm". I was just trying to give a source for the information I could confirm, and tag the other information as uncomfirmed or unsourced. Another experienced Wikipedia editor, User:gregalton seemed to support citing a reference for article text, but he doesn't usually cite references for his additions to Wikipedia. So I think that editors don't know how to do this, even experienced editors.
- I don't think it's too complicated to replace the Wikipedia Tutorial explanation about External Links with an explanation about how to use ref tags and reflists to cite sources for text in Wikipedia. But I don't know how to edit the tutorial pages.
- If there are some Wikipedia politics involved with this issue, I'm sorry if I'm rocking the boat. --Foggy Morning 02:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Aatomic1
Could you please have a look at this, [2]. Despite this [3] and an ongoing mediation, this editor continues with edit warring. [4] [5] [6]. Thanks --Domer48 22:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- That's amazing. I've protected the page for now pending the conclusion of your mediation. Other comments on the article's talk page. Kuru talk 00:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Protection
Thank you for protecting Birmingham pub bombings, while I work on getting consensus. Dreamy \*/!$! 14:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you created this picture. Would it be possible for you to give it a bit more contrast, the blue is very light and difficult to see. --213.155.231.26 17:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC) (too lazy to login for this simple message, greetings anyway)
- Thanks for the feedback. Yes, the text is pretty crappy - I'll try to fire up the mapping material next time I get some time off. Kuru talk 02:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Hardouin reported by User:ThePromenader (Result: no violation)
Can I ask you to reconsider your decision? The contributor in question is gaming the system to the extreme, and WP:MEAT is akin to WP:SOCK in Wikipedia's books. I left an additional comment on the 3RR page article.
There wouldn't be a problem if the above contributor was promoting verifiable fact, but instead is agressively promoting a personal "theory" agenda in reverting the same. I have done much to get mediation in this, but in the meantime User:Hardouin is doing all he can to profit from the low traffic/level of knowledge of most English wiki contributors in these articles to promote personal agenda over fact. The facts are readily available (and even obvious), if you have the time to read the relevent talk page - in looking at this perhaps this user's agenda will be clearer: reverting to the same unverifiable terminology again and again on the same articles, and this for more than two years now - and yesterday's reverts were just more of the same. Cheers. THEPROMENADER 06:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Promenader's aggressive behavior and accusations
Hi Kuru. Just discovered Promenader's accusations today. This is not the first time this happens. This must be the 7th or 8th time this user accuses someone of being my sock-puppet and files 3RR complaints against me. Whenever someone agrees with me and disagrees with him, then it must necessarily be my sock-puppet! He even asked some admin to check if their was sock-puppetry once, but of course the admin couldn't find any sock-puppetry, yet this hasn't stopped Promenader from renewing accusations as you can see. I wonder if you know a way I could report Promenader's behavior. His harassment is reaching extremes. Whenever I edit Wikipedia he reverts my edits within hours with complete disregard for civility and Wikilove, then go on making accusations and starts fights. It has lasted for almost two years now. Two years of harassment! I have told admins before, but nobody has really inquired on Promenader's behavior so far. Do you know any admin that could check this? If you're interested I can give you a list of editors who have witnessed Promenader's behavior in the past two years and who will happily tell you about his behavior. Hardouin 09:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- You'll notice that everything in the above is but an insinuative attempt at character assasination, and that nothing in the above concerns anything about disputed fact. I'm sorry that I am so insistant in my efforts to see that the concerned articles (those concerning Paris, as far as I'm concerned - and no further) remain verifiable, but the fact of the matter is very simple and accessible to all. As for my behaviour, I have never resorted to sock-puppetry (as User:Hardouin has), nor sought the aid of those not knowledgable in the subjects I am dealing to "back" my edits, nor partaken in behind-the-scenes e-mail campaigns to garner the favour of (France-ignorant) admins and contributors. As for civility: one can only maintain WP:FAITH for so long; User:Hardouin and I live in the same region, and I (as well as he) know that he is fully aware of the fact of what he writes, and this (hi)story has been going on for more than two years now for everything concerning low-traffic Paris articles. ~~~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThePromenader (talk • contribs) 14:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC) - sorry, was working from a shift-jis-only IBM computer. THEPROMENADER 23:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Dsol has been shopping his complaint around for a long time now, including with User:SlimVirgin and User:Brighterorange and nobody has yet taken him up on his proposal that the eXile article should include phrases about a named well known celebrity having 2 vaginas and a named well known reporter having a horse sperm creme pie shoved in his face. Please see SlimVirgin's removal of this tabloid information [8]
Please remember that WP:BLP states that Wikipedia is not a tabloid, and that biographical info for LPs must be stated conservatively. Dsol might object that it is all quoted by reliable sources: a) not true, b) irrelevant,
a) the couple of sources he's managed to dig up are just saying that the eXile said "..." Quite a difference. They also say things like (approx) "The eXile visciously attacks innocent people and goes well beyond the bounds of decency." Without the qualifiers, the article is simply misleading.
b) irrelevant. The info as presented is still direct from a tabloid, still not conservatively presented, still misleading, and not needed in the article. On it's face it is completely against WP:BLP. Nobody at WP:BLPN will support him so he shops it elsewhere. Do please look at his claimed support by User:The Evil Spartan, and please be aware that he will misquote you too.
In short, I can't see anything to discuss with Dsol, he wants to include garbage in a Wikipedia article, and I'll revert it. If you want to decide this matter, I'll ask that you look closely at the article and what Dsol wants in there very carefully. Also please look at what other administrators have done.
Thanks in advance for your carefulness.
24.127.156.41 00:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I won't extensively argue with this anon's comments here because I've already adressed them at the BLP noticeboard page, and since it's better to keep discussion centralized anyway. I would only repeat that the 4 sources I cited are not merely repeating the eXile's claims, and do assert the incident as fact, e.g. the salon inteviewer also reported personally seeing photos of the incident, and one source even claimed to have fact-checked it with the NYT by phone. I think this anon's behavior goes well beyond requesting reliable sources into wilful censorship. I would encourage you to read the links if you have any doubts, and if possible explain to this anon that s/he should assume good faith, as at this point s/he "no longer sees" anything to discuss with me. Dsol 01:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I fully agree with SV's actions as the material was presented at the time; the sources sucked and the allegations were presented as fact. Both the material, and the sources have changed since then. Honestly, we could probably do without the salacious details, but that's something you two should continue to discuss. You both seem like intelligent adults capable of finding some language that both illustrates the events and does so responsibly. Please continue the discussion at the BLP noticeboard before blindly reverting the material. Kuru talk 02:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Birmingham Pub Bombings
Some Dumbot has unprotected Birmingham Pub Bombings Aatomic1 12:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[9]
Hi Kuru. I noticed that you hardblocked this user for having an inappropriete username, but that you used the {{Usernameblocked}}, instead of the {{Usernamehardblocked}} on their talk page. That's perfectly fine, but I think for hardblocking inappropriete usernames, the message would have been more clear with the other template. No worries, though.--U.S.A. ( contribs) 17:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right - I hit the wrong button... :) Should be fixed now. Kuru talk 17:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Blocked JBHSBandGeek
Thank you for addressing my problem. I actually do not remember posting anything about Disney. It's possible that someone logged on using my screen name. I'll change my password so that no one can edit anything under my name again. Thanks! (JBHSBandGeek 18:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC))
re 172.129.240.83 block
Thanks for your message at my talkpage. I have requested 172.129.240.83 clarify their reason for unblock on their talkpage. I don't see any point in lifting a block just so they can test how far they can push before getting muzzled again, but I don't mind a "goodwill" reduction in tariff if they make a reasonable case.
I am commenting here because it is late in the UK and I may well go offline before any response from the editor. If you are still online please feel free to amend the tariff as you see fit. Cheers. LessHeard vanU 00:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- I have unblocked, on the basis that a vandal hopefully reformed now is better than a revenging vandal in two days time. I'm off to bed forthwith, so I will request you supply the banhammer if they do go back to old practices. LessHeard vanU 00:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Understood - I'll check in on him from time to time. Kuru talk 00:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Range blocks
Hi, I have my own Wiki, how do I perform a range block?
If you're curious why: [10] Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 02:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not sure, I've yet to have to pull that trigger. You can find the mediawiki instructions on it here, though. Hope that helps... Kuru talk 02:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Galileo Wiki
The facts concerning Galileo are exactly as I stated them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.4.216.68 (talk) 06:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- You mean where you changed his name to "brandon casey" a year and a half ago? Sure, sparky. Kuru talk 13:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
RE: Block of CNNfanDotCom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
I released the autoblock myself, but thanks for the note! —[[Animum | talk]] 22:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For beating me to a whole heck of a lot of reverts. Cheers! ;) Into The Fray T/C 22:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC) |
- Thanks! I think I stepped on your warnings a few times - sorry! :) Kuru talk 02:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Conan the Cimmerian
Hello! Please see my latest entry at the Conan the Barbarian discussion page. PointDread 20:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Noted, I've replied there. If no one starts up in a few weeks, let's make the move. Kuru talk 00:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Outsourcing
Re: your deletion of my edit. I think an article on outsourcing should mention online outsourcing, including examples (as with the examples of traditional outsourcing companies, wich I deleted as I fail to see how they add to the article). It's a very rapidly growing area. I listed several and am researching others. I actually think online outsourcing deserves its own entry, particularly with regards to the area of social responsibility - in that it gives people in developing nations the opportunity to earn income performing useful services for people in the developed world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinm5 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- A big spammy list of commercial external links combined with some uncited puffery about online outsourcing is not a constructive addition to the article. Concur with the removal of the list of 'example vendors' - I think I've made the same edit in the past. Kuru talk 03:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Your Blocking of My Editing of Indonesia
Hello, Kuru. Your action is unfortunate, unwarranted, unnecessary, and unkind. Apparently you fell into the trap of some so-called 'editors' here.
I am well-aware of the etiquette required when contributing to Wikipedia, a PUBLIC forum where no registered user or group of users has editorial authority. However, some here (including yourself) do not honor the spirit of this forum but regularly violate it while falsely accusing sincere contributors of violations; I can see you are either one of the false accusers or simply someone who allowed himself to be carried away by a mob mentality instead of exercising character and examining what really happened. This is all I have to say to you. (wikimuppy) Wikipuppy 17:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- You've been pointed in the direction of the WP:3RR policy roughly half a dozen times now. I could not honestly care less about your rather simple content dispute. Kuru talk 18:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
why did you delete my new entry before I even finished it? that's not cool.
I am writing a page about traffic shortcuts - a necessary part of our 21st century auto-centered lives. My intent is to add other tools and links for people to use to help themselves (www.mytrafficshortcuts.com / www.trafficdocumentary.com / www.sigalert.com)
Is this not allowed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Traffique (talk • contribs) 20:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, you're essentially creating a promotional article for your non-notable commercial web site. Please stop. Kuru talk 20:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy
Dear colleague administrator-- with respect to the admittedly unsatisfactory article on Nefertiti- Ancient Beauty, Contemporary Leader" , which you deleted as "An article already exists on this subject under the correct name; the content is obviously copied form another source, likely a copyright violation; this article is beyond salvage." -- which speedy criterion on WP:CSD exactly does this explanation refer to ? DGG (talk) 20:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- To be honest, I misread the tag in my haste and presumed it was the verified variety of copyvio. Thank you for cleaning up the situation, and my apologies. Kuru talk 21:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
This historic fact is not allowed on the main pages of http://en.wikipedia.org/
Ustaše (Uprisers) - nickname for Croatian soldiers that drove out the Turks from Croatia in the years from 1683 to 1689. [1] former Uskoks. Commanders of the southern soldiers based in Dalmatia (1683) where Prince Franjo Posedarski, Prince Jerko Rukavina, Dujan Kovačević, Ilija Smiljanić, Šimun Bartolac and Stojan Janković (former muslim) Commanders of the northern soldiers based in Ogulin (1685) where Baron Franjo Oršić, Baron Stjepan Vojnović, Baron Ivan Gusić and Count Adam Purgstall.[2] The Ustasa army numbered several thousand soldiers that later settled with there families in the Lika and Krbava region of Croatia and are all found by name age and rank in the Census of Lika and Krbava in 1712.[3]
1. Radoslav Lopašić - DVA HRVATSKA JUNAKA: Marko Mesić i Luka Ibrišimović (Zagreb 1888) p 35.
2. Dragutin Hirca - LIKA I PLITVIČKA JEZERA (Zagreb 1900) p 66
3. Karl Kaser - POPIS LIKE I KRBAVE 1712. GODINE (Zagreb 2003) p 51-374
I am constantly deleted and blocked from editing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ustase by,
1. User: Spylab
2. User: Rjecina
3. User: Kirker
4. User: Kuru
5. User: laughing man WikiProject Serbia.
6. User: Steel359
This is NO free Encyclopedia !
Warning
If I am not unblocked from editing this article within the next 24 hours.
This above entire message about http://en.wikipedia.org and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ustase
Will be posted in one hundred forums all over the world
Example > http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?p=1120986#1120986
This will automatically be picked up by the search engines in the coming ten years
Enuf is Enuf !
--Brkic 08:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
You call this a free encyclopedia, Kuru ?
You are allowed to write about the Spanish Governor's Palace 1722 in http://en.wikipedia.org/
I am not allowed to write about the Croatian "guvernadur" Prince Frane Posedarski 1658 in http://en.wikipedia.org/