If you want to change the article's name, that's fine: petition for that — but don't link the redirect over the original. That contravenes our manual of style. Thanks. El_C 08:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. Why, then, do you roll back fixes that aren't related to links to the articles? 217.19.216.247 (talk) 10:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Transnistria— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 12:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- Arguments? This edits was constructive. You reverse is a vandalism. 217.19.216.247 (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 12:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- Is it customary for you to roll back everything without arguments, if you disagree with something, even if it is a stylistic editing of the text? 217.19.216.247 (talk) 12:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please take it to the talk page RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 14:18, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- You need establish WP:consensus as past discussions have not reached a conclusion RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 14:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please take it to the talk page RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 14:18, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- Is it customary for you to roll back everything without arguments, if you disagree with something, even if it is a stylistic editing of the text? 217.19.216.247 (talk) 12:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 14:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- Nobody argued with me, did not make a single argument or even words in general against the amendments, which are mostly stylistic in nature. What then to discuss with you? Idiot. 217.19.208.110 (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)