Content deleted Content added
suggestbot |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Should NPOV ever be used to remove cited "oppressive" points of view? |
Should NPOV ever be used to remove cited "oppressive" points of view? |
||
[[User:Endercase|Endercase]] ([[User talk:Endercase#top|talk]]) |
[[User:Endercase|Endercase]] ([[User talk:Endercase#top|talk]]) |
||
{{User:SuggestBot/suggest}} |
Revision as of 14:02, 5 March 2017
Headings and links
Welcome back to Wikipedia! This is just a quick note to point out that the wiki guidelines discourage the inclusion of links within headings especially when only part of the heading is linked. See MOS:HEAD. The subject of the link has often been mentioned and linked earlier in the article (and in this case probably should not be linked again) or will be mentioned early in the section and can be linked at that point. — Jpacobb (talk) 18:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Even in a talk page? Man y'all are hardcore. I mean I guess it is here forever. Thanks for the heads-up!Endercase (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
NPOV thoughts
What is the definition here for a valid point of view? Should NPOV ever be used to remove cited "oppressive" points of view? Endercase (talk)