Coercorash (talk | contribs) →I didn't started edit war: new section |
Dispute closed. |
||
Line 72:
:Hi, OlEnglish.You are being very rude with me and treating me like a vandal.What's the problem if I will collect information about different rights?I want to know about different rights so that I can make my self illegible for those rights.As, we had discussed, I am not going to apply for these rights now-a-days.I want to apply for these rights when I'm little bit experienced with Wikipedia.So, Stop treating me very rudely.[[User:themaxviwe|<font color="Orange" face="Gigi">'''Max Viwe'''</font>]] | [[User talk:themaxviwe|<font color="Green" face= "Comic sans MS">Wanna chat with me? </font>]] 05:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
==Question==
|
Revision as of 08:46, 27 June 2010
As ur daughter ...
Thanks for the help, again. Did u adopt me as a nubilian princess editor? Bridgetttttttebabblepoop 12:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hiya! Well, I do not go in for the official 'adoption' programme (I'm afraid of the poop!) but I am always happy to try and help anyone, as best I can. So, if you ever need help with anything, feel free to ask me, right here. Cheers! Chzz ► 12:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Beach Nourishment COI Edit
Hey Chzz, thanks for your comments on my edit on the discussion page of the "Beach Nourishment" entry on Wikipedia. I made some revisions and created a user-space draft like you asked. Could you review it for me and provide some feedback? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Weissmax25/Beach_Nourishment
Thanks.
Weissmax25 (talk) 19:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hi. the proposed article still has a number of problems. Per WP:COI, I suggest that you edit other articles instead.
- Issues with the proposal include (but are not limited to);
- three commonly accepted methods - accorting to whom? (see WP:V)
- All three of these approaches have advantages and disadvantages - according to whom?
- However, no one solution can be applied in all situations. - according to whom?
- This article concentrates on... - meta-information; this is not encyclopaedic. Just state facts.
- Re. section "Response Alternatives On An Eroding Beach" - this offers a biased view, opinion, not fact. For example,
- There is a growing body of evidence - where? Prove that it is 'growing'.
- nearshore breakwaters, if filled with sand, will not have a negative impacts on the littoral drift system. - according to perhaps that one source. Do others disagree?
- Problems with vague terms, per WP:WEASEL, WP:PEACOCK etc. - Managed Retreat - A second option is retreat as the shoreline erodes. This option has been exercised very infrequently along the United States shoreline; however, a number of examples exist. Retreat the most appropriate option in areas of high erosion and in the presence of small economic revenue base. Many, but not all areas of high erosion are due to human activities.
- And so it goes on. "Sand or “Borrow” Sources" says, source of suitable material for a particular project depends upon... - opinion, not fact.
- The most important borrow material characteristic is ditto
I hope this gives some indication of the problems with conflict of interest. I highly recommend editing other articles. Best, Chzz ► 02:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Question About Submitting Draft
(Loreensherman (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)). Hi Chzz, thanks for your advice about posting on Wikipedia. I certainly want to stay within Wikipedia's parameters and guidelines. I am confused because my article for Formulaic Communication in the 21st Century was moved to another talk page under a draft... Uncertain as to what that means. Please explain. (Loreensherman (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)).
- On 21 June, you first created Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Four Tests Formulaic Communication Passes in Economics - that is still there; it is a 'declined' submission, but that does not preclude further edits, and asking us to re-check it.
- It would appear that you created an article re. "Continual Progression of Entrepreneurism" on your user talk page, and I then moved that to a subpage - that is now in User talk:Loreensherman/draft one, which you have edited and resubmitted here. Most of that article did not display, because of the incorrect reference format, which I have just fixed, here. It still, currently, contains almost entirely quoted material, rather than encyclopaedic fact; please do read other articles for ideas, as suggested on your talk page, and ask for a further review when it is more appropriate. Best, Chzz ► 03:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Chzz, It's time to become an Administrator
Chzz, do it! And please don't give me past viewpoints and stuff..... ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 13:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly? It might be a little too soon yet.. but I'd say he does have a fairly good chance at succeeding at this point. But it could be a little risky.. -- Ϫ 01:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed; a meer 15,000 non-auto drama-free edits, it's far too soon to think about. Chzz ► 03:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Chzz, man, sarcasm aside - just go ahead now. There are admins and there are admins, and there should be you now. You've done the call duty already. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 03:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed; a meer 15,000 non-auto drama-free edits, it's far too soon to think about. Chzz ► 03:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Your rights.
- Hi, I've noted that you have abusefilter and accountcreator rights.I want to know what are they and how to apply for them.Please help me.Regards.Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 14:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
- MaxViwe, we chatted about this when you emailed me remember? Instead of trying to collect rights for yourself that you don't even need, try focusing on editing articles instead. -- Ϫ 01:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, OlEnglish.
- I was going to write more of an explanation here, but in light of the above, I merely suggest that full details of these rights are avaialble at Wikipedia:Edit filter and Wikipedia:Account creator. Chzz ► 03:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, OlEnglish.You are being very rude with me and treating me like a vandal.What's the problem if I will collect information about different rights?I want to know about different rights so that I can make my self illegible for those rights.As, we had discussed, I am not going to apply for these rights now-a-days.I want to apply for these rights when I'm little bit experienced with Wikipedia.So, Stop treating me very rudely.Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 05:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Question
- Hi, I want to ask you that can a user who don't have an Wikipedia account and contributes using IP address create an article?Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 05:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I didn't started edit war
It were User:Urduboy and User:MatthewVanitas,so called neutral editors,who started the edit-war. That made me quote this:
- IF majority of online users (2us1) can decide the truth in real world than it means that The day of Judgement IS NEAR.