Byrgenwulf (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
I asked you not to edit that page but to complain on my [[User talk:Hillman|user talk page]] if you had a concern. I don't agree that the material you removed was a copyright vio, but I am also seeking guidance from admins. Please [[WP:AGF]] and recognize that this takes place in the context of cruft control at WP. Ironically, you seem to have overlooked the fact that these pages are related to my attempt (still in very early states) to formulate, propose and establish new policies related to digging and cruft control. Specifically, I feel that WP needs a clear policy on "digging" and when it is and is not appropriate, since this is clearly a difficult area to navigate without guidance, and also touches on subjects which many Wikipedians feel very strongly about. Please continue at my [[User talk:Hillman|user talk page]] because [[User:Tim Smith]] strongly desires not to fragment the discussion. TIA ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 22:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC) |
I asked you not to edit that page but to complain on my [[User talk:Hillman|user talk page]] if you had a concern. I don't agree that the material you removed was a copyright vio, but I am also seeking guidance from admins. Please [[WP:AGF]] and recognize that this takes place in the context of cruft control at WP. Ironically, you seem to have overlooked the fact that these pages are related to my attempt (still in very early states) to formulate, propose and establish new policies related to digging and cruft control. Specifically, I feel that WP needs a clear policy on "digging" and when it is and is not appropriate, since this is clearly a difficult area to navigate without guidance, and also touches on subjects which many Wikipedians feel very strongly about. Please continue at my [[User talk:Hillman|user talk page]] because [[User:Tim Smith]] strongly desires not to fragment the discussion. TIA ---[[User:Hillman|CH]] 22:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
:DrL, you may be interested in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Hillman/Dig this discussion], where Hillman's "dig pages" are up for deletion. Just thought it would be fair to let you know. [[User:Byrgenwulf|Byrgenwulf]] 11:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:20, 29 July 2006
DrL's Message Center
Please come by, to say "hi" :)
(Messages are deleted every 24h or when message box is full)
Thanks for stopping by!
Message Box
Please see Wikipedia:Removing_warnings#Vandalism. Removing warnings from your talk page is not the recommended way to do things. Best regards. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice. I've replaced the only official warning that I received. I will be sure to retain any recent, non-libelous, relevant and accurate warnings - thx! DrL 16:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- You're welcome. There's a process, woolly and vague though, for getting rid of them, at the link above. The fact is that lots of people remove warnings, but it's probably best not to court trouble. Enjoy what's left of the weekend ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions[1] made on July 17 2006 (UTC) to Cognitive-Theoretic Model_of_the_Universe
![]() |
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. |
Please note that I was reverting mass deletes/vandalism (examine history for further details). It was my understanding that the 3RR rule does not apply in such cases. Please explain your action. Thank you. DrL 17:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please read WP:3RR more carefully. Only blatant vandalism counts, which this wasn't - it appears to be a perfectly sensible argument about what should be on the page William M. Connolley 17:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Completely disagree. DrL 16:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Digging
I asked you not to edit that page but to complain on my user talk page if you had a concern. I don't agree that the material you removed was a copyright vio, but I am also seeking guidance from admins. Please WP:AGF and recognize that this takes place in the context of cruft control at WP. Ironically, you seem to have overlooked the fact that these pages are related to my attempt (still in very early states) to formulate, propose and establish new policies related to digging and cruft control. Specifically, I feel that WP needs a clear policy on "digging" and when it is and is not appropriate, since this is clearly a difficult area to navigate without guidance, and also touches on subjects which many Wikipedians feel very strongly about. Please continue at my user talk page because User:Tim Smith strongly desires not to fragment the discussion. TIA ---CH 22:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- DrL, you may be interested in this discussion, where Hillman's "dig pages" are up for deletion. Just thought it would be fair to let you know. Byrgenwulf 11:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)