Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→re: Obama '08: edit warring |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
I think those are reasonable edits. I actually would like to separate that subsection into different subsections, as placing the widespread controversy over Obama's membership at TUCC in the same section as rumors and urban legends inserts a structural POV issue. But taking out redundant spoonfeeding is reasonable. [[User:Trilemma|Trilemma]] ([[User talk:Trilemma|talk]]) 21:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
I think those are reasonable edits. I actually would like to separate that subsection into different subsections, as placing the widespread controversy over Obama's membership at TUCC in the same section as rumors and urban legends inserts a structural POV issue. But taking out redundant spoonfeeding is reasonable. [[User:Trilemma|Trilemma]] ([[User talk:Trilemma|talk]]) 21:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Heads up that a few editors are trying to blank a section on the Obama campaign page. [[User:Trilemma|Trilemma]] ([[User talk:Trilemma|talk]]) 22:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
:Heads up that a few editors are trying to blank a section on the Obama campaign page. [[User:Trilemma|Trilemma]] ([[User talk:Trilemma|talk]]) 22:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
::You are engaging in an [[WP:EW|edit war]] over the [[Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008]], having now made the same contentious edits five times in a row over reversions by three different editors. Please do not edit war on an important article like this. As you no doubt know, edit warring may incur administrative intervention including possible short-term blocks or article protection. If you wish to try to establish a consensus for these edits please do so on the talk page. Thanks, [[User:Wikidemo|Wikidemo]] ([[User talk:Wikidemo|talk]]) 08:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:20, 18 June 2008
thank spam
User:Stephen Ewen
Hi, I've responded to you at my talk page. Best, Happyme22 (talk) 21:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
re: Obama '08
I think those are reasonable edits. I actually would like to separate that subsection into different subsections, as placing the widespread controversy over Obama's membership at TUCC in the same section as rumors and urban legends inserts a structural POV issue. But taking out redundant spoonfeeding is reasonable. Trilemma (talk) 21:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Heads up that a few editors are trying to blank a section on the Obama campaign page. Trilemma (talk) 22:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- You are engaging in an edit war over the Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008, having now made the same contentious edits five times in a row over reversions by three different editors. Please do not edit war on an important article like this. As you no doubt know, edit warring may incur administrative intervention including possible short-term blocks or article protection. If you wish to try to establish a consensus for these edits please do so on the talk page. Thanks, Wikidemo (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)