Fasach Nua (talk | contribs) |
Fasach Nua (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::I had not been on wiki between first and second messages and would encourage you to check activity before leaving follow up messages. I have had a superficial look over this article and for the most part it is fine. I have concerns about [[:File:Collared_Lizard_Albuquerque_NM_Preview.JPG]] regarding the email (not huge concerns, but concerns none the less), [[:File:Cnemidophorus-ThreeSpecies.jpg]] is fine, it is basically CC with attributions, [[:File:Reptiles.jpg]] has serious problems, it is derived from four different images, and the licensing for all must be compatible with the one used on the montage, this is currently not the case! On [[WP:MOS]] issues it is generally best practice to have images with faces look into the text, and for lists it is much tidier if all images use the same aspect ratio. [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua#top|talk]]) 14:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC) |
::I had not been on wiki between first and second messages and would encourage you to check activity before leaving follow up messages. I have had a superficial look over this article and for the most part it is fine. I have concerns about [[:File:Collared_Lizard_Albuquerque_NM_Preview.JPG]] regarding the email (not huge concerns, but concerns none the less), [[:File:Cnemidophorus-ThreeSpecies.jpg]] is fine, it is basically CC with attributions, [[:File:Reptiles.jpg]] has serious problems, it is derived from four different images, and the licensing for all must be compatible with the one used on the montage, this is currently not the case! On [[WP:MOS]] issues it is generally best practice to have images with faces look into the text, and for lists it is much tidier if all images use the same aspect ratio. [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua#top|talk]]) 14:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::If you are having trouble tracking images back to their source I would recommend [www.tineye.com] [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua#top|talk]]) 01:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
:::If you are having trouble tracking images back to their source I would recommend [http://www.tineye.com tineye] [[User:Fasach Nua|Fasach Nua]] ([[User talk:Fasach Nua#top|talk]]) 01:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:49, 24 January 2011
File:Turtle_crossing_sign_JPG.jpeg
Could you comment over at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Turtle crossing sign JPG.jpeg about this image. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the late response; yep, it checks out. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 19:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Your tag was reviewed and your concern was dismissed by two separate editors. Do not edit war. If you would like to stop wasting everyone's time with drive by tagging, and demonstrate that you are actually acting in good faith, then post your rationale on my talk page and we can discuss it. Before you do, I would suggest you actually read the article, because at this point, I very strongly doubt you have. Resolute 23:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
History of Sesame Street FAC
Hi Fasach,
I wanted to let you know that I moved the discussion you were involved in regarding WP:Featured article candidates/History of Sesame Street/archive1 to its talk page, as per Sandy's recommendation. I moved your oppose, too, but returned it after I was told that I shouldn't have done it. I was also told to ping you, although as it turns out, it's not going to make much difference because it looks like Sandy's going to archive it because of lack of consensus. I also wanted to ask your opinion about an idea I had regarding the article's images. I've suggested that instead of the images being too few or not high enough quality, that we just not have any images at all. Does a featured article, especially one about the article's subject, *need* to have images? What do you think? Be honest, now! ;) Christine (talk) 22:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Image assistance
Am working on a page now that has a lot of images. Appreciate any advice on what to look for in terms of questionable stuff. See here: [1] TCO (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- HEY! That was a serious request for help. Would like a gander at these images with a bunch of different licences, and maybe learn myself how to think through some of these issues as well. Also, in particular wonder of this issue of when something is listed as government derived, but it's not really obvious the source (govt document or current web precense). TCO (talk) 21:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- I had not been on wiki between first and second messages and would encourage you to check activity before leaving follow up messages. I have had a superficial look over this article and for the most part it is fine. I have concerns about File:Collared_Lizard_Albuquerque_NM_Preview.JPG regarding the email (not huge concerns, but concerns none the less), File:Cnemidophorus-ThreeSpecies.jpg is fine, it is basically CC with attributions, File:Reptiles.jpg has serious problems, it is derived from four different images, and the licensing for all must be compatible with the one used on the montage, this is currently not the case! On WP:MOS issues it is generally best practice to have images with faces look into the text, and for lists it is much tidier if all images use the same aspect ratio. Fasach Nua (talk) 14:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- If you are having trouble tracking images back to their source I would recommend tineye Fasach Nua (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- I had not been on wiki between first and second messages and would encourage you to check activity before leaving follow up messages. I have had a superficial look over this article and for the most part it is fine. I have concerns about File:Collared_Lizard_Albuquerque_NM_Preview.JPG regarding the email (not huge concerns, but concerns none the less), File:Cnemidophorus-ThreeSpecies.jpg is fine, it is basically CC with attributions, File:Reptiles.jpg has serious problems, it is derived from four different images, and the licensing for all must be compatible with the one used on the montage, this is currently not the case! On WP:MOS issues it is generally best practice to have images with faces look into the text, and for lists it is much tidier if all images use the same aspect ratio. Fasach Nua (talk) 14:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)