Content deleted Content added
BrentNewland (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 843: | Line 843: | ||
::::{{User|BrentNewland}}, if you expect me to believe that you, a relatively dormant Wikipedia account that started editing Wikipedia again today only after the relatively dormant Spudst3r account started editing Wikipedia again a day ago, are unrelated to that account when both accounts edit the [[men's rights]] aspect in essentially the same way (including by their focus on [[WP:Words to watch]]), you have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Flyer22&diff=644147408&oldid=644147286#WP:Sockpuppet_watch chosen the wrong person to believe you.] But carry on as usual, I suppose. The truth usually comes out on matters such as these, especially in the obvious cases. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
::::{{User|BrentNewland}}, if you expect me to believe that you, a relatively dormant Wikipedia account that started editing Wikipedia again today only after the relatively dormant Spudst3r account started editing Wikipedia again a day ago, are unrelated to that account when both accounts edit the [[men's rights]] aspect in essentially the same way (including by their focus on [[WP:Words to watch]]), you have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Flyer22&diff=644147408&oldid=644147286#WP:Sockpuppet_watch chosen the wrong person to believe you.] But carry on as usual, I suppose. The truth usually comes out on matters such as these, especially in the obvious cases. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 21:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
:::::"if you expect me to believe" - I don't expect you to believe anything. If you have concerns that I am using multiple accounts, take it to the appropriate notice board https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations Your discussion here is not productive, serves no purpose, and I see it as an attempt to start an argument with me. Please refrain from such accusations and inflammatory discussions outside of their proper venues. [[User:BrentNewland|BrentNewland]] ([[User talk:BrentNewland|talk]]) 21:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::I'm not sure why I'm being brought up in this user talk page... but I might as well respond: In regards to the bad faith accusations from {{User|Flyer22}}: feel free to perform a [[WP:CheckUser]] on my account. You will see I have been editing wikipedia since 2006 on articles that interest me -- the latest [[Men's rights movement]] article being the most recent. Currently the [[men's rights movement]] subject is prominent and receiving significant public attention as of late -- so it's no surprise the article is receiving additional attention from newer editors like myself. Personally I should explain this article caught my attention after reading it due to its heavy use of Expressions of Doubt [[WP:ALLEGED]] and Undue focus [[WP:UNDUE]] on critiques vs. describing opinions within the movement "as they see it." As such, my concerns with the [[men's rights movement]] article are similar with {{User|BrentNewland}}, (as I'm sure the opinions of {{User|Flyer22}} are the same as other active editors on that page) -- but I should clarify that I differ from {{User|BrentNewland}} in that I see the resolution of this conflict coming from making the tone of [[men's rights movement]] article align better with the tone/balance of the [[feminism]] article, rather than vice versa. You will see that my efforts in this regard are already underway, and that during incidents of reverts I have appropriately explained my actions to promote consensus within the talk page. [[User:Spudst3r|Spudst3r]] ([[User talk:Spudst3r|talk]]) 21:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
:::I'm not sure why I'm being brought up in this user talk page... but I might as well respond: In regards to the bad faith accusations from {{User|Flyer22}}: feel free to perform a [[WP:CheckUser]] on my account. You will see I have been editing wikipedia since 2006 on articles that interest me -- the latest [[Men's rights movement]] article being the most recent. Currently the [[men's rights movement]] subject is prominent and receiving significant public attention as of late -- so it's no surprise the article is receiving additional attention from newer editors like myself. Personally I should explain this article caught my attention after reading it due to its heavy use of Expressions of Doubt [[WP:ALLEGED]] and Undue focus [[WP:UNDUE]] on critiques vs. describing opinions within the movement "as they see it." As such, my concerns with the [[men's rights movement]] article are similar with {{User|BrentNewland}}, (as I'm sure the opinions of {{User|Flyer22}} are the same as other active editors on that page) -- but I should clarify that I differ from {{User|BrentNewland}} in that I see the resolution of this conflict coming from making the tone of [[men's rights movement]] article align better with the tone/balance of the [[feminism]] article, rather than vice versa. You will see that my efforts in this regard are already underway, and that during incidents of reverts I have appropriately explained my actions to promote consensus within the talk page. [[User:Spudst3r|Spudst3r]] ([[User talk:Spudst3r|talk]]) 21:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |