→Gina Rinehart: new section |
The Rambling Man (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
As well as being an obvious majority, ALL the more recent post on the article's Talk page were in favour of "Chairman". That's probably the most obvious way consensus is made apparent here. And, as the post above points out, you are [[WP:EDITWAR|Edit warring]] and are very close to breaching [[WP:3RR|the Three revert rule]]. Both are blockable offences. So stop what you are doing. Do feel free, however, to continue informed discussion on [[Talk:Gina Rinehart|the article's Talk page]]. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 15:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
As well as being an obvious majority, ALL the more recent post on the article's Talk page were in favour of "Chairman". That's probably the most obvious way consensus is made apparent here. And, as the post above points out, you are [[WP:EDITWAR|Edit warring]] and are very close to breaching [[WP:3RR|the Three revert rule]]. Both are blockable offences. So stop what you are doing. Do feel free, however, to continue informed discussion on [[Talk:Gina Rinehart|the article's Talk page]]. [[User:HiLo48|HiLo48]] ([[User talk:HiLo48|talk]]) 15:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Please heed these warnings. You don't need to break 3RR in 24 hours to be blocked for edit warring. Now stop it. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 17:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:02, 18 October 2014
October 2014
![Stop icon](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please also make your edits consistent throughout or they are likely to be removed as botched. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
As well as being an obvious majority, ALL the more recent post on the article's Talk page were in favour of "Chairman". That's probably the most obvious way consensus is made apparent here. And, as the post above points out, you are Edit warring and are very close to breaching the Three revert rule. Both are blockable offences. So stop what you are doing. Do feel free, however, to continue informed discussion on the article's Talk page. HiLo48 (talk) 15:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Please heed these warnings. You don't need to break 3RR in 24 hours to be blocked for edit warring. Now stop it. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)