ApatheticName (talk | contribs) →Unfair block of a User Other Than Myself: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic |
Deepfriedokra (talk | contribs) →Unfair block of a User Other Than Myself: Reply You are mistaken. I did not block the user in question. I declined an inadequate unblock request at UTRS. They were blocked as a result of this ANI discussion. Thanks Tag: Reply |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Thank you for reading, [[User:ApatheticName|ApatheticName]] ([[User talk:ApatheticName|talk]]) 10:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you for reading, [[User:ApatheticName|ApatheticName]] ([[User talk:ApatheticName|talk]]) 10:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
:You are mistaken. I did not block the user in question. I declined an inadequate unblock request at UTRS. [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1100#Disruptive_editing_by_User:boundarylayer|They were blocked as a result of this ANI discussion]]. Thanks [[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 11:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:59, 1 May 2023
What is Gog up to...
Howdy, Harrias. Nice to see you again. Gog told me, "...you may wish to check with Harrias what I d[o] for fun. Although what they do is even more gruelling." Any idea on what this vague statement means? I suspect Gog is up to no good again... Unlimitedlead (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Unlimitedlead: I've seen the pictures, it's ghastly! Harrias (he/him) • talk 16:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh dear. Unlimitedlead (talk) 16:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1866 Helston by-election
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1866 Helston by-election you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1866 Helston by-election
The article 1866 Helston by-election you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1866 Helston by-election for comments about the article, and Talk:1866 Helston by-election/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Geoff Bent
The article Geoff Bent you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Geoff Bent for comments about the article, and Talk:Geoff Bent/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ixtal -- Ixtal (talk) 10:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK for 1866 Helston by-election
On 18 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1866 Helston by-election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that both candidates in the 1866 Helston by-election received the same number of votes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1866 Helston by-election. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1866 Helston by-election), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
If you like the tool, I need a small favor
Black Monday 1987 in FAC needs a source review...If you have any time to spare. I don't know how to add a sig onn a cellphone... § Lingzhi (talk) 10:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Harrias. See you're busy now; hope it's "good busy", not "bad busy". You want me to ask for someone else to do a spot check of sources? I don't wanna hang a burden over your life like I did for BF43 (sorry about that one, BTW)... § Lingzhi (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Lingzhi.Renascence: Yeah, not "bad busy", just not getting as much free time to sit in front of a computer as I'd like! It should just be until the weekend, but I'm not going to be offended if you seek out someone else. Harrias (he/him) • talk 06:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Somerset County Cricket Club in 1883
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Somerset County Cricket Club in 1883 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 10:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unfair block of a User Other Than Myself
Hello,
Several months ago the User BoundaryLayer was blocked indefinitely, for what looks to me like saying that Chinese slave labour is used to build renewable power. This a fact which has been reported on in what has been deemed a reliable source.
This user had a great track record before he was blocked, having reviewed an award for getting the Nuclear Power article up to good status.
It looks to me like he blocked, by Cullen328 and Deep fried okra, for criticising renewable power when compared to nuclear power, which is a very real and unsettled political debate. If this is the case their unblock needs to be looked at as Wikipedia prides itself on having neutral point of view. What is your opinion, and can you give me advice on what to do?
Thank you for reading, ApatheticName (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- You are mistaken. I did not block the user in question. I declined an inadequate unblock request at UTRS. They were blocked as a result of this ANI discussion. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)