Why not take the original CTMU article to Wikinfo, which promotes a "sympathetic point of view" policy for every article? Just a thought!--Byrgenwulf 11:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
I did not write the original CTMU article and don't know who did (other than that his name is Tim Smith). He did a good job, though! Also, I don't think it needs a sympathetic POV, just a neutral one. Langan has written a lot of material and people who follow his work read it very closely and repeatedly. DrL 13:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
DrL, do not edit my comments and change the words that I wrote (changing "socks" to "others"). If I say something you don't agree with, then by all means disagree with me, but do not edit my comments. I see you edited "IQ Prophet's" words as well. His spelling. Why not make sure you can spell properly before editing other people? If they are, in fact, other people. --Byrgenwulf 16:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I don't have a clue who IQ Prophet is. Didn't mean to offend and did not use "socks". Please don't make such accusations. Thx DrL 16:55, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Mediation
Greetings. Byrgenwulf has requested mediation concerning the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe article. If you'd like to participate, you can find the discussion here: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-13 CTMU. Thanks. SynergeticMaggot 08:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I have joined the page some time ago and am still waiting for others to join the mediation process instead of vandalizing the CTMU article. DrL 15:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --ScienceApologist 14:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Please join the mediation (link above) and refrain from massive deletes. DrL 14:26, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please discuss your edits on the talkpage. --ScienceApologist 14:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- You have been reported for violating WP:3RR here. --ScienceApologist 15:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that, thus far, I am the only one following the mediation process wrt the CTMU page. The 3RR rule does not hold in cases of vandalism or sudden mass deletion. DrL 15:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)