m Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:David.Mestel/Archive 07 |
m Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:David.Mestel/Archive 07 |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
See [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_01|Archive 1]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_02|Archive 2]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_03|Archive 3]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_04|Archive 4]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_05|Archive 5]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_06|Archive 6]] and [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_07|Archive 7]]. |
See [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_01|Archive 1]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_02|Archive 2]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_03|Archive 3]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_04|Archive 4]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_05|Archive 5]], [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_06|Archive 6]] and [[User_talk:David.Mestel/Archive_07|Archive 7]]. |
||
== Hi == |
|||
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Face-smile-big.svg|left|60px|]] |
|||
{{{1|[[User:Ignatzmice|Ignatzmice]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ignatzmice|talk]]</sup>}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! {{{2|}}} |
|||
</div><!-- Template:smile2 --> |
|||
10:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== just a clarification == |
== just a clarification == |
Revision as of 15:28, 2 March 2007
See Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6 and Archive 7.
just a clarification
Are you reffering to the evidence section specificly or the statements section? I do release that I indeed did expand too much on the statement section.But in any case I've just gone back and cut down on the evidence section.
I just want to make sure which section I should cut down further on.Thanks.--Nadirali نادرالی
- I've just reduced the size/length and number of diffs - is it satisfactory? Rama's arrow 16:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Sure,sure anywhere is fine with me as long as the arbitrators and other users can see it.Thanks.--Nadirali نادرالی
India-Pakistan Evidence
Hi, I haven't had time to add my evidence, but plan to do so today. Will that be OK? I will keep the text to under 1000 words. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Re: India-Pakistan evidence
Is the reduction of evidence important? I believe these are the little things which over a longer period of time cause furstrations and, therefore, all these little things should be included in the evidence to draw a broader picture of trends of sneaky violations. Szhaider 23:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
WP:SIGN arb reports
I think you should update the arb reports as the are in progress as it seems as though you follow the cases as they occur anyway. Eg, the Starwood case, some of the parties have been banned as sockpuppets for a month now, but it still has "Party X ....." in the present tense. I guess I would be more inclined to read the reports (supposing I wasn't an arbitrator) if it provided more of a running call of the action :) (I tend to read the new features, but perhaps that is my personal preference for writing showing). Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
proposal may need to be moved
Hi David,I made a proposal in the enforcement section in the workshop of the case and an arbitrator indicated that it may need to be moved to the principals section.Could you please take a look and maybe move it if necessary?Thanks alot.--Nadirali نادرالی
Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Arb
Is it OK to move some of the longer and more pointless arguments to the talk page, leaving notes saying where to find them? David Mestel(Talk) 15:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Civil discussion of the proposals is always welcome. Discussion that wanders from the main point can be moved to the talk pages, although in some cases it may be better simply to delete. {{Clerk-Note}} is a useful way of tagging comments made in your "official" role. I tend not to use it too much as the participants usually know who I am and what my role is in the case; but of course if people start objecting to your actions you can use it as needed. Thatcher131 21:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Pipe trick
Hey, if you ever get to screwing around with that, you should also make it so that [[../Foo]], using the pipe trick, would display as Foo, not "../Foo" (try it on a sub-page; it won't work on this page). This would help out with the Signpost immensely. Ral315 » 07:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
T.R.O.L.L.
Thank you as always for writing up the ArbCom case report in the Signpost. I would like to suggest that references to allegations of stalking, harassment, or any other forms of off-wiki misconduct should generally be omitted from these write-ups. In one of the pending cases, a workshop proposal was by one of the parties that there be an off-wiki investigation that would not have been appropriate, and when I pointed this out he observed that the Signpost had already publicized the allegation of off-wiki conduct that he wanted investigated. It would be best to avoid this situation in the future. If you have any questions about this, please e-mail me. Thank you very much. Newyorkbrad 21:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
>Kamope< Talk · Sign Here 00:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Pakistan-India arbcomm case
Its pretty much decided what is going to happen to me. So I just wanted to ask for a quick and urgent favour.
Could you point out to the committee that I am on a shared IP used by many people. If my account only could be banned, and if anyone discovers I am editing again, they can ban the IP. Thank you. --Unre4Lﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ UT 05:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)