PCHS-NJROTC (talk | contribs) Shared IP |
m Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Shared IP gov |
{{Shared IP gov|[[Toronto Transit Commission]]}} |
||
&quo==TTC Special Constables== |
&quo==TTC Special Constables== |
||
From the TTC's own website: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/navpop.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s">t;Uniformed and plainclothes TTC Special Constables are sworn by the Toronto Police Service." Sworn as what? To all intents and purposes they appear to me to be "police" in every common definition of the term. The site also states that they "have the same powers as a Police Officer to enforce the Criminal Code of Canada". Before you start telling me I have no expertise in the subject (being that I am a police officer myself), pray tell me what the difference is. It seems to be merely a peculiarity of terminology, not a real difference. Please also note that it is not sensible to link a whole sentence, as you have done on the [[Transit police]] page. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] 17:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC) |
From the TTC's own website: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/navpop.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s">t;Uniformed and plainclothes TTC Special Constables are sworn by the Toronto Police Service." Sworn as what? To all intents and purposes they appear to me to be "police" in every common definition of the term. The site also states that they "have the same powers as a Police Officer to enforce the Criminal Code of Canada". Before you start telling me I have no expertise in the subject (being that I am a police officer myself), pray tell me what the difference is. It seems to be merely a peculiarity of terminology, not a real difference. Please also note that it is not sensible to link a whole sentence, as you have done on the [[Transit police]] page. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] 17:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:24, 9 March 2013
&quo==TTC Special Constables== From the TTC's own website: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/navpop.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s">t;Uniformed and plainclothes TTC Special Constables are sworn by the Toronto Police Service." Sworn as what? To all intents and purposes they appear to me to be "police" in every common definition of the term. The site also states that they "have the same powers as a Police Officer to enforce the Criminal Code of Canada". Before you start telling me I have no expertise in the subject (being that I am a police officer myself), pray tell me what the difference is. It seems to be merely a peculiarity of terminology, not a real difference. Please also note that it is not sensible to link a whole sentence, as you have done on the Transit police page. -- Necrothesp 17:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Szvest 20:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Szvest 20:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Warnings
July 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alexander_Dyukov. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ptrt (talk) 21:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
3RR violation on Alexander Dyukov and two other articles, by the IP editor 206.186.8.130 (talk · contribs), confirmed to be the sock of User:RJ CG at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RJ CG. The 3RR was reported at WP:AN3. User:RJ CG is named in the Digwuren case of October, 2007. EdJohnston (talk) 05:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Michael F (talk) 23:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
January 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Scarborough RT, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 18:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
August 2010
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Flag of Italy, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Angelo (talk) 20:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
SPI case
Re to this. Just to clarify, I usually do not report suspected sockpuppets, unless they become too disruptive. Therefore, I only left you a message (edit summary) [1] that I know who you are (meaning "stop doing this, please"). But instead of calming down, you started edit war using multiple IP accounts [2]. That is way too disruptive for someone who has been identified already as a sockpuppet account by checkuser. Therefore, I submitted an SPI report. That is what I mean. Thanks, Biophys (talk) 22:14, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Mass removal of sources is not the way to prove your point. Biophys (talk) 03:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
February 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nikon, you may be blocked from editing. Glrx (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)