Doug Weller (talk | contribs) You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits on Armenian language. (TW) |
Doug Weller (talk | contribs) →March 2014: clarify editing restrictions |
||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[Image:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=]]To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''one week'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 06:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Reversal of enforcement actions|procedure prohibiting administrators]] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[Image:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=]]To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision, you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''one week'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 06:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Reversal of enforcement actions|procedure prohibiting administrators]] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> |
||
You are already under Arbitration sanctions as of your 2013 warning above. To clarify: |
|||
[[File:Yellow traffic warning.png|left|20px]] '''Notice:''' Under the terms of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2]], any editor who edits articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility may be placed under several editing restrictions, by notice on that editor's talk page. This notice is to inform you that based on your edits, you are hereby placed under the following restrictions: |
|||
#'''Revert limitation''' (formerly known as revert parole). You are limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism, and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. |
|||
#'''Supervised editing''' (formerly known as probation). You may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should you fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in your interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise. |
|||
#'''Civility supervision''' (formerly known as civility parole). If you make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then you may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat transgressions. |
|||
'''Enforcement:''' Violations of limitations, supervision, or bans imposed by the remedies in this case may be enforced by brief blocks of up to a week in the event of repeat violations. After 5 blocks the maximum block period shall increase to one year. |
|||
You were warned last June and the log is at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2]]. Note - '''one revert per page per week'' and ''discuss any content reversions''. See [[WP:VANDALISM]] also as if you revert for something that isn't vandalism, no matter what you think it is, that's your one per week. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 07:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
This notice is being given to you due to your involvement in an [[WP:EW|edit war]] in the affected area. If you disagree with another editor, please engage in calm discussion and seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] rather than repeatedly making the same edits. Edit warring behavior will lead to sanctions. |
Revision as of 07:00, 23 March 2014
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Pointy AFD nomination of Western Azerbaijan regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Western Azerbaijan. Thank you. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 08:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC) xeris aper
Nagorno-Karabakh Autnomous Oblast
Hello, I had edited a part of this article which said " Had Turkey not been an issue, Stalin would probably have left Karabakh under Armenian control" which was referenced to Robert Service (2006). I deleted this sentence as it does not show any justification or proof for such a strong statement, and furthermore delievers no political motive for this opinion. Alone the word "probably" is a clear indicator that such a statement should not appear on Wikipedia, and whoever the author of this sentence is shows clearly a non-neutral position to this topic. As Wikipedia is supposed to not get involved into any political debates and take sides, I demand this sentence to be removed as it shows severe political incorrectness. Afterall, only Stalin alone can say what he probably would have done under different circumstances. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.198.91 (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- It has already been discussed in the talk page, the line stays. Ninetoyadome (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Guba Mass grave
Your actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account in Guba mass grave as you are not allowed to put one sided information and therefore let this to be warning. You have already have track of vandalism like in here in here, by adding president over athlete's name http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan_at_the_2008_Summer_Olympics&diff=prev&oldid=230913536
In the second attempt, admins will ban you for this type of actions.--NovaSkola 16:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.
Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive772
Please do not add comments to archived discussions. I have reverted your edits to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive772. If you need to, please start a new discussion. Regards, GiantSnowman 08:04, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- FYI - I have blocked Vardan Zavenich (talk · contribs); a full list of suspected sockpuppets can be found at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of KunoxTxa - please let me know if you find any more. GiantSnowman 08:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Firstly you should tag the user page, not the talk oage. Secondly a block and a ban are two different things. Thirdly, no, tagging doesn't result in a block - try AIV or SPI. I have now blocked Qajik. Regards, GiantSnowman 17:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
You have to specify on the talk page the POV problems you see. Otherwise, the notice will be removed. --Golbez (talk) 19:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Justice for Khojaly
You have to specify on the talk page the POV and Refimprove problems you see (this was already explained to you above by other user). Therefore your notice has just been removed from the article Justice for Khojaly. Best, 195.212.29.185 (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Reply
Let us see first if the necessary changes will be made. We can go from there. Proudbolsahye (talk) 00:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Edit war on Ben Yagan
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Ben Yagan.
While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.
If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.
If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.
Continued edit warring on Ben Yagan or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 12:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Please notice the vanalism of 75.37.64.38 on other pages. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 12:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Soghomon Tehlirian
Hi,
You have removed the section below I have entered to Soghomon Tehlirian which is a fact, and reference was made to armenews.com
Could you please state on what basis you have decided to remove this ?
even though his release by German court on murder of Talat Pasha based on his insanity. [1]
Malizengin (talk) 03:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Why would that part even be significant? Ninetoyadome (talk) 03:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
You are right to remove it from there as it sounds bit offensive in complete sentence. But in general, this information is important on summary of the article where it relays all the information in summary, leading events and results etc. Thanks, Malizengin (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC) You removed another edit there, mentioning it is mentioned in trial section, everything there in summary is mentioned later in details. But summary is where all important aspects of the article should be outlined. It is mentioned there court released him. But court released him on insanity and not on basis court didn't find him innocent. Don't you agree ? Please before removing and we spend time discuss. I am being constructive while you are not showing same positive attitude, thanks, Malizengin (talk) 07:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Armenian Genocide
You have reverted below sections without any basis,
{ Austin Henry Layard's confidential report which was sent on 25th March 1878 with reference number of 401, states.... }
- A book written by same person might say Armenians massacred. But the section I entered is about living conditions of Armenians in 1878. Section I entered is official British document, all reference number and date and reference is given. So it is correct therefore I appreciate either you give reasonable and logical reason for removing or please undo,
Another part you have removed is
{Report of Charles Blunt, British Consul to Ottoman Empire gives more light to life of Armenians under Ottoman Rule, the report is dated 1860, .....}
- Please explain why you have removed this part ? it is again official British documents. You may like or not what is written there, but document is a document and it is relevant to topic and will be helpful making research on the subject.
Either please give the reasons -not subjective but objective- and if you don't have reasons please undo to prevent edit war and further claims.
- Post the "confidential" report. I can't find this report online, somehow the author is the only one who has it? Countless eyewitness reports state Armenians were treated as second class citizens. Ninetoyadome (talk) 07:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
it is from a book with ISBN 975-16-0139-8 and page numbers are indicated. You don't find it online doesn't mean it is not real. You should pay and buy books. This article has lots of references to webpages which can be written by anybody. This is a book prepared based on real documents with all reference numbers to original documents. You may consult to UK archives or http://kohatest.univ-aix-marseille.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=335674 for the book. If you don't have any more reasons, could you please undo you revert of changes ?Malizengin (talk) 07:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
insane accusations of insanity
I could care less if Soghomon Tehlirian was excused on the grounds that he was insane. But no where in his trial record does it say he was deemed innocent on the grounds of insanity:
I avow with honor and clear conscience to the verdict of the jury:
“Is the defendant, Soghomon Tehlirian, guilty of having intentionally
killed a man, Talaat Pasha, on March 15, 1921, in Charlottenburg?”
Signed: Otto Reinecke, Foreman of the jury.
(There is a great deal of commotion and applause in the courtroom)
PRESIDING JUSTICE — I now sign the verdict and I ask the clerk to do
the same and read the verdict out loud.
(The secretary reads the verdict and it is translated for the defendant)
PRESIDING JUSTICE — Therefore, the following sentence is issued:
“The defendant is acquitted at the expense of the state treasury.
(Renewed commotion and applause) In accordance with the decision of
the jury, the defendant is not guilty of the punishable act with which he
has been charged.”
Then the following decision is announced:
“The order of imprisonment as regards the defendant is hereby annulled.”
(The defendant is congratulated by his defense attorneys, his com-patriots, and the pub/k in attendance.)
Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement warning: WP:ARBAA2
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
This warning is for edit-warring and non-neutral editing, as discussed in response to a recent arbitration enforcement request. Sandstein 06:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
AE report
He's already topic banned for six months and that's just for edit-warring. It is just a matter of spending our time and energy to file an AE to further his sanctions. Proudbolsahye (talk) 06:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Go ahead reverting it. If people has objections they can express their opinions in the already opened topic in the talk page. Proudbolsahye (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Turns out the ANI report has been archived. Would you want to reapply? Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Report him just like how ShadowCrow reported him at ANI... Proudbolsahye (talk) 04:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
verify credibility
Hello. Please read it. -Esc2003 (talk) 22:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The boundary and Geography of Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia & Kingdom of Armenia (antiquity)
The boundary and Geography of Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia & Kingdom of Armenia (antiquity); Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia & Kingdom of Armenia (antiquity) are not a part of Anatolian History!! 68.100.160.250 (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Historical boundaries
This means that their Historical boundaries were never overlapped and enter into Anatolia, which may be well-new definition for the Middle East. 68.100.160.250 (talk) 19:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Peacedove.svg/60px-Peacedove.svg.png)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Khojaly Massacre#Number_of_civilians_affected". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 18:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
your recent revert
Hello. You recently reverted to a controversial material that is based on WP:OR. Please discuss on relevant talk pages if you oppose. I explained my actions here. Hablabar (talk) 03:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
![Stop icon with clock](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. DP 21:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f9/Balance_icon.svg/40px-Balance_icon.svg.png)
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.
You are already under Arbitration sanctions as of your 2013 warning above. To clarify:
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a2/Yellow_traffic_warning.png/20px-Yellow_traffic_warning.png)
Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2, any editor who edits articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility may be placed under several editing restrictions, by notice on that editor's talk page. This notice is to inform you that based on your edits, you are hereby placed under the following restrictions:
- Revert limitation (formerly known as revert parole). You are limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism, and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page.
- Supervised editing (formerly known as probation). You may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should you fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in your interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise.
- Civility supervision (formerly known as civility parole). If you make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then you may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat transgressions.
Enforcement: Violations of limitations, supervision, or bans imposed by the remedies in this case may be enforced by brief blocks of up to a week in the event of repeat violations. After 5 blocks the maximum block period shall increase to one year.
You were warned last June and the log is at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. Note - 'one revert per page per week and discuss any content reversions. See WP:VANDALISM also as if you revert for something that isn't vandalism, no matter what you think it is, that's your one per week. Dougweller (talk) 07:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
This notice is being given to you due to your involvement in an edit war in the affected area. If you disagree with another editor, please engage in calm discussion and seek dispute resolution rather than repeatedly making the same edits. Edit warring behavior will lead to sanctions.
- ^ Hosfeld, Rolf. "The Armenian Massacre and Its Avengersq" (PDF). www.armenews.com. Retrieved 2005.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help)