Ian Pitchford (talk | contribs) Hebron |
CAD6DEE2E8DAD95A (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Humus, I hope you don't mind but I have moved this back from "1929 Hebron massacre" as the 1929 disturbances included much more than the events in Hebron. The massacre itself should have its own article in my view. Perhaps you'd be interested in starting the article? --[[User:Ian Pitchford|Ian Pitchford]] 21:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC) |
Humus, I hope you don't mind but I have moved this back from "1929 Hebron massacre" as the 1929 disturbances included much more than the events in Hebron. The massacre itself should have its own article in my view. Perhaps you'd be interested in starting the article? --[[User:Ian Pitchford|Ian Pitchford]] 21:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
:There were a couple of dozen incidents during the 1929 disturbances, including the murder of Jewish children and elderly at Safed. Describing the events as the "Hebron massacre" implies that none of the other incidents were important. This is wrong, as the Shaw Commission report explains. --[[User:Ian Pitchford|Ian Pitchford]] 07:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
:There were a couple of dozen incidents during the 1929 disturbances, including the murder of Jewish children and elderly at Safed. Describing the events as the "Hebron massacre" implies that none of the other incidents were important. This is wrong, as the Shaw Commission report explains. --[[User:Ian Pitchford|Ian Pitchford]] 07:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
== [[Jew Watch]] == |
|||
[[Hey Jude]]. |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jew_Watch&diff=68806089&oldid=68731504 My edit] |
|||
*"notoriety" is an inherently negative word. In this case, it is from the editor; not attributed. I first changed it to slightly positive "fame", then to "attracted attention". You rejected both...? |
|||
*"Although claiming neutrality", insinuates that the names of the headings are not neutral. Listing them says enough. |
|||
*Elders of Zion: I have a ton of excuses for that, but only concerning the content. But, if the protocol was cited as if it was authentic...''' I digress'''. |
|||
*"[[Neo-Nazism]]" encompasses fascism, racism, anti-Semitism etc. Not just anti-Semitism, although you may see it that way. I really don’t think they qualify. They don't call themselves Nazis either. |
|||
* "unintentional (or intentional)": empty statement, X or not X... nothing left. |
|||
And, you really should only mark vandalism as minor edits when reverting. |
|||
Lastly, it was not my intention to hide my revert by editing twice (just read about rollback). |
|||
--[[User:CAD6DEE2E8DAD95A|CAD6DEE2E8DAD95A]] <font size=1>[[User_talk:CAD6DEE2E8DAD95A|(hello!)]]</font> 23:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:10, 10 August 2006
Home | Talk | List | Tools | Policy | Cmmn | Puzzle | Ubx | Nav |
Archives |
---|
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, |
6, 7, 8, 9, 10, |
11, 12, ... |
... |
... |
Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or .
? |
|
Resolution 242
The edit you have just omitted was not irrelevant at all. From a legal perspective, the ICJ ruling of July 2004 asserts that: 1. The whole of Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem are occupied territories. 2. Under the principle of the inadmissibility of acquiring territory by war, Israel has no right to change the reality on the ground in these territories. That includes building settlemens and the partition wall, all of which are illegal. 3. Israel should withdraw from all of these territories or else those agreed upon with the Palestinians.
Thus, the ruling makes it very clear that legally speaking, the interpretation of 242 which calls for a full withdrawal is the correct one. However, the debate over the interpretation remains of value from a political perspective, not a legal one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rearticulator (talk • contribs)
Image copyright problem with Image:Peelmap-a.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Peelmap-a.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
1929 Palestine riots
Humus, I hope you don't mind but I have moved this back from "1929 Hebron massacre" as the 1929 disturbances included much more than the events in Hebron. The massacre itself should have its own article in my view. Perhaps you'd be interested in starting the article? --Ian Pitchford 21:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- There were a couple of dozen incidents during the 1929 disturbances, including the murder of Jewish children and elderly at Safed. Describing the events as the "Hebron massacre" implies that none of the other incidents were important. This is wrong, as the Shaw Commission report explains. --Ian Pitchford 07:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- "notoriety" is an inherently negative word. In this case, it is from the editor; not attributed. I first changed it to slightly positive "fame", then to "attracted attention". You rejected both...?
- "Although claiming neutrality", insinuates that the names of the headings are not neutral. Listing them says enough.
- Elders of Zion: I have a ton of excuses for that, but only concerning the content. But, if the protocol was cited as if it was authentic... I digress.
- "Neo-Nazism" encompasses fascism, racism, anti-Semitism etc. Not just anti-Semitism, although you may see it that way. I really don’t think they qualify. They don't call themselves Nazis either.
- "unintentional (or intentional)": empty statement, X or not X... nothing left.
And, you really should only mark vandalism as minor edits when reverting. Lastly, it was not my intention to hide my revert by editing twice (just read about rollback).