++ |
111.254.25.210 (talk) Tag: Reply |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Administrator topicon}} |
{{Administrator topicon}} |
||
{{tmbox | text = <span style="color:red;">'''Welcome! Please read this before posting here'''.</span> |
|||
{{tmbox| text = <span style="color:red;">'''<big><big>Welcome! Please read this before posting here.</big></big>'''</span> |
|||
*If you have a problem or need help with something please leave a message. However if your issue does not involve me personally or is time sensitive/urgent you may wish to request help on one of our [[WP:PNBD|noticeboards]]. |
|||
*If I left you a message on your user talk page or elsewhere, please respond there. If you leave me a message here, this is where I will normally respond. If you want to alert me to your message, you may [[WP:MENTION|ping]] me. (It is not necessary to ping me when leaving messages on my talk page as I am automatically alerted by email.) |
|||
*If you have a problem or need help with something please leave a message. However, if your issue does not involve me personally, or is time sensitive/urgent, you may wish to request help on one of our [[WP:PNBD|noticeboards]]. |
|||
*If you are here because you think I made a mistake somewhere, ''YOU COULD BE RIGHT''! I am neither omniscient nor infallible. Let's talk about it. |
*If you are here because you think I made a mistake somewhere, ''YOU COULD BE RIGHT''! I am neither omniscient nor infallible. Let's talk about it. |
||
*Please be polite and remember to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. Also check the potty language at the door. I don't talk to other people that way and I expect the same courtesy in return. |
*Please be polite and remember to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. Also check the potty language at the door. I don't talk to other people that way and I expect the same courtesy in return. |
||
*While minor editing is fine, for the sake of continuity of records please don't delete comments on my talk page even if you later conclude you were wrong. If you want to retract a comment, just add a note or you can <s>strike out the text</s>. |
*While minor editing is fine, for the sake of continuity of records please don't delete comments on my talk page even if you later conclude you were wrong. If you want to retract a comment, just add a note or you can <s>strike out the text</s>. |
||
*'''Private emails''' are welcome. However, in the interest of transparency; requests for administrator actions should generally be made openly either here or on the relevant noticeboard/talk page discussion. Exceptions where commonsense or policy/guidelines may require discretion, are understood. |
|||
*<u>'''Special note to admins'''</u>: If you think I muffed something feel free to revert or otherwise fix it. Just kindly leave a note. Also administrators and other experienced editors should feel free to respond to any queries on this page, especially if the message has been sitting for a while without a response. |
|||
*<u>'''Special note to admins'''</u>: If you think I muffed something feel free to revert or otherwise fix it. Just kindly leave a note. |
|||
*Experienced editors are free to respond to any queries on this page, especially if the message has been sitting for a while without a response. |
|||
*Lastly, I'm a part-timer, so bear with me if I don't get back to you instantly. |
*Lastly, I'm a part-timer, so bear with me if I don't get back to you instantly. |
||
If you have questions comments or concerns feel free to drop me a line below. Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, and remember to sign your |
If you have questions comments or concerns feel free to drop me a line below. Please post new topics at the bottom of this page, and remember to sign your message with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). |
||
<span style="color:green;">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{TALKPAGENAMEE}}&action=edit§ion=new Click here to start a new topic.]</span> |
<span style="color:green;">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{TALKPAGENAMEE}}&action=edit§ion=new Click here to start a new topic.]</span> |
||
<br>}} |
<br>}} |
||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
||
| age=336 |
|||
|archiveprefix=User talk:Ad Orientem/Archive |
|||
| archiveprefix=User talk:Ad Orientem/Archive |
|||
|format= %%i |
|||
| numberstart=1 |
|||
|age=240 |
|||
|maxarchsize= |
| maxarchsize=75000 |
||
| header={{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|||
|numberstart=1 |
|||
| minkeepthreads=5 |
|||
|archivebox=yes |
|||
| minarchthreads=2 |
|||
|box-advert=yes |
|||
| format= %%i |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Archives}} |
|||
== Disruptive user == |
|||
== Miller Baking Company Comment == |
|||
Hi, can you expand a little on your rationale for No Consensus? The first Keep !vote uses the term "reliable sources" which is not the criteria for establishing notability. The next doesn't use any policy based arguments. The next also uses "third-party reliable sources" which isn't the criteria. The last states they've added references and posted a requested move. Basically, none of the Keep !voters have provided any indication of the criteria in NCORP. Can you help me understand how you weighted the Yea and Nay !votes? Thank you. [[User:HighKing|<b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family: Courier; color: #da0000;">++ </span>]]</sup> 11:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:HighKing]] hmm, I thought I had satisfied [[WP:BEFORE]] and the article was deletion worthy. I seem to have removed it from my watchlist, or else I would have made this request myself. [[User:2Joules|2Joules]] ([[User talk:2Joules|talk]]) 14:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::I will take another look as soon as I have cleared out my morning inbox. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 14:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::@{{u|HighKing}} & {{u|2Joules}} After taking a closer look at the discussion and the article I have decided to re-open the discussion and relist it. You can read my explanation in the relist notice, but the short version is I think the pro-delete arguments are weightier than the keep, but I am not satisfied that consensus to that end is sufficiently strong to delete. This could be called a no consensus given that it has already been relisted twice, but I think we are close enough to consensus to justify a third relist. Thanks for bringing your concerns to my attention. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 15:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Sheesh, sorry to come back to this but I just don't get it. There were two more Keep !votes added after the discussion. One from the author, Jayfish420 who pretty much admits as his last comment that he's ''uploading appropriate supporting material now'' but never did. The last was by HenryMP02 who !votes using reasoning that is clearly ruled out in policy and guidelines. At worst (and only because the nom had been blocked as a sock) it should have been closed as No Consensus. Based on your comments before reopening that the arguments were stronger for deletion, it should have been closed as Delete. This isn't a !vote counting contest as we all know but the evidence on this AfD makes me think that sometimes, that is actually what is comes down to. [[User:HighKing|<b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family: Courier; color: #da0000;">++ </span>]]</sup> 11:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Good morning {{U|HighKing}} OK, I took yet another look at this. There is no way this could be closed as a delete. There is clearly no consensus that supports such a close. NOTAVOTE is not carte blanche for ignoring what appears to be consensus or inventing one that doesn't exist. However, I do think I erred in the close. This should have been procedurally closed as soon as the nom was identified as a sock per DENY. I am going to alter the close accordingly. This will be w/o prejudice to a speedy renomination if you are so inclined. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 15:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::::No probs. I won't renom straight away either - I think the product might be notable so there's no real harm in leaving it at the "wrong" title for a while [[User:HighKing|<b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family: Courier; color: #da0000;">++ </span>]]</sup> 16:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Actually, there's another AfD that was nominated by a (now) blocked sock - [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/StuMagz StuMagz]. [[User:HighKing|<b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family: Courier; color: #da0000;">++ </span>]]</sup> 10:39, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::AfD closed per DENY. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 15:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks. While you're on a roll - here's yet another couple - [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Furniture_Choice AfD of Furniture Choice] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sunesis_Pharmaceuticals Sunesis Pharmaceuticals]. [[User:HighKing|<b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family: Courier; color: #da0000;">++ </span>]]</sup> 16:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Closed per DENY. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 16:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::@{{u|HighKing}} FYI most of these have been reverted, correctly, based on WP:SK4. As I just got handed my head so to speak, I am going to recuse myself from further involvement in those discussions. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 23:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Denis Law (politician) == |
|||
I understand that the numerical votes in the discussion (as it was) favored deletion, but I think it is important that as the closer of the AfD, that you add explanation for the close. Most of the delete votes (Nom, Tillerh11, John Paul Lambert) put in their comments before the expansion of the article (now I feel appropriate proclaiming [[WP:HEY]]). The argument raised in favor of deletion by SportingFlyer was rejected by Bearcat. And, it is not hard to characterize Mangoe's argument as "only things that happen in big cities are important." But, because AfD is not a vote, but a discussion of policy, I feel that as the closer, you should articulate which rational(s) you based the close upon, rather than a simple "delete." |
|||
As Bearcat alluded earlier on your talk page (which I also fully agree with), these AfDs do set precedent (to a degree, as certain arguments are stronger than others). In my concluding comments on the AfD, "there are lots of local mayors" who are similar to the final version of the (now) deleted page, who are mayors of cities with a substantial sized population, whose article is greater than stub length, and whose merits would presumably be debated around the "significant things he did in the position" - as Bearcat mentioned, which is not, traditionally, been a question of this project. --[[User:Enos733|Enos733]] ([[User talk:Enos733|talk]]) 06:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:This is not a case of vote counting. There is a fairly strong [[WP:CONSENSUS]] that the coverage in reliable sources is insufficient to ring the WP:N bell. When I read the discussion it appeared that you were taking issue with NPOL and or the way it has been applied. That may well be a discussion worth having. But this isn't the right venue for that. The bottomline is that AfD is not always perfect or even generally consistent. We base our decisions on consensus and that is typically dictated by those who show up for the discussion and in all but the rarest of cases, which ''would'' need a serious explanation, a closing admin is bound to respect that. Indeed if anyone closed this as a Keep or even a No Consensus I think such a close might well be challenged at DRV with a very strong likelihood of being overturned. Best regards... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 14:46, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Where would be the appropriate forum to have the discussion? Because, by endorsing the close, I feel that the strongest argument for deletion along the lines of not sufficient coverage in reliable sources completely discounts any local reporting, to the point of worthlessness. Also, because the arguments that the sources were insufficient came before substantial work was done on the article (taking it from a very incomplete stub to a full article), the close also has the effect of discouraging recreation (as revised). --[[User:Enos733|Enos733]] ([[User talk:Enos733|talk]]) 16:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::If you want to discuss the guidelines for notability relating to politicians that can be done at [[WT:BIO]]. If you want to challenge the actual close that would be done at [[WP:DRV]]. In the latter case please read the directions carefully as DRV is not where you rehash the AfD but rather whether the closing admin correctly interpreted the consensus. Best regards... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 16:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Are you wiling to put the article in my draft space? The problem I run into is that if the decision to close was based on inadequate sources I am not sure what sources are needed to add to the article to satisfy concerns of the delete votes (based on the most recent version, not the article when it was proposed for deletion). --[[User:Enos733|Enos733]] ([[User talk:Enos733|talk]]) 17:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::::{{done}} @{{u|Enos733}} This page is not to be restored to the mainspace w/o first being submitted as a draft for review at [[WP:AfC]]. Good luck. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 18:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Girls Like You page protection == |
|||
Hey AO. Basically every day, an IP in the 83.xx.xxx.xxx range is coming back around to [[Girls Like You]] and adding a bunch of unreliable charts (listed at [[WP:BADCHARTS]]), unsourced or component charts we don't need. Can you maybe protect it for a bit? This 83-range IP is persistent with Maroon 5 articles; they did it previously at [[What Lovers Do]] as well. <b>[[User:Ss112|<span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Ss112|<span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span>]]</small></b> 12:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Has there been any attempt to communicate with this user on a talk page somewhere? I realize that may be difficult if they are a dynamic IP. But while potentially disruptive, and certainly irritating, this isn't naked vandalism. Some attempt at communication should normally be attempted before protecting pages that do garner a high level of editing from the internet. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 15:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::I did explain them multiple times to check [[WP:BADCHARTS]] on the talk pages of various IP addresses they used to edit [[What Lovers Do]]. They would continue restoring it regardless. This is what's happening here, and I've just undone another round of it. <b>[[User:Ss112|<span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Ss112|<span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span>]]</small></b> 16:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Page protected for a few days. Let's see what happens after that. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 18:28, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Choice? == |
|||
Hi there! I was interested to see your close [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furniture Choice|here]], and wondered if you had seen the brief discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#Sockpuppet nominations]]. I'm fully in agreement with you, but I'm not sure that those other editors would be. Regards, [[User:Justlettersandnumbers|Justlettersandnumbers]] ([[User talk:Justlettersandnumbers|talk]]) 19:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for the heads up. I was not aware of the discussion and have just dropped a note there. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 19:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Hutterite Christian Communities == |
|||
Hi there, please help me understand why two of our communities have been deleted. |
|||
Thank-you <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rus2er|Rus2er]] ([[User talk:Rus2er#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rus2er|contribs]]) 21:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Hi [[User:Rus2er|Rus2er]]. Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately two articles that were created in good faith were alleged to not meet our guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Generally we require any subject being considered for a possible article to have a certain measure of notability. This is discussed in detail at [[WP:N]]. The principle guidelines for establishing notability in this situation are [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:ORG]]. Discussions regarding these two articles were opened in [[WP:AFD]]. Those discussions can be viewed [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grand_River_Christian_Community here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Altona_Christian_Community here]. Due to inadequate participation these discussions were closed as what we call a "soft delete." This means that anyone can request the articles be restored. However I must advise you that I believe both articles have significant shortcomings that are likely to result in their being renominated for deletion. If you would like, I can restore them both and move them into a subpage of your username. This will allow you to work on them while they are not in the encyclopedia's mainspace. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 21:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meessen De Clercq]] == |
|||
{{u|Ad Orientem}}—as I hope you will agree I have been cautious and restrained in my participation at the Meessen De Clercq AfD since you have warned me about my problematic participation. I have a registered account. But the IP, variously known as 96.127.242.226, or 104.163.157.79, or 198.58.163.19, has free rein to say anything they want and almost nothing to loose. They have told me three times[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Meessen_De_Clercq&diff=847651718&oldid=847651579][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Meessen_De_Clercq&diff=848061449&oldid=847949612][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Meessen_De_Clercq&diff=848276059&oldid=848226945] that I am bludgeoning the discussion. And with virtually every post that they make they are blatantly misrepresenting me. They present my argument entirely contrary to what I have argued, and I have corrected them many times. This is obviously a game that I am playing with someone who has nothing to lose. In their most recent post they say {{tq|"If we adopt that as policy then movie theaters who show films by notable directors, bookstores that have author talks, bars and clubs that present notable musicians and perhaps even restaurants who have have hired notable chefs will all be eligible."}} I never, ever—not even once—presented an argument which says that notable artists or notable artworks confer notability on art galleries. All I really ask is that you lift the verbal and informal restrictions on my participation in that AfD. I understand not to "bludgeon". I would like to feel free to participate and I promise to do so with restraint. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop|talk]]) 22:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] I am fine with responding to arguments that are misrepresenting and the like. I just don't want to see the same points being repeated [[ad nauseum]]. That AfD is already insanely long. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 22:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Thank you. I will be cautious and restrained. I am more to blame than anyone else for the AfD being as lengthy as it is but I will be careful from this point forward. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop|talk]]) 22:50, 15 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thank you. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 22:56, 15 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{outdent}} Hi Ad Orientem—[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/De_Sarthe_Gallery&diff=850759758&oldid=850748615 here] is 96.127.242.226/104.163.157.79/198.58.163.19 at ''another'' AfD for an art gallery telling me {{tq|"Yes, and all of those articles were deleted, because what Justlettersandnumbers said was accurate. Please do not badger this AfD as you have done at other AfDs. If you keep up the WP:IDONTLIKEIT and walls of text, I would say you are headed for a topic ban."}} I actually only made one post to that page although I did so in multiple edits. I have not [[WP:BAIT|taken the bait]] and lashed out verbally at this unregistered account because I have a registered account. This is not a level playing field. Nor do I want to interact on that level. The IP's activity has a lot to do with me, and that is trolling. I have no doubt that they want these articles deleted but they also want to prevent me from participating in these discussions. By the way I have actually voted in favor of unregistered accounts during one of the times that this was under discussion. But this shows the abuse and unaccountability that unregistered accounts make possible. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop|talk]]) 23:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Hi Ad Orientem—I guess I should be glad that I have an IP to keep me in line. [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stev´nn Hall|Here]] they are once again voicing objection to my method of participation. Their finalized version of their post was preceded by these tentative versions: |
|||
* "Sorry, I am not going to engage with your tiresome arguments."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stev%C2%B4nn_Hall&diff=851261826&oldid=851257578] |
|||
* "Sorry, I am not going to engage with your tiresome arguments, per previous AfDs."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stev%C2%B4nn_Hall&diff=next&oldid=851261826] |
|||
* "Sorry, I am not going to engage with your tiresome repetitive arguments, per previous AfDs. You are just repeating everything you already said."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stev%C2%B4nn_Hall&diff=next&oldid=851261960] |
|||
* "You are just repeating everything you already said in an earlier comment. Please avoid using repetition to bludgeon the discussion."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stev%C2%B4nn_Hall&diff=next&oldid=851262077] |
|||
* "You are just repeating everything you already said in an earlier comment. Please avoid using repetition and walls of text to bludgeon the discussion."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stev%C2%B4nn_Hall&diff=next&oldid=851262685] |
|||
This IP has been saying this to me at several articles for deletion. Back in March of 2017 at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albemarle Gallery]] I've got this IP saying: |
|||
* "Your badgering of every commenter is not helping your case."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Albemarle_Gallery&diff=769474966&oldid=769473361] |
|||
* "Comment—Bus stop, badgering everyone who comes to this AfD with an opinion isn't helpful. Do you think you could just chill out and let this proceed? It's not meant to be a battleground."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Albemarle_Gallery&diff=769620056&oldid=769613815] |
|||
* "I also note that you have been blocked for edit warring and other conduct issues at least a half a dozen times."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Albemarle_Gallery&diff=769636832&oldid=769626892] |
|||
* "Note to Bus stop, please don't bother bludgeoning me with your tired BUTILIKEIT arguments; they don't change policy."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Albemarle_Gallery&diff=769869563&oldid=769781687] |
|||
In all instances the IP is concerned with my behavior. But is their behavior proper? They have made me their private obsession. The aim is generally the same—that I've said too much and that it is time that I learned to be silent. This is an ongoing phenomenon and it doesn't show any sign of letting up. Thanks. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop|talk]]) 13:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Message of Thanks == |
|||
Thank You for stopping the issue. I feel hurt that Hotwiki lashed me out over High-Quality images. I did not do anything wrong. In my heart, I did it right but i have shortcomings. I hope you understand. |
|||
:@{{u|Veluz330}} You are both good editors. Sometimes we get into snits and need to be reminded that we are all on the same team. Thank you for all of your work on the project. Best regards... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 04:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Closure of Account == |
|||
I request the closure of the Veluz330 account because i used Wikipedia Irresponsibly. Please approve my permanent account closure thanks. |
|||
:{{not done}} You got into a snit with another editor. It happens to pretty much all of us from time to time. Learn from the experience and move on. Beyond which I do not block editors other than as a last resort for persistent disruptive behavior. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 14:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
You SON OF A BITCH you accused me that i got into a snit. Go ahead Punch me in the body. |
|||
:W/E -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 03:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
What's "W/E" Coward? |
|||
:As a [[Wikipedia:Talk page stalker|stalker]] here I find that wiktionary defines it as a slang abbreviation for [[wiktionary:w/e|whatever]]. [[User:Bus stop|Bus stop]] ([[User talk:Bus stop|talk]]) 19:27, 18 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Reinstate Ford V Ferrari Page == |
|||
Shooting on this film has begun. |
|||
https://twitter.com/JohnSant87/status/1018121391907004417 |
|||
Christian bale is in le mans france. You still think this movie is not going to get made ? They sent director and cast to france so they can cancel the movie ? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Surajvedula|Surajvedula]] ([[User talk:Surajvedula#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Surajvedula|contribs]]) 19:50, 17 July 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:{{not done}} Twitter is not a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. If/when you believe the draft is ready for review please submit it to [[WP:AFC]] for review. This can be done by applying the following template to the top of the draft... <nowiki>{{AFC submission}}</nowiki>. Best regards... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 20:10, 17 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
whats a reliable source ? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Surajvedula|Surajvedula]] ([[User talk:Surajvedula#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Surajvedula|contribs]]) 14:48, 18 July 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Good morning {{U|Surajvedula}}. Reliable sources and their importance are explained at [[WP:RS]]. Additionally you may wish to look at [[WP:CITE]] and [[WP:GNG]]. Best regards... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 15:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
good morning thats a big ass page and I can't read it. My question is, why do you have a page about the movie "once upon a time in hollywood" but not about this movie ? that is being released in July 2019 and this is in June 2019..so this movie will come out before that and general public who wish to spend their money to watch this movie needs to know that this movie exists. By not allowing this page to exist you are hurting the box office of this movie. Don't you think it is pretty vile and evil ? delete one upon a time in hollywood page as well then I will shut the fuck up. |
|||
:[[WP:NOPROMO|Wikipedia is not an advertising platform]]. We don't exist to promote box office sales. We are an encyclopedia that has guidelines for inclusion. I have provided you with links to those guidelines. If you don't have the time or inclination to read them then I think it will be difficult for you to contribute constructively to the project. I don't know about the other article and am not overly concerned with it. See [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]], another page you probably won't take the time to read. If I may inquire, why are you here? -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 02:37, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Hello. Its not about marketing. Its about treating all movie fairly. You should not show partiality to a movie. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Surajvedula|Surajvedula]] ([[User talk:Surajvedula#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Surajvedula|contribs]]) 15:25, 19 July 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
: [[Stalker]] here Surajvedula. Your observation is correct in that we do indeed show partiality to movies here. We evaluate whether a film's announcements come from a major studio and/or if their production status is published in reliable sources. In this case "reliable sources" would mean respected industry publications or newspapers which employ fact checking and editorial oversight. Anybody can have a Twitter account and make whatever claims they want. <span style="color: blue">[[User:Blue Riband|Blue]] [[User talk:Blue Riband|Riband►]]</span> 20:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement#rfc_8D4E1B9|Talk:U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement#rfc_8D4E1B9|this request for comment on '''Talk:U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 91256 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:27, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Secure-K OS == |
|||
Hi, |
|||
some time ago I wrote an article about Secure-K OS, which has been deleted by you because of notability concerns; time has passed and the operating system is now enlisted in the official directory of Distrowatch (distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=securek) and Softpedia, to name two important independent sources. |
|||
Hello! back in May you blocked a user named "Bkeira" for disruptive editing. Their disruptive editing has worsened til the point another user has complained to me on my page in regards to them. I think that it's time for "Bkeira" to be banned permanently. "Bkeira" is obsessed with editing composition sections on music articles. Their edits usually consist of original research, and when users revert their edits they engage in edit wars. [[User:OkIGetIt20|OkIGetIt20]] ([[User talk:OkIGetIt20|talk]]) 17:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Considerig that system is the first (ISO9660) live to feature a kernel update - so it brings also innovation to the bunch of Linux lives - can a related article appear now? |
|||
:@[[User:OkIGetIt20|OkIGetIt20]] Are you sure you have the right user? There is no record for a user named Bkeira. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 18:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Regards, |
|||
::@[[User:OkIGetIt20|OkIGetIt20]] Never mind. I figured it out and have blocked them for a week. They are on notice that this is the last stop before an indefinite block. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 18:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Marco. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Marcoburatto|Marcoburatto]] ([[User talk:Marcoburatto#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Marcoburatto|contribs]]) 07:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Hi {{u|Marcoburatto}}. I'm sorry but neither of those are reliable sources. Notability requires in depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. Please see [[ WP:RS]], [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:NPRODUCT]]. Best regards... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 18:58, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== The 92.53.17.0/24 saga continues... == |
|||
== BlaccCrab is back == |
|||
Hi Ad Orientem, |
|||
Hey AO, BlaccCrab is back using {{noping|VanWinkle92}}. Same tone in edit summaries, and much the same topics as BlaccCrab—Sean Paul, Ty Dolla Sign, recent hip hop and alternative rock album, song and discography pages. They've even been edit warring with DovahDuck about what is a single and what's not on [[Trench (album)]], which was fully protected because of it. Another dead giveaway is that they expanded [[Pineapple (Ty Dolla Sign song)]] from a redirect, as Ty Dolla Sign appeared to be one of BlaccCrab's favourite targets. <b>[[User:Ss112|<span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Ss112|<span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span>]]</small></b> 17:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Indeffed. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 18:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
In December 2022, you blocked the 92.53.17.0/24 range for one year for disruptive edits ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3A92.53.17.0%2F24 block log]). Their changes are typically made under the "New changes" edit summary. |
|||
==Usman47== |
|||
While there has no longer been any more disruption from that IP range since the block expired, unfortunately they have still been at it with other addresses/ranges, resulting in them getting blocked as well (e.g. [[Special:Contribs/31.11.96.0/19|31.11.96.0/19]]). |
|||
After spending some time into this, I have collected some evidence. CU logs are not reliable as you know and out of fear Usman47 indirectly admitted to be sharing same location as Hassan Guy. |
|||
Right now, they seem to be using the range [[Special:Contribs/46.123.240.0/20|46.123.240.0/20]] for the most part. However, Binksternet on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Block evasion from Slovenia and Macedonia|this AN/I report]] recommends blocking two smaller ranges, [[Special:Contribs/46.123.241.0/24|46.123.241.0/24]] and [[Special:Contribs/46.123.248.0/21|46.123.248.0/21]] instead. |
|||
Usman47 wrote "so that I can continue to positively contribute to this community"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Usman47&diff=prev&oldid=851339648] in |
|||
unblock request which is similar to unblock statements from Hassan Guy account.. "I can operate as a constructive member here and that I do in fact deserve a last chance,"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hassan_Guy&diff=prev&oldid=791054348] "I really want to be a part of this website and contribute."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hassan_Guy&diff=next&oldid=791054901] And they both never signed their unblock requests. |
|||
Just wondering if you could look at it and decide whether to block the larger encompassing /20 range, or those two smaller aforementioned ranges; asking since the AN/I thread hasn't received attention for two days. |
|||
Both can't indent their comments.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_active_Pakistan_Navy_ships&diff=807610791&oldid=807610412][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sdmarathe&diff=848774863&oldid=848772124] |
|||
Regards, — [[User:AP 499D25|<span style="background:#1F6295;color:white;padding:1q 5q;border-radius:10q;font-family:Franklin Gothic, Verdana">AP 499D25</span>]] [[User talk:AP 499D25|<span style="color:#1A527D">(talk)</span>]] 01:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
His style of providing references is also same: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_active_Pakistan_Navy_ships&diff=prev&oldid=807610164][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sdmarathe&diff=prev&oldid=848774863] |
|||
:@[[User:AP 499D25|AP 499D25]] I've blocked the /20 range x 6 months. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 02:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hassan Guy told back in the day that: "I actually talked about this on '''defence.pk''' You see when I was first banned I actually talked about this on defence.pk (the pakistan defence forrum), I did end up getting in contact with my boys and I have seen whats been going on over the past week because it was raised up again. I saw that lovely page that indian dude made for me, I find it funny he thinks where all the same guy. (there not even in Oman anymore, i think idk)."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hassan_Guy&diff=prev&oldid=803275294] Usman47 seems to have discussed his Wikipedia incidents on defence.pk as well[https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/urgent-all-pakistani-defence-enthusiasts-should-look-into-this.566121/#post-10606134] about what he was doing on [[Regional power]], during this same period.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regional_power&diff=prev&oldid=848768807] |
|||
::Thanks! I'm sure Binksternet would appreciate it too! — [[User:AP 499D25|<span style="background:#1F6295;color:white;padding:1q 5q;border-radius:10q;font-family:Franklin Gothic, Verdana">AP 499D25</span>]] [[User talk:AP 499D25|<span style="color:#1A527D">(talk)</span>]] 04:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Uncterchud == |
|||
Even his statement here or defence.pk are same.. |
|||
Please also revoke TPA from [[User:Uncterchud|Uncterchud]] and [[User:Bonefrag|Bonefrag]] as they are likely socks of [[User:Pœnis|Pœnis]], whose TPA has been revoked, based on behavioral evidence: lewd images of women and harassing me on my userspace. [[User:Air on White|Air on White]] ([[User talk:Air on White|talk]]) 01:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
On Wikipedia:- |
|||
:@[[User:Air on White|Air on White]] Done. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 01:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:"is also evident that Indian's don't want Pakistan listed as a regional power"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lorstaking&diff=prev&oldid=848940819] |
|||
:"you have been abusing your powers just to keep Pakistan out of the list"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sdmarathe&diff=prev&oldid=848771069] |
|||
:"Indian's have been removing Pakistan from the section for quite some time. Now it is becoming very difficult to find proper citations to counter this problem."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PakEditor&diff=prev&oldid=848941942] |
|||
== Blocked IP == |
|||
On defence.pk:- |
|||
Saw you blocked my IP address recently for disruptive editing, but wasn't sure why. I'm assuming it wasn't for something I did, since all of those edits are still live (and, as far as I can tell, properly sourced). The one closest to the block date was an edit to [[List of 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup controversies]] (the most recent edit, made June 7th), which was a to correct a spelling error (the only change). I assume that the block isn't for that edit, and it's the only edit made by that IP. |
|||
:"they also keep removing Pakistan from regional power under south Asia. I reverted it back few times before but these low life keyboard warriors keep coming back to show their ugliness."[https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/urgent-all-pakistani-defence-enthusiasts-should-look-into-this.566121/#post-10606134] |
|||
:"You can always see the editing history, revert it to the previous version or edit it and give sources. And the person who is misreporting and making an article biased can be reported. But again this filth is like cockroaches keep lingering around."[https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/urgent-all-pakistani-defence-enthusiasts-should-look-into-this.566121/#post-10606151] |
|||
Reason I wasn't logged in, was because I keep getting logged out, and I can't be bothered to log back in just to fix a minor issue. |
|||
Usman47 was clearly talking about his own experiences since he was the one who continued to "revert it to the previous version"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regional_power&diff=848768807&oldid=848681481][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regional_power&diff=prev&oldid=848775890] and "give sources",[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sdmarathe&diff=848774863&oldid=848772124] then try recruiting people on-wiki as well.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PakEditor&diff=prev&oldid=848941942] |
|||
Just would like some clarification as to what exactly the block was for, so I can avoid making the mistake again (assuming it was something I did, and not someone else in the household). [[User:Jaydee Richardson|Jaydee Richardson]] ([[User talk:Jaydee Richardson|talk]]) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks [[User:Orientls|Orientls]] ([[User talk:Orientls|talk]]) 19:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:I agree. Even when I unblocked him I believed, and still believe, he is a sock. But the CU evidence raised what I think most people would call a reasonable doubt. When I unblocked him I was careful not state that he was innocent. All of which said, I am just not comfortable with a unilateral block here. This will have to be sorted out at SPI or maybe ANI, though I think that is probably not the right venue. For now I suggest monitoring and collecting evidence that can be laid out at a later date that is compelling enough to convince a jury in a capital murder trial. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 19:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Hi [[User:Jaydee Richardson|Jaydee Richardson]]. I'm not sure what the specific reason was because I cannot see the IP address associated with this account. However, over the last few days I have imposed several range blocks because one or more users within those ranges were IP hopping and causing a lot of disruption. It's possible your IP was caught in one of those blocks, though I can't state anything with certainty without knowing the IP address in question. That said, please don't post your IP here as that can be used by people with malicious intent. If you want a more definitive explanation, feel free to email me privately with your IP and I will have a look at the blog log. Editing anonymously is not prohibited generally speaking. However shared IP addresses are vulnerable to these kinds of blocks for obvious reasons. I see that you have recently signed up for an account. That is almost always the best way to edit the encyclopedia and it also over time will allow you to contribute to areaa of the project that are protected from anonymous editing. Best regards... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 11:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
This is a case of pure bad luck for me. I had no clue I was even suspected of this. You are right in your own sense that I happen to be making very similar mistakes to what he did. In fact the similarities between us are mind-boggling. You can have your doubts about me but to my defense if I was a sockpuppet and I had a little bit of brain left in me I won't do the same thing again due to which I had been blocked many times before. I was also not recruiting anyone neither did I get any help from them. Pak editor replied me like a day or 2 ago saying that the article was already fixed and then he asked for my help too [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PakEditor#Help_needed_in_Regional_Powers_section]. When an article is disputed it's bound to get attention from multiple editors. Same goes for the Regional power article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Regional_power#Pakistan]. Now the article is in WP:DRN [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Regional_power#Pakistan] and any decision that comes out of that will be accepted. Still I apologize for the inconvenience I have caused to both of you. btw I'm not on defence.pk and there is no proof that I ever posted anything on it because there are a lot of people on defence.pk who mentioned that they tried to the same thing when editing on Wikipedia. Please read [https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/urgent-all-pakistani-defence-enthusiasts-should-look-into-this.566121/]. When I posted that Hassan Guy's IP and my IP can be in the same range I was under the impression that maybe this is some sort of range block. When I looked back at all the evidence against me I was puzzled. It's just unexplainable. I can't prove that I am not a sockpuppet and I happen to be making very similar style of mistakes. From now on I will try my best not to get caught in this kind of issue. The reason I don't properly sign my comments is because of my inexperience. I will work on that too. Again I am very sorry for what happened. I won't mess around disputed articles again without first talking on the talk page. [[User:Usman47|Usman47]] ([[User talk:Usman47|talk]]) 02:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::This is my first account. I have another one, but forgot the login info, since I barely used it. If you need to know the IP, you can see it in the last edit to the page linked in my message. |
|||
::There's a chance that my dad might've edited something, since he got me to do that a few months ago. He doesn't have an account as far as I can tell. |
|||
::I'll remember to be logged in from now on though. [[User:Jaydee Richardson|Jaydee Richardson]] ([[User talk:Jaydee Richardson|talk]]) 12:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Jaydee Richardson|Jaydee Richardson]] The block log only shows a single page block for that specific IP and no current site blocks. So if you were blocked then it was almost certainly a range block and it has since expired. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 13:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::Says it expires July 15th. |
|||
::::Well, doesn't matter, I'll just stay logged in now, so I'll still be able to edit things if need be. [[User:Jaydee Richardson|Jaydee Richardson]] ([[User talk:Jaydee Richardson|talk]]) 08:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::@[[User:Jaydee Richardson|Jaydee Richardson]] Ok. I see the issue. You were caught in a range block for 2a02:c7c::/32. You can see the editing history for that range [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:0:0:0:0:0:0/32|here]] and the block log [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3A2A02%3AC7C%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A0%3A0%2F32&type=block here]. There has been a very long history of disruption within that range. [[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 16:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Interesting. And most of those pages were relating to football/soccer, which might explain why my edits got caught up in it the block. [[User:Jaydee Richardson|Jaydee Richardson]] ([[User talk:Jaydee Richardson|talk]]) 09:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Question about an edit summary == |
|||
—Ad Orientem am I now allowed to revert back the articles I have edited so far? I have spent a lot of time writing them and after this accusation they were all reverted back. Now since the accusation isn't proven what about all the hard work I have done? I am not talking about disputed articles here. These are the articles I was working on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PAF_Base_Nur_Khan&oldid=851321844] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pakistan_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction&oldid=851326280] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transporter_erector_launcher&oldid=848634548] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Pakistan_Air_Force_squadrons&oldid=851322461] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maritime_Security_Agency&oldid=851335533] [[User:Usman47|Usman47]] ([[User talk:Usman47|talk]]) 04:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Extrajudicial_killings_in_the_Gaza_Strip&diff=prev&oldid=1230328998 |
|||
::Make sure your edits are undoubtedly correct and ask the person who reverted you. Provide them the reasons why they should self revert and wait until they reply or it is obvious that you can revert after discussing. [[User:Orientls|Orientls]] ([[User talk:Orientls|talk]]) 11:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Did I do something wrong? Did somebody else? Or is that page protection just routine for anything on the topic? (tag me in the reply to make sure I see the notification please) [[User:MWQs|MWQs]] ([[User talk:MWQs|talk]]) 12:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks! :) [[User:Usman47|Usman47]] ([[User talk:Usman47|talk]]) 14:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:MWQs|MWQs]] That page is covered by discretionary sanctions authorized under [[WP:CTOP|Contentious Topics]]. In this case the Arab Israeli conflict. Articles dealing with that subject broadly construed are routinely protected because there is a long history of vandalism and ideologically motivated disruptive editing within that subject area. That said, you are an extended confirmed user and should be able to edit the page w/o any problems. Best regards... -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 16:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Special:Diff/851547098]] == |
|||
::Thank you. [[User:MWQs|MWQs]] ([[User talk:MWQs|talk]]) 00:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Jack Walker]] == |
|||
You forgot this one :) <nowiki>~</nowiki> [[User:Abelmoschus Esculentus|<span style="background:#008000; color:white; padding:2px;">'''Abelmoschus Esculentus'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Abelmoschus Esculentus|talk to me]]) 02:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:Oops you just revdel it when I posted this message. <nowiki>~</nowiki> [[User:Abelmoschus Esculentus|<span style="background:#008000; color:white; padding:2px;">'''Abelmoschus Esculentus'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Abelmoschus Esculentus|talk to me]]) 02:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::I'm working my way through this clown's contrib log. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 02:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::Nice, looks like they've all been taken care of. {{smiley}} <nowiki>~</nowiki> [[User:Abelmoschus Esculentus|<span style="background:#008000; color:white; padding:2px;">'''Abelmoschus Esculentus'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Abelmoschus Esculentus|talk to me]]) 02:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::::Yeah, I don't usually start off with a 30 day block with no previous ones for an IP, but that was just flatly unacceptable. If it had been an established account I would have indeffed them on the spot. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 02:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks for the block on that IP address. You might want to semi-protect the page for awhile as well. It recently came off of a semi-protection as well. [[Special:Contributions/73.67.145.30|73.67.145.30]] ([[User talk:73.67.145.30|talk]]) 19:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
:{{Done}} -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 19:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:No worries. He is done. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 03:00, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== List of all-time NBA win–loss records == |
|||
I know he is. But still thank you and have a great evening [[User:ARMcgrath|ARMcgrath]] ([[User talk:ARMcgrath|talk]]) 03:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
this page is competely ok, and some same link should not have more. [[Special:Contributions/2001:B011:E000:15D2:1090:2BC8:8D23:C344|2001:B011:E000:15D2:1090:2BC8:8D23:C344]] ([[User talk:2001:B011:E000:15D2:1090:2BC8:8D23:C344|talk]]) 22:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Original research? == |
|||
:Concerns were raised at [[WP:RFPP]]. Please discuss any issues on the article talk page. Thank you for your contributions to the project. -[[User:Ad Orientem|Ad Orientem]] ([[User talk:Ad Orientem#top|talk]]) 22:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hi AO, just wondering what you think on an issue. So [[Guns N' Roses]] recently re-released ''[[Appetite for Destruction]]'' and the album re-charted on a lot of countries' album charts. An editor has recently listed a whole new chart table on the album article and [[Guns N' Roses discography]] claiming that the re-released edition (called the "Locked N' Loaded Edition") has actually charted, when most chart publishers only list the original album (no 'edition') as re-charting. In fact, other than published articles that explicitly state "because of the re-release, the album has re-entered the chart", I can't find a single listing of the "Locked N' Loaded Edition" spelled out on a chart. This to me constitutes [[WP:OR]] because an editor is claiming they know better than or know what a chart publisher ''actually'' means when all the chart lists is the original album. It might be an "educated assumption" to some but it's still not in any of the sources that it is this specific edition that has charted, and have tagged the sections for OR. <b>[[User:Ss112|<span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Ss112|<span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span>]]</small></b> 04:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::Discussion have been posted in talk, so it is ok. [[Special:Contributions/111.254.25.210|111.254.25.210]] ([[User talk:111.254.25.210|talk]]) 23:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:18, 26 June 2024
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Disruptive user
Hello! back in May you blocked a user named "Bkeira" for disruptive editing. Their disruptive editing has worsened til the point another user has complained to me on my page in regards to them. I think that it's time for "Bkeira" to be banned permanently. "Bkeira" is obsessed with editing composition sections on music articles. Their edits usually consist of original research, and when users revert their edits they engage in edit wars. OkIGetIt20 (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- @OkIGetIt20 Are you sure you have the right user? There is no record for a user named Bkeira. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- @OkIGetIt20 Never mind. I figured it out and have blocked them for a week. They are on notice that this is the last stop before an indefinite block. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
The 92.53.17.0/24 saga continues...
Hi Ad Orientem,
In December 2022, you blocked the 92.53.17.0/24 range for one year for disruptive edits (block log). Their changes are typically made under the "New changes" edit summary.
While there has no longer been any more disruption from that IP range since the block expired, unfortunately they have still been at it with other addresses/ranges, resulting in them getting blocked as well (e.g. 31.11.96.0/19).
Right now, they seem to be using the range 46.123.240.0/20 for the most part. However, Binksternet on this AN/I report recommends blocking two smaller ranges, 46.123.241.0/24 and 46.123.248.0/21 instead.
Just wondering if you could look at it and decide whether to block the larger encompassing /20 range, or those two smaller aforementioned ranges; asking since the AN/I thread hasn't received attention for two days.
Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 01:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- @AP 499D25 I've blocked the /20 range x 6 months. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm sure Binksternet would appreciate it too! — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Uncterchud
Please also revoke TPA from Uncterchud and Bonefrag as they are likely socks of Pœnis, whose TPA has been revoked, based on behavioral evidence: lewd images of women and harassing me on my userspace. Air on White (talk) 01:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Air on White Done. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Blocked IP
Saw you blocked my IP address recently for disruptive editing, but wasn't sure why. I'm assuming it wasn't for something I did, since all of those edits are still live (and, as far as I can tell, properly sourced). The one closest to the block date was an edit to List of 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup controversies (the most recent edit, made June 7th), which was a to correct a spelling error (the only change). I assume that the block isn't for that edit, and it's the only edit made by that IP.
Reason I wasn't logged in, was because I keep getting logged out, and I can't be bothered to log back in just to fix a minor issue.
Just would like some clarification as to what exactly the block was for, so I can avoid making the mistake again (assuming it was something I did, and not someone else in the household). Jaydee Richardson (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Jaydee Richardson. I'm not sure what the specific reason was because I cannot see the IP address associated with this account. However, over the last few days I have imposed several range blocks because one or more users within those ranges were IP hopping and causing a lot of disruption. It's possible your IP was caught in one of those blocks, though I can't state anything with certainty without knowing the IP address in question. That said, please don't post your IP here as that can be used by people with malicious intent. If you want a more definitive explanation, feel free to email me privately with your IP and I will have a look at the blog log. Editing anonymously is not prohibited generally speaking. However shared IP addresses are vulnerable to these kinds of blocks for obvious reasons. I see that you have recently signed up for an account. That is almost always the best way to edit the encyclopedia and it also over time will allow you to contribute to areaa of the project that are protected from anonymous editing. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 11:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is my first account. I have another one, but forgot the login info, since I barely used it. If you need to know the IP, you can see it in the last edit to the page linked in my message.
- There's a chance that my dad might've edited something, since he got me to do that a few months ago. He doesn't have an account as far as I can tell.
- I'll remember to be logged in from now on though. Jaydee Richardson (talk) 12:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jaydee Richardson The block log only shows a single page block for that specific IP and no current site blocks. So if you were blocked then it was almost certainly a range block and it has since expired. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Says it expires July 15th.
- Well, doesn't matter, I'll just stay logged in now, so I'll still be able to edit things if need be. Jaydee Richardson (talk) 08:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jaydee Richardson Ok. I see the issue. You were caught in a range block for 2a02:c7c::/32. You can see the editing history for that range here and the block log here. There has been a very long history of disruption within that range. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting. And most of those pages were relating to football/soccer, which might explain why my edits got caught up in it the block. Jaydee Richardson (talk) 09:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jaydee Richardson Ok. I see the issue. You were caught in a range block for 2a02:c7c::/32. You can see the editing history for that range here and the block log here. There has been a very long history of disruption within that range. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jaydee Richardson The block log only shows a single page block for that specific IP and no current site blocks. So if you were blocked then it was almost certainly a range block and it has since expired. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Question about an edit summary
Did I do something wrong? Did somebody else? Or is that page protection just routine for anything on the topic? (tag me in the reply to make sure I see the notification please) MWQs (talk) 12:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @MWQs That page is covered by discretionary sanctions authorized under Contentious Topics. In this case the Arab Israeli conflict. Articles dealing with that subject broadly construed are routinely protected because there is a long history of vandalism and ideologically motivated disruptive editing within that subject area. That said, you are an extended confirmed user and should be able to edit the page w/o any problems. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. MWQs (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the block on that IP address. You might want to semi-protect the page for awhile as well. It recently came off of a semi-protection as well. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 19:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
List of all-time NBA win–loss records
this page is competely ok, and some same link should not have more. 2001:B011:E000:15D2:1090:2BC8:8D23:C344 (talk) 22:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Concerns were raised at WP:RFPP. Please discuss any issues on the article talk page. Thank you for your contributions to the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion have been posted in talk, so it is ok. 111.254.25.210 (talk) 23:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC)