Hallward's Ghost (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1154076151 by Orlando Davis (talk) Please don't remove conversations from my talkpage. That is at my discretion, not yours Tag: Undo |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) →The Signpost: 8 June 2024: new section Tag: |
||
(61 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<br> |
<br> |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
| algo = old( |
| algo = old(14d) |
||
| archive = User talk:Hallward's Ghost/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s |
| archive = User talk:Hallward's Ghost/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s |
||
| archiveheader = {{MonthlyArchive}} |
| archiveheader = {{MonthlyArchive}} |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User talk:Hallward's Ghost/Archives]] |
[[User talk:Hallward's Ghost/Archives]] |
||
⚫ | |||
== Nomination of [[:Katie Beth Hall]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Katie Beth Hall]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Beth Hall]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
⚫ | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
|||
*{{flagicon image|Transgender Pride flag.svg|link=Transgender}} [[User:Sammi Brie|Sammi Brie]], with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was |
|||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Cerebral726|Cerebral726]] ([[User talk:Cerebral726|talk]]) 17:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*{{flagicon image|Flag of Mars.svg|link=Mars}} [[User:Thebiguglyalien|Thebiguglyalien]], with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points. |
|||
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition. |
|||
:I wanted to preempt any feeling of this as an attack by saying that I truly did not add the tag due to any "I don't like it" reason, as you stated in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Katie_Beth_Hall&diff=prev&oldid=1149188319&diffmode=source this edit]. You will see I attempted to improve the article in a number of ways. After some research, I found it doubtful that the sources available meet the requirements of [[WP:SIGCOV]]. Tagging the page was an effort to see if anyone else could find more clear example of notability. Since you removed that tag twice over, I presumed you agreed there were no further sources available that could demonstrate notability, so I proposed it for deletion as described above. [[User:Cerebral726|Cerebral726]] ([[User talk:Cerebral726|talk]]) 18:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::This is definitely an attack, since you are nominating it to avoid 3RR for replacing a silly tag that doesn't belong on that article stub. That stub is far more well-referenced than many (maybe most?) of the current actor stubs. Please stop this deletionist silliness. ''Kevin''<sup><small> [[User:Hallward's Ghost|Hallward's Ghost]]</small></sup> <sup><small>([[User talk:Hallward's Ghost|Let's talk]])</small></sup> 20:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]]. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> |
|||
⚫ | |||
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. [[User:Sturmvogel 66|Sturmvogel 66]] ([[User talk:Sturmvogel 66|talk]]), and [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) |
|||
⚫ | <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/ |
||
<!-- Message sent by User: |
<!-- Message sent by User:Cwmhiraeth@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send&oldid=1172692052 --> |
||
== WikiCup 2024 May newsletter == |
|||
⚫ | |||
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014. |
|||
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points: |
|||
* {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant15|Sammi Brie}} with 707 points, mostly from 45 [[WP:GAN|good article nomination]] reviews and 12 [[WP:GA|good articles]]s about radio and television; |
|||
* {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant15|Generalissima}} with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 [[WP:DYK|did you know]] nominations about coinage and history; |
|||
* {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant15|SounderBruce}} with 552 points, mostly from a [[WP:FA|featured article]] about the [[2020 Seattle Sounders FC season]], three [[WP:FL|featured lists]], and two good articles; |
|||
* {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant15|BennyOnTheLoose}} with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player [[John Pulman]], two featured lists, and one good article; |
|||
* {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant15|voorts}} with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles ([[Well he would, wouldn't he?]] and [[Cora Agnes Benneson]]) and three good articles. |
|||
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2024/Round 2|here]]. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 [[WP:ITN|in the news]] credits and at least 200 [[WP:DYK|did you know]] credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to [[Wikipedia:featured topics|featured topics]] and [[Wikipedia:good topics|good topics]]. |
|||
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed]]. |
|||
⚫ | If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring|this page]]. Further questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]] and the judges ({{User|Cwmhiraeth}}, {{User|Epicgenius}}, and {{User|Frostly}}) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
<!-- Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023 --> |
|||
{| style="float:right;margin:0 0 0 2em;padding=0;" |
{| style="float:right;margin:0 0 0 2em;padding=0;" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|align=center|[[File:US Mountain West.png|200px|border|link=meta:Wikimedia United States Coalition]] |
|align=center|[[File:US Mountain West.png|200px|border|link=meta:Wikimedia United States Coalition]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|align=center|[[ |
|align=center|[[Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West|<span style="vertical-align:text-top;font-size:10pt;font-weight:bold;line-height:0.6em;">Wikimedia US Mountain West</span>]] |
||
|} |
|} |
||
[[Wikimedia movement|Wikimedians]] of the [[United States|U.S.]] [[Mountain states|Mountain West]] will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May |
[[Wikimedia movement|Wikimedians]] of the [[United States|U.S.]] [[Mountain states|Mountain West]] will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at [https://meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd]. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the [[Wikimedia movement]] is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/2024-05-14|our meeting page]] for details. |
||
⚫ | <span style="font-size:75%;line-height:0em;";>If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were: |
|||
*{{flagicon|Byzantine Empire}} [[User:Iazyges|Iazyges]] (1040) with three FAs on [[Martinus (son of Heraclius)|Byzantine emperors]], and lots of bonus points. |
|||
*{{flagicon image|Royal standard of England (1406–1603).svg|link=Dual monarchy of England and France}} [[User:Unlimitedlead|Unlimitedlead]] (847), with three FAs on [[Government of Macedonia (ancient kingdom)|ancient history]], one GA and nine reviews. |
|||
⚫ | |||
*{{flagicon image|Flag_of_Esperanto.svg|link=Esperanto}} [[User:BennyOnTheLoose|BennyOnTheLoose]] (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on [[1981 World Snooker Championship|snooker]], six GAs and seven reviews. |
|||
*{{flagicon|Germany}} [[user:FrB.TG|FrB.TG]] (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga [[Telephone (song)|song]] and a mass of bonus points. |
|||
⚫ | |||
Other notable performances were put in by {{flagicon image|Transgender Pride flag.svg|link=Transgender}} [[User:Sammi Brie|Sammi Brie]], {{flagicon image|Flag of Mars.svg|link=Mars}} [[User:Thebiguglyalien|Thebiguglyalien]], {{flagicon image|Cat in console.png}} [[User:MyCatIsAChonk|MyCatIsAChonk]], {{flagicon|Chicago}} [[User:PCN02WPS|PCN02WPS]], and {{flagicon|London}} [[User:AirshipJungleman29|AirshipJungleman29]]. |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
== Rescheduled online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West 05/21/2024 == |
|||
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. |
|||
The online meeting of the [[Wikimedia movement|Wikimedians]] of the [[United States|U.S.]] [[Mountain states|Mountain West]] originally scheduled for May 14 has been rescheduled for 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 21, 2024, at [https://meet.google.com/wbg-wgws-sbj meet.google.com/wbg-wgws-sbj]. Please see [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/2024-05-21|our new meeting page]] for details. |
|||
⚫ | If you |
||
⚫ | |||
<span style="font-size:75%;line-height:0em;";>If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our '''{{nobreak|[[Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list]]}}'''. Thanks.</span> |
|||
⚫ | |||
- [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 05:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/ |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-05-16}} </div><!--Volume 20, Issue 7--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2024-05-16|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 10:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:JPxG/SPS]]) --></div></div> |
||
== Guillermo Rojas Bazan. == |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1223040870 --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
Please help me improve the page. I am sure that you are much more experienced than I am. What could I do to make it better? I do appreciate your help. Thank you! [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-06-08}} </div><!--Volume 20, Issue 8--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2024-06-08|Single-page]] * [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] * [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script ([[User:JPxG/SPS]]) --></div></div> |
||
:Thanks for responding. My first recommendation would be to click around in the links that Geoff left in the Welcome message on your talkpage. That will help you understand what the main issue with articles that sound a bit like advertisements is. You should also take some time to read through a few biographical articles, to see what a neutral point of view looks like in article space. You can also seek out some help [[WP:HELPDESK]] as well, with how best to structure and write articles in a neutral voice. Hope this helps! ''Kevin''<sup><small> [[User:Hallward's Ghost|Hallward's Ghost]]</small></sup> <sup><small>([[User talk:Hallward's Ghost|Let's talk]])</small></sup> 01:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1227557527 --> |
|||
::I appreciate your response. I disagree. If you are talking about Shakespeare, you must cite experts on the topic and how they consider him to be the best. It is the same for Guillermo. [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::Please show me a quote and why it not neutral. Thank you. [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::Here is an example of someone, who like Guillermo, stood out in their field. |
|||
::::[[Paco de Lucía]] |
|||
::::The article states sources that explain how he is one of the greatest guitar players ever. [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::One can write from a neutral point of view about Shakespeare. I would really encourage you to read through the links provided by Geoff in his Welcome message. ''Kevin''<sup><small> [[User:Hallward's Ghost|Hallward's Ghost]]</small></sup> <sup><small>([[User talk:Hallward's Ghost|Let's talk]])</small></sup> 01:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::I think I am right. We don't want people to make up fantasies, that is why we have this rule. But Rojas Bazan's article is no fantasy. I do appreciate you taking the time to discuss this. [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Do you still disagree? [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:31, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Show me one quote that you believe lacks neutrality. [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::I can change my mind, but you need to be more specific. Thank you sir. [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*The entire article reads like an advertisement for him. That is, by definition, not a neutral point of view. Multiple editors have pointed this out at the article with the advert tag. Please take the time to read through the links Geoff sent to you in the Welcome message. The article is not ''bad'', it just needs some work to change it's ''tone'' from hagiographical to a neutral, encyclopedic point of view. That's all I have to say on it, but again, I strongly encourage you to take the time to read through those links. They're very helpful. ''Kevin''<sup><small> [[User:Hallward's Ghost|Hallward's Ghost]]</small></sup> <sup><small>([[User talk:Hallward's Ghost|Let's talk]])</small></sup> 01:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*:The issue is that Guillermo is not in a field that the editors are aware of. He is not a basketball player or a golf player. They therefore are making assumptions without investigating. Did you read the sources provided in the citation? Did you verify their credibility? I don't believe the article is hagiographical. There is little known about him other than he is great at what he does. Can we get an expert in the field to make a revision? [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
*::I will work towards improving it. I still don't agree but I appreciate your time and effort teaching me. You have a great day! [[User:Orlando Davis|Orlando Davis]] ([[User talk:Orlando Davis|talk]]) 01:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:26, 8 June 2024
![]() |
User talk:Hallward's Ghost/Archives
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikimedia U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting
![]() |
Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Rescheduled online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West 05/21/2024
The online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West originally scheduled for May 14 has been rescheduled for 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 21, 2024, at meet.google.com/wbg-wgws-sbj. Please see our new meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous