See Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6 and Archive 7.
proposal may need to be moved
Hi David,I made a proposal in the enforcement section in the workshop of the case and an arbitrator indicated that it may need to be moved to the principals section.Could you please take a look and maybe move it if necessary?Thanks alot.--Nadirali نادرالی
Arb
Is it OK to move some of the longer and more pointless arguments to the talk page, leaving notes saying where to find them? David Mestel(Talk) 15:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Civil discussion of the proposals is always welcome. Discussion that wanders from the main point can be moved to the talk pages, although in some cases it may be better simply to delete. {{Clerk-Note}} is a useful way of tagging comments made in your "official" role. I tend not to use it too much as the participants usually know who I am and what my role is in the case; but of course if people start objecting to your actions you can use it as needed. Thatcher131 21:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Pipe trick
Hey, if you ever get to screwing around with that, you should also make it so that [[../Foo]], using the pipe trick, would display as Foo, not "../Foo" (try it on a sub-page; it won't work on this page). This would help out with the Signpost immensely. Ral315 » 07:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
T.R.O.L.L.
Thank you as always for writing up the ArbCom case report in the Signpost. I would like to suggest that references to allegations of stalking, harassment, or any other forms of off-wiki misconduct should generally be omitted from these write-ups. In one of the pending cases, a workshop proposal was by one of the parties that there be an off-wiki investigation that would not have been appropriate, and when I pointed this out he observed that the Signpost had already publicized the allegation of off-wiki conduct that he wanted investigated. It would be best to avoid this situation in the future. If you have any questions about this, please e-mail me. Thank you very much. Newyorkbrad 21:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
>Kamope< Talk · Sign Here 00:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Pakistan-India arbcomm case
Its pretty much decided what is going to happen to me. So I just wanted to ask for a quick and urgent favour.
Could you point out to the committee that I am on a shared IP used by many people. If my account only could be banned, and if anyone discovers I am editing again, they can ban the IP. Thank you. --Unre4Lﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ UT 05:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
quick request
Hey there David,I have a quick request.I just need you to let the arbitrators know that recent evidence from outside users has just come in on the evidence section on the case.I also posted some new evidence a few days ago.(From the looks of it,they haven't checked anything there).
Some new users have just posted there as well,so please do inform the arbitrators. That's all I needed to say.
Thanks alot.--Nadirali نادرالی
Closing RfAr India-Pakistan
Per discussion on WP:AC/CN, you should go ahead and close Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan at the appropriate time after it has 4 net votes to close (it's at 3/0 right now). It would probably be best if you could do it at a time when Thatcher131 or Cowman109 or I is online so we can implement the bans at the same time. Let us know on the noticeboard if you'll be around tonight or tomorrow morning after the 4th vote comes in. Regards, Newyorkbrad 19:52, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- David, good job. Congratulations on your first case! Thatcher131 22:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Confirming what I told you at the time, you did an excellent job, and thanks for your help. Regards, Newyorkbrad 23:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, all, and especially to NYB for his help. David Mestel(Talk) 07:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Urgent last request- Please reply
My last request would me for you to disengage the autoblock.
Please try to understand. This is only my temporary IP. I dont mind you banning my real IP. I can promise you I wont be editing at all. Please also take into consideration the "offences". I am not a vandal. I really wish you to take my last request seriously. I am asking you as a friend, as I have always had my best intentions on Wikipedia, and I dont deserve a dishonourable discharge. please let me know what you can do for me. --Unre4Lﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ UT 23:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- There was no autoblock applied. Thatcher131 22:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)