Cdogsimmons (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Reverted edits by Cdogsimmons (talk) to last version by Ralbot |
||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. [[User:Ralbot|Ralbot]] ([[User talk:Ralbot|talk]]) 08:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small> |
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. [[User:Ralbot|Ralbot]] ([[User talk:Ralbot|talk]]) 08:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</small> |
||
==Deletion review of Category:Wikipedians who support Hezbollah== |
|||
Hi. I noticed you took part in the debate at[[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Hezbollah userbox]] and I was wondering if you might want to participate in a debate I have started at deletion review of this category and accompanying userboxes [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 February 28|here]].--[[User:Cdogsimmons|Cdogsimmons]] ([[User talk:Cdogsimmons|talk]]) 02:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:37, 28 February 2008
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
re Mantanmoreland ArbCom
Hi. I have noted your comments restricting M to one account, and various sanctions. I wonder if you have considered extending your wordings to encompass editing under ip addresses, and the effect on the sanctions applied to the remaining account? My work in the workshop on my own proposals is a little stale - otherwise I would add it myself - but your section is still active so I thought I would suggest it to you. Cheers. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
In light of continued disputes, remedy 4 adopted in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic is amended by adding:
- "Additionally, any uninvolved administrator may impose a reasonable editing restriction (for example, 1RR) or page ban upon any editor who repeatedly engages in disruptive or uncivil editing of Free Republic or any closely related page. Prior to imposing such a ban or restriction, a warning should be given on the affected user's talkpage. All bans and restrictions shall be logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic#Log of blocks and bans."
- All editors, particularly including single purpose accounts and editors who have or may reasonably be perceived as having a conflict of interest, are strongly urged to edit Free Republic and related articles only in conformity with all Wikipedia policies and with this committee's prior decision. If the enhanced administrator authority provided in this ruling does not improve the situation on this article after 30 days, a request for a more formal Arbitration Committee review may be submitted.
For the Arbitration committee, Thatcher 16:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
WP:AIV
Hey, could you pop by AIV again, and, take another look at the report you made, please? SQLQuery me! 17:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
FYI - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- See above cmt. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk
Just saw and replied. Weird. Lawrence § t/e 17:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Your note
Can you show me which edit I did while the page was protected (besides the self reversion)? Crum375 (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- On the history:[1]
- (cur) (last) 20:49, 22 February 2008 Crum375 (Talk | contribs) m (142,822 bytes) (restore pp notice)
- (cur) (last) 20:47, 22 February 2008 Crum375 (Talk | contribs) (142,782 bytes) (Rvt - missed Alison's protection - but BLP should be removed anyway (by someone else))
- (cur) (last) 20:45, 22 February 2008 Crum375 (Talk | contribs) (142,798 bytes) (→Editors/admins here have been "drawn offsides" by WB before: another BLP redaction)
- (cur) (last) 20:44, 22 February 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) (142,822 bytes) ({{pp-dispute}})
- (cur) (last) 20:44, 22 February 2008 Crum375 (Talk | contribs) (142,782 bytes) (→External stalking: redacted BLP violation)
- (cur) (last) 20:44, 22 February 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) m (Protected Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Evidence: This is ridicuous [edit=sysop:move=sysop] (expires 22:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)))
- (cur) (last) 20:40, 22 February 2008 Lawrence Cohen (Talk | contribs) (142,878 bytes) (→External stalking: rvt Crum375 - stop it)
Bold is her protection, Reds are your disallowed edits. You need to go back to the last pre-pp version, this one. You probably just missed it off timing. Lawrence § t/e 20:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- I think I got them all now. Thanks for letting me know. Crum375 (talk) 21:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Request for mediation not accepted
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
ANI/Elias
It's just the user's whole tone - both anchored links took me straight to where Elias was quoting policy, and linking to Stormfront of all sites seems like a troll's move. Will (talk) 00:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Probably, maybe. Eliaslucard's commentary about his beliefs however isn't helpful to building an encyclopedia, however, and his screeds about how (from a glance) everyone from the Jews to the Martians are anti-Christian are just going to lead people to respond nastily. Why even post material like that? Lawrence § t/e 00:15, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, without diffs, I personally wouldn't drudge through 80kb of troll fighting. Personally, looking at it with a proper glance (more than flicking my eyes at it), it looks like six of one, but at least Elias is trying to restrain himself with his civility. Will (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- True enough, on that. I simply wish people didn't feel the need to expound on their personal beliefs in that way--it's only common sense that this sort of thing is just going to set folks off. Lawrence § t/e 00:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's not simply a matter of "personal beliefs" on a talk page (which is already proscribed per WP talk page policies).It's a matter of using a talk page for anti-Semitic rants, and Jew-baiting of other editors (i.e., me). Is this tolerated on wikipedia? Can I make racist rants against other groups (non-Jews) and have people simply point out how Boodlesthecat "is trying to restrain himself with his civility" and have editors, in response to my racist rants, "wish people didn't feel the need to expound on their personal beliefs." If an editor complained on ANI about my racist rants, would that editor be told to "shut the hell up" like Will told me? Is that the extent of how Wikipedia responds to overt anti-Semitism and Jew-baiting of editors on Talk Pages? tell someone who protests it to "shut the hell up?" I am finding this exceedingly disturbing. Boodlesthecat (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- True enough, on that. I simply wish people didn't feel the need to expound on their personal beliefs in that way--it's only common sense that this sort of thing is just going to set folks off. Lawrence § t/e 00:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, without diffs, I personally wouldn't drudge through 80kb of troll fighting. Personally, looking at it with a proper glance (more than flicking my eyes at it), it looks like six of one, but at least Elias is trying to restrain himself with his civility. Will (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Your note 2
Hi Lawrence, thanks for your message. It's very much appreciated. Crum375 (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Email please?
Hello, Lawrence. If you're able, please email me: palabrazo@gmail.com Thanks! --WordMail (talk) 17:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)