Ceedjee~enwiki (talk | contribs) |
81.73.186.235 (talk) Stop the psyho |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Please add new comments below.''' |
'''Please add new comments below.''' |
||
'''==ChrisO is psychopath seriously ill on the Net== |
|||
Important warning. Do not count ChirsO as objective since he is in the theory of conspiracy. You can find more on this crazy idiot at www.ChrisO.homo.com''' |
|||
==Archiving suggestion== |
==Archiving suggestion== |
Revision as of 20:39, 23 March 2009
Old discussions now at /Archive 1 / /Archive 2 / /Archive 3 / /Archive 4 / /Archive 5 / /Archive 6 / /Archive 7 / /Archive 8 / /Archive 9 / /Archive 10 / /Archive 11 / /Archive 12 / /Archive 13 / /Archive 14 / /Archive 15 / /Archive 16 / /Archive 17 / /Archive 18 / /Archive 19 / /Archive 20 / /Archive 21 / /Archive 22 / /Archive 23 / /Archive 24
Please add new comments below.
==ChrisO is psychopath seriously ill on the Net==
Important warning. Do not count ChirsO as objective since he is in the theory of conspiracy. You can find more on this crazy idiot at www.ChrisO.homo.com
Archiving suggestion
Hiya, if it's helpful, you can automate your archive listing with this syntax: {{archives|auto=short}} (or if you like the longer format, just use {{archives}}). That'll automatically keep track of your archives for you, and you won't have to keep adding links to new pages. If you'd like, I could also setup a bot for you, which would autoarchive old threads. Up to you though! :) --Elonka 17:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Need guidance re. Arbcom ruling enforcement
You recently left a suggestion on my talk page[1] that I report some Israel / Palestine edit warring, BLP concerns, etc. concerning Historicist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), to WP:AE. I was reluctant because that could be seen as a process fork of an active WP:AN/I report, but no action was taken there so after announcing my intentions, and after the edit war/incivility problem persisted[2] I did file an AE report. Phil Knight opined that the arbitration decision does not apply to BLP articles. Do you think that is the case? If so are there any other things for me to do? Go to 2RR and beyond on the latest BLP vios? File a new arbcom case or ask for Arbcom enforcement / clarification on RFA? I'm kind of stuck right now and I don't want to let editors turn biographies into partisan screeds just because other editors are more tendentious in adding the material than I am in removing it. Wikidemon (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Questions
Hi, I understand you had a problem with User:Brewcrewer statements on my userpage series of personal attacks against other editors and a call to treat Wikipedia as a battlefield. I wasn't familiar with the rules and didn't object/defend his statements at the time, but as a result I've found something you might be interested in: Spotfixer, another by Eleland Jewish and obsessively Zionist admin baited me until he ran out of his 3 reverts on User:Eleland's Talk page.
This is all according to Wikipedia is not a battlefield, which you introduced to me at my arbitration.
Sorting through Eleland's talk page will bring up more discussions similar to the ones posted above. After comparing it to Brew, I thought you might be intrigued as it surpasses any negative/personal attack interpreted there in my opinion.
Let me know what you think!
Wikifan12345 (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Rammstein_inferno.JPG
![File Copyright problem](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Rammstein_inferno.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
IRC
I've lost track of how to get onto the Admin IRC channel, could you email me about it? You can just reply to my email I sent you which I don't think you've read yet. Thanks. dougweller (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
I have nominated Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Sceptre (talk) 04:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Chris! I noticed that you reverted my last edit on Russian submarine K-152 Nerpa (the removal of the infobox). While I believe the section being summarized to be too small to warrant summary by an infobox, I'll concede to your wishes and leave it to be decided by others. I did remove the casualty and injury numbers from the infobox as was discussed in the discussion page. If you'd like to discuss the change, please do so there.
I'm relatively new to Wiki and fully accept the fact that I will make mistakes and be wrong but discussion is the only way I'll learn. If you'd lke to talk more, we can do it here, my talk page, or preferably the Russian submarine K-152 Nerpa discussion page.
Thanks for your time. OlYellerTalktome 08:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
WP:RfArb regarding West Bank vs. Judea and Samaria
I have started a Request for Arbitration regarding the use of northern/southern West Bank vs. Judea and Samaria. Since you have been involved in this debate, I have included you in the request.
Cheers, pedrito - talk - 25.02.2009 09:33
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/West Bank - Judea and Samaria/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Tznkai (talk) 04:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Chris,
In the upcoming J+S ArbCom case, I'm worried Elonka's limited topic ban will be used again to cast undue doubt on my conduct. Since 1) Elonka confirmed it was based on a misunderstanding on her part and 2) she promised to lift or at least reduce it after one week, then forgot about it and went on a Wikibreak, and 3) the stated infraction was first changed, then never specified beyond a vague "based on the recent pattern of reverts, and working your way through several Israel-Palestine articles and making Samaria-related reverts", and 4) the only two Samaria-related reverts I had made in the preceding week [3] were in order to fix problems with claims that were either unsourced [4] or sourced exclusively with highly partisan refs [5], I wonder if and where I can appeal to have the ban lifted? MeteorMaker (talk) 08:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Update: PhilKnight informed me about the proper procedure and the whole affair is now a thing of the past [6]. Will now focus on the ArbCom case. MeteorMaker (talk) 11:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Robert Knox (sailor)
You claimed that he was the first person to bring Indian hemp to England. Would you be so kind as to provide a reliable source for that please. 72.255.26.202 (talk) 12:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Obama conspiracy et al
Sorry about that - you are absolutely right. I've been seeing so much crap today that I've become lazy in reviewing edits. I'm drinking more coffee to compensate. -- Scjessey (talk) 00:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- No problem - coffee should help. I've semi-protected the article for a few days while the fallout from the WND article settles - hopefully that will make your life a bit easier. :-) -- ChrisO (talk) 00:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Some vandalism
Didn't want you to be confused as to why that yellow bar has appeared, so I'm just leaving this to tell you I reverted some talk-page vandalism here (check the history if you're interested). BalkanFever 09:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Ariobarza indef blocked - again
I don't know if you had noticed Amerana (talk · contribs) but a CU has turned up the fact that Amerana was a sockpuppet of Ariobarza. I don't know if anything should be done about subpages of both users, what do you think? dougweller (talk) 10:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
AN/I
Hi,
My suggestion was made to insure neutrality. without going through the hisory of all the incidents I made a suggestion. I am in no way saying that you should incur administrative actions, if you were not involved in editing the article, but to insure neutrality on both sides of the issue, I think it better if at least by consensus, both editors are prevented from editing the topic. I will specify this on the noticeboard. Thoughts? Sephiroth storm (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Question about map
I'm writing a bachelor's thesis about the 2006 Lebanon War, and I would love to include the map you made[7] as an appendix. Unfortunately, my school has a pretty big bias against Wikipedia, so I can't cite it in its current form. I was wondering if you run another another website that I might be able to cite instead? Or even better, if you would be willing to email it to me as an attachment, then I could simply cite it as a 'personal communication.' Or if you have any other ideas, that would be great. Thanks for your time, Maethordaer (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Name of Dalmatian Kristallnacht article
Hi. I see you changed the name of the Kristallnacht article. You say it was without consensus. Taking that into account, I looked over the article history (article original name was Kristallnacht). The name to wich you changed the article was chosen without consensus either, by a Croatian editor. In fact, the only consensus was the name "anti-serb pogrom" which was arrived to with participation of both sides. I hope you can check that. Accordingly, I moved the article to that name, to which both sides agreed after a long discussion during proposed deletion, as you can easily check (no such discussio was done before dumbed down title "riots" for what is widely known in Yugoslavia as Dalmatian Kristallnacht) . —Preceding unsigned comment added by OdDjerdapa (talk • contribs) 10:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- To make things easier for you to review here is list of changes:
[8] Changed by Croatian user DrGonzo, per agreement with Serbian side, to pogrom - there was discussion in fact, as you can see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OdDjerdapa (talk • contribs) 10:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- You can't cite a discussion that took place in 2006 (!) as evidence of a current consensus. If you want to change the name, you need to explain why you want to change it, and you need to get the support of other editors. I suggest adding your arguments to Talk:1991 Dalmatian anti-Serb riots and adding a link to the discussion on Wikipedia:Requested moves and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Croatia, so that other editors can contribute. -- ChrisO (talk) 10:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- The current title was changed to next year (2007) by Croatian user Joy [9]; the support came from 2 other Croatian users, but was disputed soon after - there was no consensus in fact. Now a pro-Croatian POV title remains. As you can see from the article history, a war over the title name was present ever since the compromise name was changed. There is no current "consensus" as Serbian side never agreed to the present title. In 2006, after the deletion discussion, there were much more editors involved, and the title "pogrom" was in fact proposed by a Croatian editor as a compromise from Kristallnacht. So, it was agreed by both sides, who were aware of the title, including the people who later changed it. After the compromise from 2006, a year passes, and editors go away, and title is quietly changed. Since then it has been changed back and forth, so it is hardly a concensus name at this point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OdDjerdapa (talk • contribs) 10:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Joy is not croatian user but wikipedia administrator.
- Article history is having 3 confirmed puppets (user:Roramaster, user:Roremaster, user:Mylan) and 1 puppet master (user:Purger) which has tried to change article name. all in all situation is calm (if you look other articles about Croatian history)--Rjecina (talk) 21:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know - I see OdDjerdapa has now been blocked for sockpuppetry. I suspected something like that was going on; thanks for confirming it. -- ChrisO (talk) 21:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- The current title was changed to next year (2007) by Croatian user Joy [9]; the support came from 2 other Croatian users, but was disputed soon after - there was no consensus in fact. Now a pro-Croatian POV title remains. As you can see from the article history, a war over the title name was present ever since the compromise name was changed. There is no current "consensus" as Serbian side never agreed to the present title. In 2006, after the deletion discussion, there were much more editors involved, and the title "pogrom" was in fact proposed by a Croatian editor as a compromise from Kristallnacht. So, it was agreed by both sides, who were aware of the title, including the people who later changed it. After the compromise from 2006, a year passes, and editors go away, and title is quietly changed. Since then it has been changed back and forth, so it is hardly a concensus name at this point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OdDjerdapa (talk • contribs) 10:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Darko Trifunovic
Chris, Trifunovic is a NPF and a minor one at that. He does not rate an article in Wikipedia, he is not a policy maker nor in the news, the article about him contains footnotes that go nowhere and do not mention his name. This is a pure case of making ants into elephants. However, the guy is having a hard time making a living ebcuase of the Wikipedia article about his minor association with news events. Please take an objective look at the matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Resistk (talk • contribs) 14:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Via Egnatia Article
Chris, you deleted my contribution to the entry Via Egnatia. Why? It was about the most important initiative aiming at the preservation of the remains of the Via Egnatia. I think it should be mentioned in any article on this road. One could at least put a link to www.viaegnatiafoundation.eu in the article. comment added by Brui0976 —Preceding undated comment added 20:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC).
Chris, Great map. When you get a chance, though, could you add a few dots, and change a name. Ideally, we would have a couple of dots up in Scotland, one inland in South Africa for the tower at Fort Beaufort. and one off the coast by Jakarta. (I have just added the little I could find about a Dutch East India Company Martello tower there.) The Spanish towers are at Minorca, or at least that's what the leading (and only) article I have found calls it, rather than Mallorca, and so that's the term I am using for them. Again, great map, and thanks. Acad Ronin (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Tarawet.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tarawet.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
insanity
Hi ChrisO,
Would you mind, as sysop, removing these comments from the history of my talk page (not just delete them) ?
Thank you for your help... Ceedjee (talk) 06:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)